Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-263-4 | CAS number: 118-60-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
LD50(oral, rat): >5000 mg/kg;
LD50(dermal, rat): >5000 mg/kg
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- February 23, 1990 to March 15, 1990
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: guideline test with GLP, well documented
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Animals and Animal Husbandry
Nine male and nine female Sprague-Dawley strain rats were supplied by Bantin & Kingman Ltd., Aldborough, Hull, U.K. At the start of the main study the males weighed 129 - 148g, and the females 120 - 154g, and were approximately five to eight weeks old. After a minimum acclimatisation period of five days the animals were selected at random and given a unique number within the study by ear punching and a number written on a cage card.
The animals were housed in groups of up to five by sex in solid-floor polypropylene cages with sawdust bedding. With the exception of an overnight fast immediately before dosing and for approximately two hours after dosing, free access to mains drinking water and food (Rat and Mouse Expanded Diet No. 1 Special Diet Services Limited, Witham, Essex, U.K.) was allowed throughout the study.
Animals and Animal Husbandry (contd)
The animal room was maintained at a temperature of 21 - 23 °C and relative humidity of 39 - 55%. On one occasion the relative humidity was outside the lower limit specified in the protocol (40%). This did not affect the purpose or integrity of the study. The rate of air exchange was approxi- mately 15 changes per hour and the lighting was controlled by a time switch to give 12 hours light and 12 hours darkness. - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Doses:
- a single dose: 5000 mg/kg
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 males and 5 females
- Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- a) Range-finding Study
In order to establish a suitable dose level for the main study groups of two rats (one male and one female) were treated once only at levels of 5000, 3000, 1000 and 500 mg/kg. Animals were observed 1 and 4 hours after dosing and then daily for five days.
Individual bodyweights were recorded on the day of dosing to allow calculation of individual treatment volumes. No necropsies were performed.
b) Main Study
A group of ten rats (five males and five females) was dosed as follows in order to confirm the findings of the range-finding study.
All animals were dosed once only by gavage using a metal cannula attached to a graduated syringe. The volume administered to each animal was calculated according to its fasted bodyweight at the time of dosing.
Animals were observed 1 and 4 hours after dosing and subsequently once daily for 14 days. Deaths and evidence of overt toxicity were recorded at each observation.
Individual bodyweights were recorded on the day of treatment (day 0) and on days 7 and 14 or at death. - Statistics:
- no data
- Preliminary study:
- No mortality was observed in the range finding study at doses of 500, 1000, 3000 and 5000 mg/kg bw (observation period 5 days). Using the mortaiity data given above the oral LD50 of the test materiai was considered to be greater than 5000 mg/kg bodyweight. This dose level was therefore used for the main study.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 5 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- other: No evidence of toxicity related to test article was observed.
- Mortality:
- There were no deaths.
- Clinical signs:
- other: No evidence of systemic toxicity or skin irritation was noted during the study.
- Gross pathology:
- No abnormalities were noted at necropsy of animals killed at the end of the study.
- Other findings:
- no data
- Interpretation of results:
- not classified
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- LD50 (oral, rat): >5000 mg/kg
- Executive summary:
This acute study was performed to determine the acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test material, administered undiluted in the Sprague-Dawley strain rat. The method used followed that described in the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals (1981) No. 401 "Acute Oral Toxicity". Following a range-finding study, a group of ten fasted animals (five males and five females) was given a single oral dose of test material preparation at a dose level of 5000 mg/kg bodyweight. There were no deaths. No evidence of systemic toxicity or skin irritation was noted during the study. No toxicologically significant effects on bodyweight gain were noted during the study period. No abnormal ties were noted at necropsy of animals killed at the end of the study.
Therefore, the acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test material in the Sprague-Dawley strain rat, was found to be greater than 5000 mg/kg bodyweight under the condition of this study.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 5 000 mg/kg bw
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- February 27, 1990 to March 13, 1990
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: guideline test with GLP, detailed information
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Animals and Animal Husbandry
Five male and five female Sprague-Dawley strain rats were supplied by Bantin & Kingman Ltd., Grimston, Aldborough, Hull, U.K. At the start of the study the males weighed 216 - 227 g, and the females 200 - 213 g and were approximately eight to ten weeks old. After a minimum acclimatisation period of five days the animals were selected at random and given a unique number within the study by ear punching and a number written on a cage card.
The animals were housed in solid-floor polypropylene cages with sawdust bedding and allowed free access to mains drinking water and food (Rat and Mouse Expanded Diet No. 1, Special Diet Services Limited, Witham, Essex, U.K.) throughout the study.
Animals and Animal Husbandry (contd)
The animal room was maintained at a temperature of 21 - 23 °C and relative humidity of 39 - 50%. On one occasion the relative humidity was outside the upper limit specified in the protocol (40%). This did not affect the purpose or integrity of the study. The rate of air exchange was approximately 15 changes per hour and the lighting was controlled by a time switch to give 12 hours light and 12 hours darkness. - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on dermal exposure:
- A group of ten animals (five males and five females), was given a single, 24-hour, semi-occluded dermal application of the test material to intact skin, at a dose level of 5000 mg/kg bodyweight. The appropriate amount of the undiluted test material, as received, was applied uniformly to an area of shorn skin approximating to 10% of the total body surface area using a graduated syringe. A piece of surgical gauze measuring 7 cm x 4 cm was placed over the treatment area and semi-occluded with a piece of self-adhesive bandage (HYPERTIE). The bandage was further secured with a piece of BLENDERM wrapped around each end.
Shortly after dosing the dressings were checked. After the 24-hour contact period the bandage was carefully removed and the treated skin and surrounding hair wiped with cotton wool moistened with distilled water to remove any residual test material. - Duration of exposure:
- 24 hours
- Doses:
- 5000 mg/kg
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Details on study design:
- Approximately twentyfour hours prior to the commencement of the test the back and flanks of each animal were clipped free of hair using veterinary clippers to expose a skin area of approximately 5 cm x 4 cm.
A single group of animals was treated.
Observations
All animals were observed for overt signs of toxicity and death 1 and 4 hours after dosing and subsequently at least once daily for fourteen days.
Individual bodyweights were recorded on the day of treatment (day 0) and on days seven and fourteen.
All animals were subjected to a gross necropsy examination for any macroscopic abnormalities. No tissues were retained. - Statistics:
- no data
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 5 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- other: No adverse effects were observed in test article treated rats.
- Mortality:
- There were no deaths.
- Clinical signs:
- other: No evidence of systemic toxicity or dermal irritation was noted during the study.
- Gross pathology:
- No abnormalities were noted at necropsy of animals killed at the end of the study.
- Other findings:
- no data
- Interpretation of results:
- not classified
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- LD50 (dermal, rat, 24h): > 5000 mg/kg
- Executive summary:
This study was performed to assess the acute dermal toxicity of test article with the method described in the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals (1981) No. 402 "Acute Dermal Toxicity".A group of tenrats (five malesand five females), was given a single, 24-hour, semi-occluded dermal application of the test material tointact skin, at a dose level of 5000 mg/kg bodyweight. There were no deaths. No evidence of systemic toxicity or dermal irritation was noted during the study. Two females showed slight bodyweight loss during the first week. All other animals showed expected gain in bodyweight during the study period. No abnormalities were noted at necropsy of animals killed at the end of the study.
Therefore, based on the results of this study, the acute dermal median lethal dose (LD50) of the test material in the Sprague-Dawley strain rat was considered to be greater than 5000 mg/kg bodyweight.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 5 000 mg/kg bw
Additional information
An acute oral toxicity study is available selecting the limit dose of 5000 mg/kg in rats based on the results of range-finding assay, which followed OECD guideline.There were no deaths. No evidence of systemic toxicity or skin irritation was noted during the study.No toxicologically significant effects on bodyweight gain were noted during the study period. No abnormal ties were noted at necropsy of animals killed at the end of the study.
In a dermal toxicity study, rats were given a single, 24-hour, semi-occluded dermal application of the test material to intact skin, at a dose level of 5000 mg/kg body weight.There were no deaths. No evidence of systemic toxicity or dermal irritation was noted during the study. Two females showed slight bodyweight loss during the first week. All other animals showed expected gain in bodyweight during the study period.No abnormalities were noted at necropsy of animals killed at the end of the study.
Therefore, based on the results of this study, the acute oral and dermal median lethal dose (LD50) of the test material in the Sprague-Dawley strain rat was considered to be greater than 5000 mg/kg body weight.
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – oral endpoint
Only key study available
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – dermal endpoint
Only key study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Under the experimental condition, test article failed to cause acute toxicity by oral and dermal application. Therefore, it is concluded that test article is not to be classified according to CLP (Regulation EC No.1272/2008) and DSD (Directive 67/548/EEC).
According to regulation (EC) 1907/2006 Annex XI (weight of evidence), testing for acute inhalation toxicity is not considered to be required, for the following reasons: - 2-ethylhexyl salicylate has a negligible vapour pressure. Thus an acute 4-hour inhalation study would be carried out at the limit dose of 5 mg/L aerosol. Assuming a very conservative value of 100% bioavailability, a rat would receive a systemic dose of 0.8 L/min/kg x 240 min x 5 mg/L aerosol = 960 mg/kg. - Since the acute oral LD50 was higher than this value, it is considered unlikely that mortality would be observed in an acute inhalation study. In the acute oral toxicity study no effects were observed at the limit dose of 5000 mg/kg. - With regard to possible local respiratory effects, 2-ethylhexyl salicylate is not classified for eye irritation and showed no irritation effects on the mucosal membranes of the eyes. Upon occluded application to the skin, 2-ethylhexyl salicylate showed irritative effects to the skin. In conclusion, 2-ethylhexyl salicylate is considered unlikely to exert a relevant local irritative effect on respiratory mucosal membranes. Therefore, performance of an acute inhalation study is considered not necessary for scientific reasons and 2-ethylhexyl salicylate is considered unlikely to exert effects upon inhalation that would require classification according to Council Directive 2001/59/EC (28th ATP of Directive 67/548/EEC) and according to CLP (Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
2-ethylhexyl salicylate does not have to be classified for specific target organ toxicity – single exposure according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, as no specific toxic effects were observed after acute exposure.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
