Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 466-490-7 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Study initiation date - 11 May 2006; Experiment start date - 08 June 2006; Experiment completion date - 24 July 2006; Study completion date - 19 September 2006.
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 006
- Report date:
- 2006
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Commission Directive 2000/32/EC, L1362000, Annex 4A: "Mutagenicity - In vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test", dated May 19, 2000
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
- Version / remarks:
- "Kanpoan No. 287 - Environmental Agency" "Eisei No. 127 - Ministry of Health & Welfare" "Heisei 09/10/31 Kikyoku No. 2 - Ministry of International Trade & Industry".
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Test material form:
- other: solid
- Details on test material:
- Colour: Black
Molecular Weight: 1272.7 g/mol as free acid
Purity: Content of organic part (Na-salt): approx. 80 %;Oligomers: 13 %;Main component: approx. 53 %
Solubility in Water: Approx > 100 g/L at room temperature
Stability in Solvent: Stable for 7 days in water, saline, polyethylene glycol, and CMC at room temperature
Storage: At room temperature in the desiccator
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Identity: FAT 40827/A
Batch: T2 5572 BOP 01/06
Purity: determined in this study
Appearance: black sticky powder
Expiration date: 28.02.2011
Storage: at room temperature
Method
- Target gene:
- Structural chromosome aberrations
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 (Preparation by RCC Cytotest Cell Research)
Phenobarbital/ß-Naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9 was used as the metabolic activation system. The S9 was prepared from 8 - 1 2 weeks old male Wistar Hanlbm rats, weight approx. 220 - 320 g induced by applications of 80 mg/kg b.w. Phenobarbital i.p. (Desitin; 22335 Hamburg, Germany) and ß-Naphthoflavone p.o. (Aldrich, 89555 Steinheim, Germany), each on three consecutive days. The livers were prepared 24 hours after the last treatment. The S9 fractions were produced by dilution of the liver homogenate with a KCl solution (1:3 parts) followed by centrifugation at 9000 g. Aliquots of the supernatant were frozen and stored in ampoules at -80° C. Small numbers of the ampoules were kept at -20 °C for up to one week. The protein concentration was 30.6 mg/mL (Lot no. 091205) in the pre-experiment and 29.3 mg/mL (Lot no. 190506) in the main experiment.
S9 Mix
An appropriate quantity of S9 supernatant was thawed and mixed with S9 cofactor solution to result in a final protein concentration of 0.75 mg/mL in the cultures. Cofactors were added to the S9 mix to reach the following concentrations:
8mM MgCI2
33 mM KCl
5 mM glucose-6-phosphate
4mM NADP
in 100 mM sodium-ortho-phosphate-buffer, pH 7.4.
During the experiment the S9 mix was stored in an ice bath. The S9 mix preparation was performed according to Ames et al. - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- The applied concentrations in the pre-test on toxicity were 39.1, 78.1, 156.3, 312.5, 625.0, 1250.0, 2500.0 and 5000 µg/mL.
The applied concentrations in the cytogenetic experiments were 19.5, 39.1, 78.1, 156.3, 312.5 and 625.0 µg/mL. - Vehicle / solvent:
- deionised water
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- deionised water
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation - 400 µg/mL (3.2 mM)
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- deionised water
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation - 1.4 µg/mL(5.0 µM)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Large stocks of the V79 cell line were stored in liquid nitrogen in the cell bank of RCC. Before freezing each batch was screened for mycoplasm contamination and checked for karyotype stability. Consequently, the parameters of the experiments remain similar because of standardized characteristics of the cells. Thawed stock cultures were propagated at 37 °C in 80 cm² plastic flasks. About 5x 105 cells per flask were seeded into 15 mL of MEM supplemented with 10 % fetal calf serum. The cells were sub-cultured twice weekly. The cell cultures were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 1.5 % carbon dioxide.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: Single
- Number of independent experiments: Two
METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Cell density at seeding: 41530 cells/slide
- Test substance added in medium: preincubation.
TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Preincubation period, if applicable: 18h
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: 4h
FOR CHROMOSOME ABERRATION AND MICRONUCLEUS:
- Spindle inhibitor: Colchicine (0.2 µg/mL) - 2.5 hrs.
- Methods of slide preparation and staining technique used including the stain used (for cytogenetic assays):
- Number of cells spread and analysed per concentration (number of replicate cultures and total number of cells scored):
- Criteria for scoring micronucleated cells (selection of analysable cells and micronucleus identification):
- Methods, such as kinetochore antibody binding, to characterize whether micronuclei contain whole or fragmented chromosomes (if applicable):
- Criteria for scoring chromosome aberrations (selection of analysable cells and aberration identification):
- Determination of polyploidy:
- Determination of endoreplication:
FOR GENE MUTATION:
- Expression time (cells in growth medium between treatment and selection):
- Selection time (if incubation with a selective agent):
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells):
- Method used: agar or microwell plates for the mouse lymphoma assay.
- If a selective agent is used (e.g., 6-thioguanine or trifluorothymidine), indicate its identity, its concentration and, duration and period of cell exposure.
- Number of cells seeded and method to enumerate numbers of viable and mutants cells:
- Criteria for small (slow growing) and large (fast growing) colonies:
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method, e.g.: background growth inhibition; mitotic index (MI); relative population doubling (RPD); relative increase in cell count (RICC); replication index; cytokinesis-block proliferation index; cloning efficiency; relative total growth (RTG); relative survival (RS); other:
- Any supplementary information relevant to cytotoxicity:
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENTS OF GENOTOXICIY
- OTHER: - Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is classified as non-clastogenic if:
- the number of induced structural chromosome aberrations in all evaluated dose groups is in the range of our historical control data (0.0 - 4.0 % aberrant cells, exclusive gaps)
- and/or no significant increase of the number of structural chromosome aberrations is observed.
A test item is classified as clastogenic if:
- the number of induced structural chromosome aberrations is not in the range of our historical control data (0.0 - 4.0 % aberrant cells, exclusive gaps)
- and either a concentration-related or a significant increase of the number of structural chromosome aberrations is observed.
Statistical significance was confirmed by means of the Fisher's exact test (9) (p <0.05). However, both biological and statistical significance should be considered together. If the criteria mentioned above for the test item are not clearly met, the classification with regard to the historical data and the biological relevance is discussed and/or a confirmatory experiment is performed.
Although the inclusion of the structural chromosome aberrations is the purpose of this study, it is important to include the polyploids and endoreduplications. The following criteria is valid. A test item can be classified as aneugenic if:
- the number of induced numerical aberrations is not in the range of our historical control data (0.0 - 8.5 % polyploid cells). - Statistics:
- Statistical significance at the five per cent level (p < 0.05) was evaluated by means of the
Fisher's exact test.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the experimental conditions reported, the test item induced structural chromosome aberrations as determined by the chromosome aberration test in V79 cells (Chinese hamster cell line) in vitro.
- Executive summary:
In a GLP compliant study conducted according to OECD test guideline 473, the test item, dissolved in deionised water, was assessed for its potential to induce structural chromosome aberrations in V79 cells of the Chinese hamster in vitro in one experiment.
The following study design was performed:
Exposure period: 4hrs; Recovery: 14hrs; Preparation interval: 18hrs; With and without S9 mix.
In each experimental group two parallel cultures were set up. Per culture at least 100 metaphase plates were scored for structural chromosome aberrations.
The applied concentrations in the pre-test on toxicity were 39.1, 78.1, 156.3, 312.5, 625.0, 1250.0, 2500.0 and 5000 µg/mL.
The applied concentrations in the cytogenetic experiments were 19.5, 39.1, 78.1, 56.3, 156.3, 312.5 and 625.0 µg/mL.
In the main experiment, in the absence and presence of S9 mix, concentrations showing clear cytotoxicity were not evaluable for cytogenetic damage. In the absence and the presence of S9 mix, statistically significant and biologically relevant increases in the number of cells carrying structural chromosomal aberrations were observed after treatment with the test item. No relevant increase in the frequencies of polyploid metaphases was found after treatment with the test item as compared to the frequencies of the controls. Appropriate mutagens were used as positive controls. They induced statistically significant increases (p <0.05) in cells with structural chromosome aberrations.
Therefore, test item was considered to be clastogenic in this chromosome aberration test in the absence and presence of S9 mix.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
Welcome to the ECHA website. This site is not fully supported in Internet Explorer 7 (and earlier versions). Please upgrade your Internet Explorer to a newer version.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.
Find out more on how we use cookies.