Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / bone marrow chromosome aberration
Type of information:
other: Bibliographic source
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Remarks:
in accordance with the recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee of Mutagenicity Testing [Nichols et al, 19721

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1982

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
other: The experimental procedure was conducted in accordance with the recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee of Mutagenicity Testing
Principles of method if other than guideline:
In order to study the chromosomal aberrations induced by tartar emetic , male rats (Rattus norvegicus) 8-15 weeks old were used. The experimental procedure was conducted in accordance with the recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee of Mutagenicity Testing [Nichols et al, 19721]. Both drugs were administered intraperitoneally at three different doses: the clinical (usage) dose, an intermediate dose, and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), which is considered to be equal to the LDs that was determined experimentally [El Nahas, 19791. These doses are 2, 8.4, 14.8 mg/kg for tartar emetic.
Each dose was studied both acutely (6,24, and 48 hours after a single injection) and subacutely where the drug was given for 5 consecutive days and the rats were killed 6 hours later. Five rats were sacrificed in each treatment group, and four untreated rats served as control for each dose.
GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Reference substance 001
Cas Number:
28300-74-5
Molecular formula:
C8H4K2O12Sb2 ∙ 3H2O
Details on test material:
Trihydrate salt.
Specific details on test material used for the study:
form of the substance (anhydrous or trihydrated) not specified.

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
other: Rattus norvegicus
Sex:
male

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
intraperitoneal
Details on exposure:
the substance was administered intraperitoneally at three different doses: the clinical (usage) dose, an intermediate dose, and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), which is considered to be equal to the LD5. These doses are 2, 8.4, 14.8 mg/kg
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Each dose was studied both acutely (6,24, and 48 hours after a single injection) and subacutely
Frequency of treatment:
the drug was given for 5 consecutive days and the rats were killed 6 hours later.
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Dose / conc.:
2 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Dose / conc.:
8.4 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Dose / conc.:
14.8 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
No. of animals per sex per dose:
Five rats were sacrificed in each treatment group, and four untreated rats served as control for each dose.
Control animals:
yes

Results and discussion

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Tartar emetic induced chromosomal aberrations,namely chromatid gaps, chromatid breaks, and centric fusion.
Tartar Emetic significantly increased (relative to control) the number of metaphases with chromosomal aberrations after 6,24, and 48 hours of both acute
and subacute treatments at three different doses. There were no significant differences in chromosomal aberrations after 6, 24,and 48 hours of the acute treatment at all doses tested. An exceptional case was recorded 6 hours after the MTD (14.8 mg/kg); here the number of cells with aberrations was significantly higher than its 24-hour and 48-hour counterparts.