Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2017

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
EU method B.47 (Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test method for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), .alpha.,.alpha.'-(iminodi-2,1-ethanediyl)bis[.omega.-hydroxy-, N-[3-(C10-16-alkyloxy)propyl] derivs., di-Et sulfate-quaternized
EC Number:
615-231-8
Cas Number:
70983-58-3
Molecular formula:
UVCB
IUPAC Name:
Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), .alpha.,.alpha.'-(iminodi-2,1-ethanediyl)bis[.omega.-hydroxy-, N-[3-(C10-16-alkyloxy)propyl] derivs., di-Et sulfate-quaternized
Test material form:
liquid: viscous
Details on test material:
Name: Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), .alpha.,.alpha.'-(iminodi-2,1-ethanediyl)bis[.omega.-hydroxy-, N-[3-(C10-16-alkyloxy)propyl] derivs., di-Et sulfate-quaternized
Product Description: C10-16-alkyletherpropylamine, ethoxylated, DES Quat
CAS No.: 70983-58-3
Physical state: yellowish to amber viscous liquid at 20 °C
Batch No.: PFS-755-173
Re-certification date of batch: 19 April 2018
Purity: 100 % (UVCB)
Color, Gardner 8.8
pH, 5% in water 5.76
Acid Value , mg KOH/g 20.1
Moisture, % 0.127
Total Amine, mg/g 11.18
Viscosity,cps, #4@60,25C 3280
Appearance @25C pass
Stability: stable under test conditions
Storage condition of test material: Room temperature, protected from light




Specific details on test material used for the study:
Name: Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), .alpha.,.alpha.'-(iminodi-2,1-ethanediyl)bis[.omega.-hydroxy-, N-[3-(C10-16-alkyloxy)propyl] derivs., di-Et sulfate-quaternized
Product Description: C10-16-alkyletherpropylamine, ethoxylated, DES Quat
CAS No.: 70983-58-3
Physical state: yellowish to amber viscous liquid at 20 °C
Batch No.: PFS-755-173
Re-certification date of batch: 19 April 2018
Purity: 100 % (UVCB)
Color, Gardner 8.8
pH, 5% in water 5.76
Acid Value , mg KOH/g 20.1
Moisture, % 0.127
Total Amine, mg/g 11.18
Viscosity,cps, #4@60,25C 3280
Appearance @25C pass
Stability: stable under test conditions
Storage condition of test material: Room temperature, protected from light

Test system

Vehicle:
physiological saline
Controls:
yes, concurrent positive control
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount / concentration applied:
750 µL of the test substance or the control substance.
The viscosity of the test item was relatively high, it was applied directly onto the cornea by removing the window-locking ring and glass window prior to treatment.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
750 µL of the test substance or the control substance was introduced into the anterior chamber. As the viscosity of the test item was relatively high, it was applied directly onto the cornea by removing the window-locking ring and glass window prior to treatment. After 10 minutes incubation at 32 +- 1 °C either the test substance or the control substance was removed and the epithelium washed at least three times with MEM (containing phenol red). Once the medium was free of test substance, the cornea was finally rinsed with complete RPMI (without phenol red).
Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
The cornea was finally rinsed with complete RPMI (without phenol red). The anterior chamber expect of cornea no. 8 was refilled with complete RPMI and an illuminance measurement was performed after 2 hours incubation at 32 +- 1 °C. Also, each cornea was observed visually and pertinent observations were recorded.
After the illuminance measurement was performed, the medium was removed from both chambers of the holder. The posterior chamber was refilled with fresh complete RPMI. 1 mL of a 4 mg/mL sodium fluorescein solution was added to the anterior chamber and the corneas were incubated for 90 minutes at 32 +- 1 °C. Then the medium from the posterior chamber was removed and its optical density at 490 nm (OD490) was determined, using a spectrophotometer (UV/VIS).
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3 corneas for the test item
3 corneas as negative controls treated with physiological saline 0.9% NaCl
3 corneas as positive controls treated with ethanol 100%

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
mean value of 3 corneas
Value:
152.17
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
other: The positive control is slightly increased (deviation of 5.47 SD) in comparison to the two standard deviations of the current historical mean. The deviation of the positive control did not influence the quality or integrity of the study.
Other effects / acceptance of results:
The positive control is slightly increased (deviation of 5.47 SD) in comparison to the two standard deviations of the current historical mean. The deviation of the positive control did not influence the quality or integrity of the study.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Results

The eye irritancy potential of the test item was investigated in the bovine corneal opacity and permeability assay. The test item was tested as provided by the sponsor. All of the 3 corneas treated with the test item showed strong opacity of the tissue.The following mean in vitro irritation score was calculated: 152.17

Therefore the test item was classified into UN GHS Category 1.

The positive control is slightly increased (deviation of 5.47 SD) in comparison of the two standard deviations of the current historical mean. The deviation of the positive control did not influence the quality or integrity of the present study and therefore this assay is considered valid. The negative control response resulted in opacity and permeability values that are less than the established upper limits for background bovine corneas treated with the respective negative control.

Table 1: In Vitro Irritation Score

 Cornea No.  Test item  Corrected opacity  Corrected OD490 value  IVIS
 1  Negative control  0.49  0.006  -
 2  Negative control  2.01  0.011  -
 3  Negative control  1.26  0.034  -
 MV  Negative control  0.93  0.017  1.18
 4  Positive control  26.38  3.788  -
 5  Positive control  26.62  2.753  -
 6  Positive control  28.97  2.898  -
 MV  Positive control  27.33  3.146  74.52
 7  Test item  86.80  5.068  -
 8  Test item  101.09  3.358  -
 9  Test item  79.86  4.158  -
 MV  Test item  89.25  4.195

 152.17

MV = mean value

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
According to the evaluation criteria the test item is classified into UN GHS Category 1.
Executive summary:

The eye irritancy potential of the test item was investigated in the bovine corneal opacity and permeability assay. The following mean in vitro irritation score was calculated to 152.17.

Therefore the test item was classified into UN GHS Category 1.