Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
April 24 2002 - April 27 2002.
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2002
Report date:
2002

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.2400 (Acute Eye Irritation)
Version / remarks:
August 1998
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-chloro-N-[[[4-(trifluoromethoxy)phenyl]amino]carbonyl]benzamide
EC Number:
264-980-3
EC Name:
2-chloro-N-[[[4-(trifluoromethoxy)phenyl]amino]carbonyl]benzamide
Cas Number:
64628-44-0
Molecular formula:
C15H10ClF3N2O3
IUPAC Name:
3-(2-chlorobenzoyl)-1-[4-(trifluoromethoxy)phenyl]urea
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Remarks:
White powder

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
Age: Young adult

Source: Received from Davidson’s Mill Farm, South Brunswick, NJ on April 19, 2002.

Housing: The animals were singly housed in suspended stainless steel caging with mesh floors. Litter paper was placed beneath the cage and was changed at least three times per week.

Photoperiod: 12 hour light/dark cycle.

Acclimation Period: 5 days.

Food: Pelleted Purina Rabbit Chow #5326

Water: Filtered tap water was supplied ad libitum by automatic water dispensing system.

Contaminants: There were no known contaminants reasonably expected to be found in the food or water at levels which would have interfered with the results of this study.

Test system

Vehicle:
physiological saline
Controls:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Amount / concentration applied:
A volume of one-tenth of a milliliter (0.08-0.10 g) of the test substance, as received, was instilled into the conjunctival sac of the right eye of each rabbit by pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Not applicable: treated eyes were not rinsed after exposure
Observation period (in vivo):
1, 24, 48 and 72 hours post-instillation
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3 (2 males and 1 female)
Details on study design:
Preparation and selection of animals: Prior to instillation, both eyes of a number of animals were examined using a fluorescein dye procedure. One drop of 2% ophthalmic fluorescein sodium was instilled into both eyes of each rabbit. The eyes were rinsed with physiological saline (0.9% NaCl) approximately 30 seconds after instillation of the fluorescein. Using a Spectroline® Lamp (compact 4-watt UV Lamp), the eyes were checked for gross abnormalities according to the "Scale for Scoring Ocular Lesions". Only healthy animals without preexisting ocular irritation were selected for test.


Ocular scoring: Ocular irritation was evaluated using a high-intensity white light (Mag Lite) in accordance with the Draize method. The fluorescein dye evaluation procedure was used at 24 hours to verify the absence of corneal damage. In addition to observations of the cornea, iris and conjunctivae, any other observed lesions were noted.

Cage-Side Observations: The animals were observed for signs of gross toxicity and behavioral changes at least once daily during the test period. Observations included gross evaluation of skin and fur, eyes and mucous membranes, respiratory, circulatory, autonomic and central nervous systems, somatomotor activity and behavior pattern. Particular attention was directed to observation of tremors, convulsions, salivation, diarrhea and coma.

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.1
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 h
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritant / corrosive response data:
The incidence, severity and reversibility of irritation are detailed below (Table 1 and 2).
Other effects:
All animals appeared active and healthy. Apart from the eye irritation noted below, there were no other signs of gross toxicity.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Time post instillation and incidence of irritation (corneal opacity, iritis, conjunctivitis).




































Time Post Instillation



Corneal Opacity



Iritis



Conjunctivitis



1 hour



0/3



0/3



3/3 (score 1 each)



24 hours



0/3



0/3



1/3 (score 1)



48 hours



0/3



0/3



0/3



72 hours



0/3



0/3



0/3



 


Table 2: Time post instillation and severity of irritation- mean score. 


























Time Post Instillation



Severity of Irritation – Mean Score



1 hour



4



24 hours



0.7



48 hours



0



72 hours



0


Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Triflumuron was found to be a minimal and reversible eye irritant under the conditions of this study and does not require classification for eye irritation according to the CLP criteria.
Executive summary:

A primary eye irritation test was conducted with New Zealand albino rabbits to determine the potential for triflumuron to produce irritation from a single instillation via the ocular route. Under the conditions of this study, the test substance is classified as minimally irritating to the eye. A volume of one-tenth of a milliliter (0.08-0.10 g) of the test substance, as received, was instilled into the right eye of three healthy rabbits. The left eye remained untreated and served as a control. Ocular irritation was evaluated by the method of Draize.  No corneal opacity or iritis was observed during the study. One hour following instillation, all three treated eyes exhibited conjunctivitis. The overall incidence and severity of irritation decreased with time. All animals were free of ocular irritation within 48 hours.  Triflumuron was found to be a minimal and reversible eye irritant under the conditions of this study and does not require classification for eye irritation according to the CLP criteria.