Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Basic toxicokinetics

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
basic toxicokinetics in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
other information
Reliability:
3 (not reliable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Documentation insufficient for assessment

Data source

Reference
Title:
No information
Author:
Ariyoshi T. et al. (1975). Relationship beween chemical structure and activity. II. Influence of isomers in dichlorobenzene, trichlorobenzene and tetrachlorobenzene on the activities of drug-metabolizing enzymes. Chem. Pharm. Bull.23, 824-830

Materials and methods

Objective of study:
toxicokinetics
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Method: other: see freetext
GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1,2,3-trichlorobenzene
EC Number:
201-757-1
EC Name:
1,2,3-trichlorobenzene
Cas Number:
87-61-6
Molecular formula:
C6H3Cl3
IUPAC Name:
1,2,3-trichlorobenzene
Details on test material:
IUCLID4 Test substance: other TS: 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene, no data on purity

Test animals

Species:
rat

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
other: traganth gum solution
Duration and frequency of treatment / exposure:
3 day(s)
Doses / concentrations
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
Females: 0 or 250 mg/kg bw in 2% traganth gum solution
No. of animals per sex per dose / concentration:
Females: 6

Results and discussion

Any other information on results incl. tables

RS-Freetext:
body weight development and liver weights were affected by treatment.
The only parameters which were significant different from controls were  (mean values of 6 rats):
Microsomal protein content: 
18.3 mg/g liver versus 16.9 mg/g liver in control rats
Microsomal phosphorus content:
299 µg/g liver versus 238 µg/g liver in control rats
Cytochromes P-450:
0.84 nmoles/mg protein versus 0.70 nmoles/mg protein in control rats

Applicant's summary and conclusion