Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
18/11/1994 - 15/03/1995
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP, Guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1995
Report date:
1995

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.12 (Mutagenicity - In Vivo Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: JMAFF 59 NohSan no. 4200 (1985)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
micronucleus assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
(RS)-1-methyl-2-nitro-3-(tetrahydro-3-furylmethyl)guanidine
EC Number:
605-399-0
Cas Number:
165252-70-0
Molecular formula:
C7H14N4O3
IUPAC Name:
(RS)-1-methyl-2-nitro-3-(tetrahydro-3-furylmethyl)guanidine
Test material form:
solid: crystalline

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
other: BDF1 (C57BL/6 x DBA/2)
Sex:
male
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Sex: Male
Age/weight at study initiation: Weighing 24.8 – 27.1g
Number of animals per group: 6 males per group

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
0.5% aqueous carboxymethyl cellulose solution
Details on exposure:
2 applications
Duration of treatment / exposure:
2 days
Frequency of treatment:
Daily dosing for 2 days (24 hour interval between applications)
Post exposure period:
24 hours after final treatment
Doses / concentrations
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
0 (vehicle), 270, 540 and 1080 mg/kg/day on 2 consecutive days, 24 hours apart (total doses: 540, 1080 or 2160 mg/kg).
Basis:
nominal conc.
No. of animals per sex per dose:
6 males per group
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Positive control(s):
Single intraperitoneal injection of 2 mg/kg Mitomycin C(MMC), 24 hours before necropsy, as a positive control group.

Examinations

Tissues and cell types examined:
Bone marrow
Details of tissue and slide preparation:
Clinical signs: Yes, after treatment and before sacrifice.

Body weight: Yes, first day of treatment and on the day of sacrifice.

Tissue: Bone marrow:
Number of animals: all animals
Number of cells: 2000
Time points: 24 h after final treatment
Type of cells: Micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in bone marrow

Evaluation criteria:
Parameters: Polychromatic/normochromatic erythrocytes ratio
Statistics:
The incidence of MNPCE was subjected to the shochastic method by Kastenbaum and Bowman, and the ratio of PCE was subjected to the Dunnett's t-test for the analysis of significant differences.

Results and discussion

Test results
Sex:
male
Genotoxicity:
negative
Toxicity:
no effects
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
There were no deaths during the treatment period and no signs of toxicity including body weight change were evident at any dose level. The MNPCE frequencies and PCE/total erythrocyte ratios of all dinotefuran-treated groups were comparable to and not significantly different from control values.
In contrast, mitomycin C produced a statistically significant increase in the MNPCE frequency and a statistically significant decrease in the PCE/total erythrocyte ratio.
Since the incidences of MNPCE and the ratios of PCE/total erythrocytes in both the vehicle control and positive control groups were within the laboratory historical control ranges, the test was considered to be valid.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
Dinotefuran at dose levels approaching the maximum tolerated dose does not induce the formation of micronuclei and does not inhibit spindle formation in the bone marrow of mice.