Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Partition coefficient

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
September 13, 2021 - September 16, 2021
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.8 (Partition Coefficient - HPLC Method)
Version / remarks:
EC No. 2016/266
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 117 (Partition Coefficient (n-octanol / water), HPLC Method)
Version / remarks:
2004
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of method:
HPLC method
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water
Analytical method:
high-performance liquid chromatography
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
5.8
Temp.:
20 °C
pH:
6

Individual results:


Calculation of the partition coefficient log POW:


The program KOWWIN (part of EPI Suite) was used for calculating the log POW of the test item. The calculated value was 5.8.


Therefore, according to the guidelines, the partition coefficient n-octanol/water of the test item at room temperature was determined by the HPLC method.


HPLC method:


According to the certificate of analysis the test item contained two main constituents. Therefore, the evaluation was performed for both constituents and a weighted average log Pow was calculated. The results from the HPLC method are summarized in Table 2 to Table 7.


Table 2: Determination of the dead time t0


















Dead time marker



tR / min


1st injection



t/ min


2nd injection



tR / min
mean



Thiourea



1.041



1.043



1.042



Table 3: Calibration data 1st injection



















































































Calibration substance



tR / min



k



log k



log POW 1)



2-Butanone



1.247



0.20



-0.71



0.3



Acetanilide



1.323



0.27



-0.57



1.0



Cinnamyl alcohol



1.594



0.53



-0.28



1.9



2,6-Dichlorobenzonitrile



2.067



0.98



-0.01



2.6



Allyl phenyl ether



3.066



1.94



0.29



2.9



Benzophenone



2.739



1.63



0.21



3.2



Cumene



5.792



4.56



0.66



3.7



Diphenyl ether



5.247



4.04



0.61



4.2



Fluoranthene



10.794



9.36



0.97



5.1



4,4’-DDT



28.095



25.96



1.41



6.5



1) OECD guideline 117, adopted 2004


Regression:


logPOW = a + b logk


Parameters:


a = 2.4331


b = 2.727


r2 = 0.9802


Table 4: log POW of the test item – 1st injection



























 



tR / min



k



log k



log POW



Test item peak 1



17.248



15.55



1.19



5.68



Test item peak 2



21.679



19.81



1.30



5.97



Table 5: Calibration data 2nd injection



















































































Calibration substance



tR / min



k



log k



log POW 2)



2-Butanone



1.254



0.20



-0.69



0.3



Acetanilide



1.335



0.28



-0.55



1.0



Cinnamyl alcohol



1.623



0.56



-0.25



1.9



2,6-Dichlorobenzonitrile



2.094



1.01



0.00



2.6



Allyl phenyl ether



3.061



1.94



0.29



2.9



Benzophenone



2.719



1.61



0.21



3.2



Cumene



5.786



4.55



0.66



3.7



Diphenyl ether



5.279



4.07



0.61



4.2



Fluoranthene



10.844



9.41



0.97



5.1



4,4’-DDT



28.308



26.17



1.42



6.5



2) OECD guideline 117, adopted 2004


Regression:


logPOW = a + b logk       


Parameters:


a = 2.4074


b = 2.754


r2 = 0.9813


Table 6: log POW of the test item – 2nd injection



























 



tR / min



k



log k



log POW



Test item peak 1



17.371



15.67



1.20



5.70



Test item peak 2



21.841



19.96



1.30



5.99



The results of the 1st and 2nd determination are summarized in Table 7.


Table 7: log POW of the test item – summary
































Test item



 



log POW



 



Peak area / %



1st injection



2nd injection



Mean value



Peak 1



5.68



5.70



5.69



55.0



Peak 2



5.97



5.99



5.98



44.8



The weighted average log Pow was calculated according to the equationgiven in OECD 117 and was determined to be:


log POW = 5.8

Conclusions:
The partition coefficient n-octanol/water of the test item was determined to be: log Pow = 5.8
Executive summary:

The partition coefficient n-octanol/water of the test item was determined according to the HPLC method (European Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008 and No. 2016/266, method A.24. and OECD 117 (2004)).


It was found to be: log POW = 5.8

Description of key information

The partition coefficient n-octanol/water of the test item was determined to be: log POW = 5.8

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Log Kow (Log Pow):
5.8
at the temperature of:
20 °C

Additional information

The partition coefficient n-octanol/water of the test item was determined according to the HPLC method (European Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008 and No. 2016/266, method A.24. and OECD 117 (2004)).


It was found to be: log POW = 5.8