Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Justification for type of information:
Data is from publication.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Mutagenicity Testing of Di (2- ethylhexyl)phthalate and Related Chemicals in Salmonella
Author:
Errol Zeiger, Steve Haworth, Kristien Mortelmans, and William Speck
Year:
1985
Bibliographic source:
Environmental Mutagenesis 7:213-232 (1985)

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: AS mention below
Principles of method if other than guideline:
To evaluate the mutagenic potential of Dioctyl phthalate in Salmonella Typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, and TAl00 by Ames test.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Dioctyl phthalate
EC Number:
204-214-7
EC Name:
Dioctyl phthalate
Cas Number:
117-84-0
Molecular formula:
C24H38O4
IUPAC Name:
1, 2-dioctyl benzene-1, 2-dicarboxylate
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Details on test material
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Dioctyl phthalate
- Substance type: Organic

Method

Target gene:
Histidine
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium, other: TA1535, TA1537, TA98, and TAl00
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
Not applicable
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Cytokinesis block (if used):
not specified
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Liver homogenates (S-9 fraction) from Aroclor 1254-induced male Sprague-Dawley rats (RLI) or male Syrian hamsters (HLI).
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
100-10000µg/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
Vehicle
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO
True negative controls:
not specified
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: TA1535 and TA100, sodium azide; TA98, 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine;a nd TA1537, 9-aminoacridine. 2-Aminoanthracene was used as the positive control for metabolic activation in all strains.
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
Details on test system and conditions
METHOD OF APPLICATION: Preincubation method

DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 min
- Exposure duration: 3Days
Rationale for test conditions:
Not specified.
Evaluation criteria:
The strains were evaluated for dose dependent increase in the number of reveretants\plate.
Statistics:
Mean ±Standard deviations for strains were observed.

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium, other: strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, and TAl00
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
not specified
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:The final dose level selection was based on the results of a preliminary range-finding study conducted with TAl00 in the presence and absence of S-9.
Remarks on result:
other: No mutagenic effect were observed.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 17:Di-Octyl Phthalate (Lab:SRI solvent : DMSO)

TA lOO

Dose

       NA

        

10% HLI

(-)

 

10%RLI

(-)

 

µg/PLATE

MEAN

SEM

MEAN

SEM

MEAN

SEM

0.000

 

   114

4.3

118

5.0

103

5.4

100.000

 

124

10.9

120

4.7

109

11.7

333.000

 

103

3.8

105

6.9

105

10.7

1000.000

 

105

4.0

109

5.7

110

0.6

3333.000

 

97

7.0

105

2.6

101

7.2

10000.000

 

111

7.9

100

3.2

107

12.4

POS

331

13.6

1290

45.3

551

3.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

TA1535

Dose

       NA

        

10% HLI

(-)

 

10%RLI

(-)

 

µg/PLATE

MEAN

SEM

MEAN

SEM

MEAN

SEM

0.000

 

  24

2.3

8

3.0

12

1.3

100.000

 

23

4.0

13

2.0

11

1.2

333.000

 

21

5.7

6

1.2

7

2.5

1000.000

 

22

4.0

12

2.2

8

2.4

3333.000

 

19

2.9

10

1.8

12

2.3

10000.000

 

17

1.5

10

2.5

7

0.7

POS

209

16.2

359

24.8

279

18.0


 

 

 

 

 

 

TA1537

Dose

       NA

        

10% HLI

(-)

 

10%RLI

(-)

 

µg/PLATE

MEAN

SEM

MEAN

SEM

MEAN

SEM

0.000

 

  7

0.0

4

0.7

10

2.5

100.000

 

6

1.5

6

0.3

11

1.8

333.000

 

5

2.0

7

0.6

8

2.4

1000.000

 

7

0.9

9

2.0

5

0.6

3333.000

 

7

0.9

6

2.8

10

2.2

10000.000

 

4

1.2

5

0.7

9

3.7

POS

269

14.7

345

15.0

244

17.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TA98

Dose

       NA

        

10% HLI

(-)

 

10%RLI

(-)

 

µg/PLATE

MEAN

SEM

MEAN

SEM

MEAN

SEM

0.000

 

  13

0.9

31

3.0

25

0.9

100.000

 

14

1.7

33

1.8

30

3.3

333.000

 

13

2.6

29

5.3

29

1.9

1000.000

 

18

1.8

29

1.9

26

1.2

3333.000

 

18

2.1

30

4.7

17

2.7

10000.000

 

18

1.5

26

3.8

20

2.4

POS

621

56.6

1027

53.1

382

27.0

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Dioctyl phthalate (117-84-0) was evaluated for its mutagenic potential in Salmonella Typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, and TAl00 by Ames test. The test result was considered to be negative in the presence and absence of S9.
Executive summary:

Dioctyl phthalate was assessed for its possible mutagenic potential. For this purpose bacterial reverse mutation assay was performed on Salmonella Typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, and TAl00. The test substance was exposed at the test concentration of 100-10000µg/plate byPreincubation method. The test was conducted in the presence and absences of S9.No mutagenic effect were observed in all strain both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. ThereforeDioctyl phthalate was considered to be non mutagenic in bacterial reverse mutation assay. Hence the test substance cannot be classified as gene mutant in vitro.