Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
48h
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2014
Report date:
2014

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals Part 471, adopted 21. Jul. 1997 "Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test"
EU-Guideline B. 13/14 adopted 31. May 2008 "Mutagenicity - Reverse mutation test using bacteria"
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
certified by Landesamt für Umwelt, Wasserwirtschaft und Gewerbeaufsicht Rheinland-Pfalz, Kaiser-Friedrich-Str. 7, D-55116 Mainz, Germany
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
4-(methylamino)pentane-2-ol dibenzoate
EC Number:
807-124-1
Cas Number:
1519029-23-2
Molecular formula:
C20H23NO3
IUPAC Name:
4-(methylamino)pentane-2-ol dibenzoate
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Specific details on test material used for the study:
4-8methylamino)pentan-2-ol dibenzoate, CAS-No.: 15 19029-23-2, monoconstituent substance, stable at room temperature, solid, soluble in DMSO
batch No. STCB/226/14, purity: 96.06%, production date: Jun. 2014

Method

Target gene:
Histidine deficiency: hisD6610 (frame shift), present in TA97a / hisD3052 (frame shift) present in TA98 / hisG46 (base pair substitutrion) present in TA100 and TA1535 / hisG428 (base pair substitution) present in TA102
UV sensitivity, biotine deficiency: uvrB (deletion) present in TA97a, TA98, TA100 and TA1535
lipopolysaccharide side chain deficiency: rfa (deletion) present in TA97a, TA98, TA100, TA102 and TA1535
ampicillin resistance: pKM101 (plasmide) present in TA97a, TA98, TA100 and TA102
tetracyclin resistance: pAQ1 (plasmide) present in TA102
Species / strainopen allclose all
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium, other: TA97a
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
other: hisD6610, uvrB, rfa, pKM101
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
other: hisD3052, uvrB, rfa, pKM101
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
other: hisG46, uvrB, rfa, pKM101
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 102
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
other: hisG428, rfa, pKM101, pAQ1
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
other: hisG46, uvrB, rfa
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9-Mix (from livers of male Sprague-Dawley rats treated with Aroclor), obtained by Trinova BioChem, Gießen
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
first experiment (plate incorporation method): 1500 / 500 / 150 / 50 / 15 µg/plate
second experiment (pre-incubation method): 1500 / 750 / 375 / 188 / 94 / 47 µg/plate
top dose is not cytotoxic
Vehicle / solvent:
DMSO
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
water
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
solvent: DMSO
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other:
Remarks:
A genotype confirmation was performed. Also a toxicity control (maximal dose on maximal agar) ans sterility control (without bacteria) were perfomed too.
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
2 experiments were perfomed. Per strain and dose, 4 plates with and without S9-mix were used.
Spontaneous revertants were detected in 4 replicates (with or without S9 mix) for each solvent used in the test.
In the first experiment the plate incorporation method was used: All materials (100µl test solution at each dose level, negative or positive control + 500 µl S9 mix or phosphate buffer + 100 µl bacteria suspension + 2000 µl overlay agar) were gently vortexed in a test tube and then poured onto the selective agar plates.
The second experiment was performed in the pre-incubation method. All test materials (100 µl test solutions, 500 µl S9 mix or phosphate buffer and 100 µl bacteria suspension) were vortexed and incubated for 20 minutes in selective test tubes. Then the test tubes were poured onto agar plates and 2000 µl overlay agar was added.
Then all the agar plates were closed and placed in the dark incubator at 37°C for 48h. The colonies were counted visually.


Rationale for test conditions:
according to guideline
Evaluation criteria:
The genotype of the bacteria was confirmed. The highest dose of the test item showed no signs of toxicity towards the bacteria. The sterility controls and the determination of the titre did not show any inconsistencies. The determined values for the spontaneous revertants of the negative controls were in the normal range. All positive controls showed mutagenic effects with and without metabolic activation. The second experiment confirmed result of the first experiment. So the study was considered valid.
A test item is considered to have mutagenic potential, if a significant, reproducible increase of revertant colonies per plate (increase factor =/> 2) in one strain can be observed. Also a concentration-related increase can be taken as a sign for mutagenicity.
Statistics:
The colonies were counted visually and the numbers were recorded. A spreadsheet software (Microsoft Excel) was used to calculate mean values and standard deviations of each treatment, solvent control and positive control.
The increase factor (f) of revertant induction (mean revertants divided by mean spontaneous revertants) and the absolute number of revertants were calculated.

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium, other: TA97a
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 102
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
not mutagenic under the conditions of this test