Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2014
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2014
Report date:
2014

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
N,N'-dibutyl-N,N'-bis(1,2,2,6,6-pentamethylpiperidin-4-yl)-6-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine
EC Number:
940-393-4
Cas Number:
1702355-94-9
Molecular formula:
C35 H66 N8
IUPAC Name:
N,N'-dibutyl-N,N'-bis(1,2,2,6,6-pentamethylpiperidin-4-yl)-6-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine
Test material form:
solid: bulk
Details on test material:
- State of aggregation: solid

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Wiga GmbH, Sandhofer Weg 7, 97633 Sulzfeld, Germany
- Age at study initiation: 6 - 8 months
- Weight at study initiation: 3.95 kg – 4.85 kg
- Housing: single
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 +/- 3
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Test system

Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
clipped
Vehicle:
water
Remarks:
Minimally moistened with highly deionized water
Controls:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 g
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4h
Observation period:
72h
Number of animals:
3
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: flanks
- Type of wrap if used: test patch, semiocclusive dressing

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): The test item was removed at the end of the exposure period with Lutrol®** and Lutrol® / water (1 : 1).

SCORING SYSTEM:

Erythema and eschar formation

0 No erythema
1 Very slight erythema (barely perceptible)
2 Well- defined erythema
3 Moderate to severe erythema
4 Severe erythema (beet redness) to eschar formation preventing grading of erythema

Edema formation

0 No edema
1 Very slight edema (barely perceptible)
2 Slight edema (edges of area well- defined by definite raising)
3 Moderate edema (raised approx. 1 mm)
4 Severe edema (raised more than 1 mm and extending beyond area of exposure)

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
other: 0h
Score:
1
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 0h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 1h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 1h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Very slight erythema (grade 1) was observed immediately after removal of the patch in one animal only.
The cutaneous reaction was reversible in this animal within 1 hour after removal of the patch.
Mean scores over 24, 48 and 72 hours for each animal were 0.0, 0.0 and 0.0 for erythema and 0.0, 0.0 and 0.0 for edema.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met