Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Acute Toxicity: other routes

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: other routes
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
1942
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Although the study report in a peer-reviewed journal fulfilled scientific principles, some deviations (as expected) from OECD guideline developed 40 years later are apparent, mainly consisting of lack of experimental details.
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Studies on the Physiological Effects of Sulfamic Acid and Ammonium Sulfamate
Author:
A.M. Ambrose
Year:
1943
Bibliographic source:
The Journal of industrial hygiene and toxicology 25:26-28
Report date:
1942

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
4 doses (0.1, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.8 g/kg bw sulfamic acid) were tested for acute oral toxicity by intraperitonal injection. Representative numbers of animals were used per dose group. Sulfamic acid was applied as 4% aqueous solution having a pH of 0.82, measured electrometrically.
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
pre-dates GLP requirements
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Sulphamidic acid
EC Number:
226-218-8
EC Name:
Sulphamidic acid
Cas Number:
5329-14-6
Molecular formula:
H3NO3S
IUPAC Name:
sulfamic acid
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Details on test material:
sulphamidic acid

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
other: reported as white rat, no strain details provided
Sex:
male

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
intraperitoneal
Vehicle:
water
Remarks:
4% aqueous solution, pH 0.82
Details on exposure:
Male white rats weighing 80 - 100 grams were used
Doses:
0.1, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.8 g sulfamic acid/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5 animals per dose group
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
All doses were administered in terms of sulfamic acid per kilogram of body weight
Statistics:
no statistics applied

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Sex:
male
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
< 100 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
Mortality was observed in all dose groups applied being greater 50%.
100 mg/kg bw: 4/5 dead
200 mg/kg bw: 5/5 dead
400 mg/kg bw: 3/5 dead
800 mg/kg bw: 5/5 dead
Clinical signs:
The author states "Sulfamic acid after intraperitoneal injection produced no toxic symptoms, although death occured on all dose levels 4 to 72 hours after adminstration."
Body weight:
80 - 100 gram per rat, no effects on body weight development were reported
Gross pathology:
not performed in the acute study but in a chronic study, also reported in the article, histopathological examination failed to reveal and changes that could be ascribed to sulfamic acid exposure.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Sulfamic acid showed high systemic toxicity when applied intraperitoneal. When comparing to the effects seen in the oral study, described in the publication, the mortality seen in the i.p. study may be attributable to the very low pH (0.82) of the 4% aqueous solution injected.
Executive summary:

In this published study acute intraperitoneal toxicity to rats was investigated up to a maximum dose of 800 mg/kg bw. Mortality > 50% occured at all doses (100, 200, 400 and 800 mg/kg bw). The animals produced no toxic symptoms, although death occured at all dose groups after 4 - 72 hours of exposure (i.p.). Therefore, no LD50 was reported. When comparing to the effects seen in the oral study, described in the same publication, the mortality seen in the i.p. study may be attributable to the very low pH (0.82) of the 4% aqueous solution injected. This is also supported by findings when ammonium sulfamate was applied (reported in the same study) which in 4% aqueous solution has a pH of 4.82 and only caused mortality at 800 mg/kg bw (6 out of 10 animals) when applied by intraperitoneal injection (no mortality at 100, 200 and 400 mg/kg bw).