Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates

Administrative data

Endpoint:
short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
other information
Study period:
2001
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
secondary literature

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2001
Reference Type:
other: Draft Renewal Assessment Report under Regulation (EC) 1107/2009
Title:
Draft Renewal Assessment Report under Regulation (EC) 1107/2009 - Tritosulfuron
Year:
2018
Bibliographic source:
Draft Renewal Assessment Report under Regulation (EC) 1107/2009

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 202 (Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPP 72-2 (Aquatic Invertebrate Acute Toxicity Test)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 850.1010 (Aquatic Invertebrate Acute Toxicity Test, Freshwater Daphnids)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: EEC 79/831
Principles of method if other than guideline:
No deviations from the current guideline.
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
4-methoxy-6-(trifluoromethyl)-1,3,5-triazin-2-amine
EC Number:
610-962-9
Cas Number:
5311-05-7
Molecular formula:
C5H5F3N4O
IUPAC Name:
4-methoxy-6-(trifluoromethyl)-1,3,5-triazin-2-amine

Sampling and analysis

Analytical monitoring:
yes

Test solutions

Details on test solutions:
5 test concentrations plus control, 4 replicates per concentration with 5 daphnid in each; assessment of immobility after 24 hours and at the end of the test after 48 hours. Control, 10, 18, 32, 56 and 100 mg/L (nominal). Glass vessels; test volume 50 mL,

Test organisms

Test organisms (species):
Daphnia magna
Details on test organisms:
Waterflea (Daphnia magna STRAUS), neonates collected from in house culture, age at test initiation less than 24 hours; culture conditions in accordance with test conditions.

Study design

Test type:
static
Water media type:
other: synthetic water “M4” (Elendt medium)
Total exposure duration:
48 h

Test conditions

Hardness:
total hardness 2.52 mmol/L
Test temperature:
20 °C – 21 °C
pH:
8.1 - 8.2
Dissolved oxygen:
8.4 - 8.5 mg/L
Conductivity:
655 μS/cm
Details on test conditions:
photoperiod 16 hours light : 8 hours dark; light intensity: < 1500 lux; no feeding, no ventilation

Results and discussion

Effect concentrations
Duration:
48 h
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect conc.:
> 100 mg/L

Any other information on results incl. tables

Tables are attached separately

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Conclusion of the DAR (2001-2007): 48 h EC50 of > 100 mg a.s./L
Executive summary:

Analytical measurements: Analytical verification of test substance concentration was conducted in each concentration at the beginning and at the end of the test. Measured values at test initiation ranged from 98.9% to 100.8% (average 99.9%) of nominal and from 97.8% to 99% (average 98.6%) of nominal at test termination, confirming the theoretical concentrations. Therefore, the following biological results are based on nominal concentrations.


 


In a 48 hours static acute toxicity study with Daphnia magna the EC50 (48 h) of BH 635-5 was determined to be > 100 mg/L, the EC0 (48 h) was 100 mg/L (nominal).
Biological results: No significant immobility of the daphnids was observed (one immobile daphnia at 32 mg/L after 48 hours). No other substance-related effects were observed.


 


The study was effectively also conducted in compliance with the later version of the guideline, OECD TG 202 (2004), and fulfilled the validty criteria. Analytical measurements to confirm that the test concentrations remained at least 80% of nominal throughout the test period were done. We agree with the endpoint relevant for risk assessment, 48 h EC50 > 100 mg AMTT/L (nom), 48 h NOEC 100 mg AMTT/L (nom).