Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 605-708-9 | CAS number: 174125-93-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1996-03-26 - 1996-04-09 (experimental phase)
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- Well-documented study according to OECD 471 with minor deviations: only four strains of S. typhimurium (TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100) were used, data on E.coli WP2 strains or S. typhimurium TA102 are lacking. However, since these strains were mainly included in the recent version of OECD 471 because the four formerly only recommended (OECD 471 version of May 1983) S. typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100 may not detect certain oxidising mutagens, cross-linking agents and hydrazines, and this mode of action is not likely to occur based on the chemical structure of the test item, this restriction is considered to be negligible.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 996
- Report date:
- 1996
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals No. 471: Genetic Toxicology: Salmonella typhimurium, Reverse Mutation Assay, 26 May 1983
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- EEC Methods for Determination of Toxicity, Annex to Directive 92/69/EEC, (OJ No. L383A, 29.12.92), Part B, Method B.14. Other effects - Mutagenicity: Salmonella typhimurium - Reverse Mutation Assay
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: US Environmental Protection Agency, Method: HG-Gene Muta ― S. typhimurium: The Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay, 1984
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- bis(O,O-2-ethylhexyl-thiophosphoryl)polysulfide
- EC Number:
- 605-708-9
- Cas Number:
- 174125-93-0
- Molecular formula:
- n.a.
- IUPAC Name:
- bis(O,O-2-ethylhexyl-thiophosphoryl)polysulfide
- Test material form:
- liquid
- Remarks:
- Orange/brown
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: sponsor
Method
- Target gene:
- his-
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CELLS USED
- Source of cells: The strains were obtained from Professor B.N. Ames, University of California, California, USA.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254 induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Top Dose: 5000 µg/plate, as demanded by the guideline, no toxic effects in the pre-test noted. Ideally the concentrations chosen for the mutation tests should include a minimum of three non-toxic concentrations.
Doses: 0, 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: ethanol
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: At 50 mg/ml the test item was immiscible with water and dimethyl sulphoxide, and miscible with ethanol.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- solvent controls
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- ethanol
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- Solvent control for positive controls: DMSO
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
- Cell density at seeding (if applicable):
DURATION
- Preincubation period: none
- Exposure duration: 3 days
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): = exposure duration
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): histidine-minimal agar
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Three petri dishes were used for each dose level.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
Any toxic effects of the test substance can be detected by a substantial reduction in revertant colony counts or by the absence of a complete background bacterial lawn. In the absence of any toxic effects the top concentration used in the main tests is the same as that used in the preliminary toxicity test. - Rationale for test conditions:
- As stipulated by the guideline
- Evaluation criteria:
- ASSESSMENT OF RESULTS
The mean number of revertant colonies for all treatment groups is compared with the solvent control groups. The mutagenic activity is assessed by applying the following criteria:
(a) If treatment with a test substance produces an increase in revertant colony numbers of at least twice the concurrent solvent controls, with some evidence of a positive dose-relationship, in two separate experiments, with any bacterial strain either in the presence or absence of S-9 mix, it is considered to show evidence of mutagenic activity in this test system. No statistical analysis is performed.
(b) If treatment with a test substance does not produce reproducible increases of at least 1.5 times the concurrent solvent controls, at any dose level with any bacterial strain, it is considered to show no evidence of mutagenic activity in this test system. No statistical analysis is performed.
(c) If the results obtained fail to satisfy the criteria for a clear "positive" or "negative" response given in paragraphs (a) and (b), the following approach is taken in order to resolve the issue of the substance's mutagenic activity in this test system.
(i) Repeat tests may be performed using modifications of the experimental method. These modifications include (but are not restricted to), the use of a narrower dose range than that already tested; the use of different levels of liver homogenate S-9 fraction in the S-9 mix. Should an increase in revertant colony numbers be observed which satisfies paragraph (a) the substance is considered to show evidence of mutagenic activity in this test system. No statistical analysis is performed.
(ii) If no clear "positive" response can be obtained the test data may be subjected to analysis to determine the statistical significance of any observed increases in revertant colony numbers. The statistical procedures used will be those described by Mahon et al. (1989) and will usually be analysis of variance followed by Dunnett's test. - Statistics:
- see above
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 5000 µg/plate (1st experiment), at 1500 & 5000 µg/plate (2nd experiment)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 5000 µg/plate and at 1500 µg/plate -S9 only (1st experiment), at 1500 & 5000 µg/plate (2nd experiment)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Testing for mutagenicity in bacteria was performed according to OECD TG 471 of 1983. Here, only four strains of S. typhimurium (TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100) were used, data on E.coli WP2 strains or S. typhimurium TA102 are lacking. However, since these strains were mainly included in the recent version of OECD 471 because the four formerly only recommended (OECD 471 version of May 1983) S. typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100 may not detect certain oxidising mutagens, cross-linking agents and hydrazines, and this mode of action is not likely to occur based on the chemical structure of the test item, this restriction is considered to be negligible. Also, the testing was sufficiently documented, positive and negative controls gave the appropriate response. Hence, the results can be considered as sufficiently reliable to assess the mutagenic potential of the test item. In both presence and absence of metabolic activation, the test item did not induce a significant increase in the number of revertant colonies per plate over those of the negative control plates. In consequence, the test item is considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test.
- Executive summary:
In this in vitro assessment of the mutagenic potential of the test item according to OECD TG 471 (1983) under GLP, histidine dependent auxotrophic mutants of Salmonella typhimurium (strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100) were exposed to the test substance, diluted in ethanol which was also used as a negative control.
Two independent mutation tests were performed, in the presence and absence of liver preparations from Aroclor 1254-induced rats.
In the preliminary toxicity test with dose levels of up to 5000 µg/plate no toxicity was observed. A top dose level of 5000 µg/plate was chosen for the subsequent mutation study. Other dose levels used in the mutation assays were: 1500, 500, 150 and 50 µg/plate.
No evidence of mutagenic activity was seen at any dose level of the test item in either mutation test.
The concurrent positive control compounds demonstrated the sensitivity of the assay and the metabolising activity of the liver preparations.
It is concluded that, when tested in ethanol, the test item shows no evidence of mutagenic activity in this bacterial system.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.