Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-765-0 | CAS number: 110-41-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2000-11-08 to 2000-11-14
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Referenceopen allclose all
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 000
- Report date:
- 2000
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- QSARS for skin sensitization potential of aldehydes and related compounds
- Author:
- Patlewicz G, Roberts DW, Walker JD
- Year:
- 2 003
- Bibliographic source:
- QSAR & Combinatorial Science 22 (2):196-203
- Report date:
- 2003
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- (based on draft test guideline)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-methylundecanal
- EC Number:
- 203-765-0
- EC Name:
- 2-methylundecanal
- Cas Number:
- 110-41-8
- Molecular formula:
- C12H24O
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-methylundecanal
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): 2-methylundecenal
- Substance type: Slightly viscous clear colourless liquid
- Physical state: Liquid
- Analytical purity: 95% (v/v)
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): No data
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: No data
- Isomers composition: No data
- Purity test date: No data
- Lot/batch No.: No data
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: No date but comment that "Stability was assured by reference to the expiry dates provided by the supplier"
- Stability under test conditions: No data
- Storage condition of test material: Ambient conditions under nitrogen
- Compound Control Sample No: S2352501
- Manufacturer: Sigma
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CBA
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan UK Ltd
- Age at study initiation: 7-12 wks old
- Weight at study initiation: No data
- Housing: 4 per cage
- Diet: SDS RM1 (E) SQC pelleted diet ad libitum.
- Water: Tap water ad libitum.
- Acclimation period: No data
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 21 ± 3 °C
- Humidity: 50 % ± 20 %
- Air changes (per hr): No data
- Photoperiod: 12 hrs light/2 hrs dark/8 hrs off/2 hrs dimmed in each 24 hr period.
Study design: in vivo (LLNA)
- Vehicle:
- acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
- Concentration:
- 0 (control), 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0 and 10.0 % (w/v).
- No. of animals per dose:
- 4
- Details on study design:
- TOPICAL APPLICATION
- Each group of mice was treated by topical application with 25µL of the test or control substance to the dorsal surface of each ear for 3 consecutive days.
ADMINISTRATION OF ³HTdR
- 5 days after the first topical application, mice were administered with 20mCi ³HTdR in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) by intravenous tail vein injection with 250µL of 80µCi/mL ³HTdR (78.9µCi/µL ³HTdR following activity confirmation). The tail veins were visualised by placing the mice in a warm air environment for a few minutes.
DETERMINATION OF INCORPORATED ³HTdR
- Approx. 5 hr after ³HTdR injection all mice were sacrificed by CO₂ asphyxiation.
- The draining auricular lymph nodes were rapidly excised and pooled for each experimental group (8 nodes/group) into 1mL of phosphate buffered saline (PBS).
- Single cell suspensions (SCSs) of pooled lymph node cells (LNC) were prepared by gentle mechanical disaggregation of pooled lymph nodes through stainless steel gauze (200 mesh size) using a 5mL ‘B-D discardit’ syringe plunger in a petri dish.
- Approximately 8mL of PBS were subsequently used to wash the mesh and swill the petri dish before each group of pooled LNC SCS was recovered by aspiration, transferred into a centrifuge tube and made up to 10ml with PBS. Pooled LNC were pelleted by centrifugation at 190g (RCF) for 10 mins and the supernatants removed by aspiration before resuspending each LNC pellet with 10mL of PBS. This washing procedure was repeated twice before resuspending each LNC pellet in 3ml of 5% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) for precipitation of macromolecules.
- After incubation with 5 % TCA at 4°C overnight, each precipitate was pelleted and resuspended in 1mL of 5 % TCA. After transferring the precipitates to glass scintillation vials with 10mL of ‘Optiphase mp’ scintillation liquid ³HTdR incorporation was measured on a β-scintillation counter.
- Similarly, background ³HTdR levels were also measured in two 1mL aliquots of 5 % TCA.
- The β-scintillation counter expresses ³HTdR incorporation as the number of radioactive disintegrations per minute (DPM).
INTERPRETATION OF RAW DATA
- The proliferative responses of LNC were expressed as the number of radioactive disintegrations per minute per lymph node (DPM/node) and as the ratio of ³HTdR incorporation into LNC of test lymph nodes relative to that recorded for control lymph nodes (Stimulation Index- SI).
- Before DPM/node values were determined, mean background DPM was subtracted from test and control DPM raw data.
- A test substance was regarded as a sensitiser in the LLNA if the following criteria were fulfilled:
--1. that exposure to at least 1 concentration of the test substance resulted in an incorporation of ³HTdR at least 3-fold or greater than that recorded in the control mice, as indicated by the SI.
--2. that the data were not incompatible with a conventional biological dose response, although allowance would have been made (especially at high topical application concentrations) for either local toxicity or immunological suppression.
Results and discussion
In vivo (LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Parameter:
- EC3
- Value:
- 10
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 1.4
- Test group / Remarks:
- concentration 0.5%
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 1.3
- Test group / Remarks:
- concentration 1%
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 1.3
- Test group / Remarks:
- concentration 2.5%
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 2.4
- Test group / Remarks:
- concentration 5%
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 3
- Test group / Remarks:
- concentration 10%
Any other information on results incl. tables
2-methylundecanal in AOO elicited a positive lymphocyte response (Stimulation Index (SI) ≥ 3) at 10.0 % which gave a SI of 3.0. The response was negative (SI < 3) at the other concentrations tested (0.5 %, 1.0 %, 2.5 % and 5.0 %). EC3 = 10. There was evidence of a dose response.
Background count - 66 DPM. DPMs (less background count): 0 % - 3406 dpm, 0.5 % - 4794 dpm, 1.0 % - 4427 dpm, 2.5 % - 4572 dpm, 5.0 % - 8041 dpm, 10.0 % - 10090 dpm
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1B (indication of skin sensitising potential) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- The test substance was assessed for skin sensitisation according to OECD guideline 429. The test material was found to be sensitising to skin at 10 % w/v.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
