Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1967-03-22 to 1967-04-14
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study predating guidelines and GLP, but scientifically fully acceptable.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1967
Report date:
1967

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Deviations:
not applicable
Principles of method if other than guideline:
other: BASF test (close to Draize test), occlusive, 3 rabbits, intact skin, 20 h exposure (among others)
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
4-acetylmorpholine
EC Number:
216-913-4
EC Name:
4-acetylmorpholine
Cas Number:
1696-20-4
Molecular formula:
C6H11NO2
IUPAC Name:
1-(morpholin-4-yl)ethan-1-one
Details on test material:
- Name of test material: N-Acetylmorpholin

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
Vienna White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 2.83 kg (male); 3.10 kg (female); 2.72 kg (male)

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- no data

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 1967-03-29 To: 1967-04-14

Test system

Type of coverage:
occlusive
Preparation of test site:
not specified
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
undiluted (2 mL / animal (corresponds to 2.23 g)
Duration of treatment / exposure:
1, 5 or 20 minutes
20 hours (data selected as worst case for 4 h test)
Observation period:
Animal 1 (male, 7.6.645): 8 days, (day 3 and 4 lacking)
Animal 2 (female, 6.6.571): 5 days, (day 3 and 4 lacking)
Animal 3 (male, 5.6.427): 3 days
Number of animals:
3 rabbits
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: at six sites per rabbit along the dorsum (plus left ear, not considered)
- % coverage: approximately 6 cm2 each


REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: yes, mild detergent (50% Lutrol)


SCORING SYSTEM: Draize score (converted from recorded grading with detailed instructions provided by data owner)

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 24 h, 48 h, and 5, 6, 7, 8 days (mean)
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: Exposure duration 20 h (instead of 4 h, OECD 404)
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: 24 h, 48 h and 5 days (mean)
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: Exposure duration 20 h (instead of 4 h, OECD 404)
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
other: 24 h, 48 h, 72 h (mean)
Score:
0.66
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 h
Remarks on result:
other: Exposure duration 20 h (instead of 4 h, OECD 404)
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 24 h, 48 h, and 5, 6, 7, 8 days (mean)
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: Exposure duration 20 h (instead of 4 h, OECD 404)
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: 24 h, 48 h, and 5, 6, 7, 8 days (mean)
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: Exposure duration 20 h (instead of 4 h, OECD 404)
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
other: 24 h, 48, 72 h (mean)
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: Exposure duration 20 h (instead of 4 h, OECD 404)
Irritant / corrosive response data:
not irritating (minimal signs of skin irritation (erythema grade 1) were noted after the 20 h exposure period in one animal at the 24h and 48h reading).

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU