Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
other: (robust) study summaries provided by ECHA
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1997
Report date:
1997

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: 92/69/EEC (Maximisation)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
(robust) study summaries provided by ECHA

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-(1-H-benzotriazol-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium tetrafluoroborate
EC Number:
423-040-4
EC Name:
2-(1-H-benzotriazol-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium tetrafluoroborate
Cas Number:
125700-67-6
Molecular formula:
C11H16N5O.BF4
IUPAC Name:
[(1H-1,2,3-benzotriazol-1-yloxy)(dimethylamino)methylidene]dimethylazanium; tetrafluoroboranuide
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
other: Alembicol D
Concentration / amount:
Intradermal injection: 10% w/v in Alembicol D
Adequacy of induction:
not specified
Challenge
No.:
#1
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
other: Alembicol D
Concentration / amount:
10% w/v in Alembicol D
No. of animals per dose:
Number of animals in test group: 10
Number of animals in negative control group: 5

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
30%
No. with + reactions:
9
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 30 %. No with. + reactions: 9.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
60%
No. with + reactions:
10
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 60 %. No with. + reactions: 10.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
30%
No. with + reactions:
8
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 30 %. No with. + reactions: 8.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
60%
No. with + reactions:
1
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 60 %. No with. + reactions: 1.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
30%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 30 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
60%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 60 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
30%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 30 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0

Any other information on results incl. tables

Maximum concentration not causing irritating effects in preliminary test: 60 %

Signs of irritation during induction:

Intradermal injections: Slight irritation was seen in test

and control animals.

Topical application: Slight erythema was seen in test and

control animals.

Evidence of sensitisation of each challenge concentration:

10/10 animals.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met