Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: inhalation
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
the study does not need to be conducted because exposure of humans via inhalation is not likely taking into account the vapour pressure of the substance and/or the possibility of exposure to aerosols, particles or droplets of an inhalable size
Justification for type of information:
The substance has a low dust content and very low vapour pressure
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
data waiving: supporting information
Reference
Endpoint:
particle size distribution (granulometry)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study
Justification for type of information:
Performed using claibrated specialist equipment
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 110 (Particle Size Distribution / Fibre Length and Diameter Distributions - Method A: Particle Size Distribution (effective hydrodynamic radius)
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Using Bettersize instruments, optical analysis.
Dispersed in sunflower oil
GLP compliance:
no
Type of method:
Laser scattering/diffraction
Type of particle tested:
primary particle
Type of distribution:
mass based distribution
Mass median aerodynamic diameter:
ca. 15.8 µm
Key result
Percentile:
D50
Mean:
ca. 15.8 µm
Percentile:
D10
Mean:
ca. 4.45 µm

Approximately 30% < 10 µm

Conclusions:
This sample of fine particles has approximately 30% < 10 µm, but the D10 was 4. 45, suggesting a relatively low dust content.
Different batches and different sources will have different particle size distributions.

Data source

Materials and methods

Results and discussion

Applicant's summary and conclusion