Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2021-09-23 - 2021-10-29
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2022
Report date:
2022

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.46 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model Test)
Version / remarks:
No. 640/2012
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: UN GHS (2003, last rev. 2015)
Deviations:
no
Principles of method if other than guideline:
MatTek Corporation Protocol: In vitro EpiDermTM Skin Irritation Test (EPI-200-SIT) For use with MatTek Corporation’s Reconstructed Human Epidermal Model EpiDerm (EPI-200-SIT); Version 12/04/2020.
MatTek Corporation Protocol: EpiOcularTM Eye Irritation Test (OCL-200-EIT)
For the prediction of acute ocular irritation of chemicals: Identification of chemicals not requiring classification and labeling for eye irritation or serious eye damage; Version 02/02/2021
Note:
The Pre-Test (Assessment of Colored or Staining Materials and Assessment of Direct Test Article Reduction by MTT) was performed according to the MatTek Protocol “EpiOcularTM Eye Irritation Test.
Reason:
The OECD TG 439 requires the evaluation of colored or staining materials spectrophotometrically but does not state the evaluation criteria. These criteria are missing in the MatTek protocol “In vitro EpiDermTM Skin Irritation Test”, too. But the identical scientific hypothesis is to clarify in the Eye Irritation Test and there the requirements are described.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Date of inspection: 23 November 2018; 21 February 2019; 12-14 March 2019

Test material

1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Reaction mass of 3-({4-[2-(5,6-dichloro-1,3-benzothiazol-2-yl)diazen-1-yl]phenyl}(ethyl)amino)propanenitrile and 3-({4-[2-(6,7-dichloro-1,3-benzothiazol-2-yl)diazen-1-yl]phenyl}(ethyl)amino)propanenitrile
EC Number:
616-632-0
Cas Number:
78564-87-1
Molecular formula:
C18H15Cl2N5S
IUPAC Name:
Reaction mass of 3-({4-[2-(5,6-dichloro-1,3-benzothiazol-2-yl)diazen-1-yl]phenyl}(ethyl)amino)propanenitrile and 3-({4-[2-(6,7-dichloro-1,3-benzothiazol-2-yl)diazen-1-yl]phenyl}(ethyl)amino)propanenitrile
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Details on test material:
Identification: Disperse Red 153

In vitro test system

Test system:
human skin model
Source species:
human
Cell source:
other: Standard Assay Kit and MTT-100 kit were purchased from MatTek Corporation (82105 Bratislava, Slovakia, Lot No.: 36101).
Control samples:
yes, concurrent negative control
yes, concurrent positive control
Amount/concentration applied:
25 ± 2 mg (39.7 mg/cm2 according to guideline) of the test item was applied onto the surface of the tissue. The tissues were wetted with 25 µL DPBS prior to application.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
60 minutes.
Number of replicates:
Triplicate

Test system

Type of coverage:
other: Topical
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent positive control
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
25 ± 2 mg (39.7 mg/cm2 according to guideline)


NEGATIVE CONTROL
25 ± 2 mg (39.7 mg/cm2)


POSITIVE CONTROL
25 ± 2 mg (39.7 mg/cm2)
Duration of treatment / exposure:
60 minutes

Results and discussion

In vitro

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
freeze killed tissues
Value:
5.59
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
not applicable
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Remarks:
Non specific killed control tissues: mean rel. viability 2.19%
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
viable tissues
Value:
7.41
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
not applicable
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
Tissues
Value:
108.12
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation

Any other information on results incl. tables

Pre-Experiment


Assessment of Colour Interference














































Treatment Group


OD 570 nm 
Well 1


OD 570 nm 
Well 2


Mean OD of 
2 Wells


Mean OD

of 2 Wells blank

corrected


Evaluation Mean OD570 
(blank corrected)
> 0.08


Blank 
Aqua Deion.


0.037


0.036


0.037


--


--


Test Item + Aqua Deion.


0.075


0.081


0.078


0.041


no


Blank Isopropanol


0.039


0.038


0.038


--


--


Test Item+

Isopropanol


2.611


2.778


2.694


2.656


yes


The mean OD of the test item in isopropanol was > 0.08 and therefore, an additional test with viable tissues without MTT addition was necessary in the main experiment.


 


Main experiment


Results after treatment with Disperse Red 153 and the controls


 



















































































Dose



Mean OD 



Relative



Standard



Mean



Group



of



Viability [%]



Deviation



Relative Viability



 


3 Tissues

Tissue 1, 2, 3 ***



[%]



[%]



Negative Control



1.725



1.757



3.9



100.0



Positive Control



0.084



1.733



1.2



4.88



Test Item



1.995



1.700



0.1



108.12



Negative Control Viable Tissues



0.007



0.116



0.3



0.43



Test Item Viable Tissues



0.128



0.111



0.2



7.41



Negative Control Freeze killed Tissues



0.056



0.104



0.0



3.23



Test Item Freeze killed Tissues



0.096



0.225



0.0



5.59



Non Specific Killed Control Tissues



0.038



0.290



0.1



2.19



 


 


 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
In conclusion, it can be stated that in this study and under the experimental conditions reported, Disperse Red 153 is non-irritant to skin according to UN GHS and EU CLP regulation.
Executive summary:

This in vitro study was performed to assess the skin irritation potential of Disperse Red 153 by means of the Human Skin Model Test.


The test item proved to be a MTT reducer in the MTT interference pre-experiment. Also, it proved to dye isopropanol in the color interference pre-experiment since the OD of the test item in isopropanol at 570 nm after blank correction was > 0.08. Therefore, additional tests with freeze-killed tissues, viable tissues and NSKC had to be performed. The viability values resulted in these additional tests were used to correct the values gained in the main experiment.


Each three tissues of the human skin model EpiDerm were treated with the test item, the negative control (DPBS) or the positive control (5% SDS) for 60 minutes.


After treatment with the negative control the absorbance values were well within the required range of the acceptability criterion of mean OD ³ 0.8 and ≤ 2.8 for the 60 minutes treatment interval, thus assuring the quality of the tissues.


Treatment with the positive control induced a decrease in the viability compared with the negative control to 4.88%, thus ensuring the validity of the test system.


The standard deviations between the three tissue percentage viability values of each group (test item, positive and negative controls) in the main test were below 18 (threshold according OECD 439: ≤ 18), thus ensuring the validity of the study.


After treatment with the test item Disperse Red 153 the mean viability value was 108.12% compared to the relative absorbance value of the negative control. This value is above the threshold for irritancy of ≤ 50%. Therefore, the test item is not considered to possess an irritant potential.