Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Acute toxicity: via oral route

The LD50 of the test substance

was greater than 2000 mg/kg B.W. (OECD TG423).

 

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

The LD50 of the test substance was greater than 2000 mg/kg B.W. (OECD TG402).

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From August 29, 2016 to January 04, 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
GLP compliance:
yes
Test type:
acute toxic class method
Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Source: BioLASCO Taiwan Co., Ltd (Taipei, Taiwan)
- Age at study initiation: about 8 week old
- Housing: two animals per cage
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 7 days
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 3 °C
- Humidity (%): 55 ± 15%
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12-hrs dark / 12-hrs light cycle
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
water
Doses:
2000 mg/kg B.W.
No. of animals per sex per dose:
For Group 1: Three female
For Group 2: Three female
Key result
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Clinical signs:
other:

Table 1. Body weight of the rats in the study period

Animal I.D.

Dosing volume

(mL)

Body weight (g)

Weight changes

(g)

Day 1

Day 14

Group 1

01F

2.1

206.6

237.9

+31.3

02F

2.1

208.6

241.7

+33.1

03F

2.1

208.6

244.2

+35.6

Group 2

04F

2.2

210.8

242.4

+31.6

05F

2.2

217.2

257.0

+39.8

06F

2.2

217.8

259.6

+41.8

Table 2. Clinical observation of the rats

Animal I.D.

Clinical sign observation

30

mins

4

hrs

D2

D3

D4

D5

D6

D7

D8

D9

D10

D11

D12

D13

D14

Group 1

01F

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

02F

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

03F

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

Group2

04F

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

05F

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

06F

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N: Normal.

D2-D14: Day 2-Day 14 in the study period.

 

Table 3. Results of gross necropsy examination

Animal I.D.

Dose

Gross lesion

Group 1

01F

2,000 mg/kg B.W.

No significant lesion founded

02F

No significant lesion founded

03F

No significant lesion founded

Group 2

04F

2,000 mg/kg B.W.

No significant lesion founded

05F

No significant lesion founded

06F

No significant lesion founded

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
According to OECD 423 test method, the LD50 of Eversorb EP4 was greater than 2000 mg/kg B.W.. Therefore, Eversorb EP4 was Category 5 based on GHS criteria. According to CLP, category 5 is not used. The test substance is not classified.
Executive summary:

This test using the procedures outlined in the SuperLab for M62-151100165001EN which is based on the SOP (SOPP-341) for the OECD 423 and OECD 423 (OECD, 2001). A total of 6 female Sprague-Dawley rats were orally dosed with Eversorb EP4 in three animals each group, at 2000 mg/kg b.w. for both Group 1 and Group 2 in limit test. All animals tolerated the test article well with increasing body weights and no mortality or gross lesions findings reported. In absence of mortality or other significant clinical signs of toxicity, LD50 of Eversorb EP4 was greater than 2,000 mg/kg.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Value:
2 000 mg/kg bw

Acute toxicity: via inhalation route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From November 07, 2016 to January 25, 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
GLP compliance:
yes
Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Source: BioLASCO Taiwan Co. Ltd.
- Age at study initiation: about 7-8 weeks old (males); about 9-10 weeks old (females)
- Housing: Animals were individually housed with bedding and an enrichment toy.
- Acclimation period: 6 Days
- Temperature (°C): 21 ± 2 °C
- Humidity (%): 50 ± 20%
- Photoperiod: 12 hrs dark / 12 hrs light
Type of coverage:
occlusive
Vehicle:
water
Remarks:
Water for Injection (WFI)
Duration of exposure:
24 hours
Doses:
2,000 mg/kg B.W.
No. of animals per sex per dose:
For Group 1: six male and six female
For Group 2: six male and six female
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Key result
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Clinical signs:
other:

Table 1. Clinical Observations

Dose (mg/kg)

0

2000

Group

1

2

Red lacrimation

Male

1/6

1/6

Female

0/6

0/6

Red hair stain on nose

Male

5/6

5/6

Female

3/6

5/6

Skin laceration on neck

Male

0/6

1/6

Female

0/6

0/6

Skin scab/scar on neck/back

Male

1/6

1/6

Female

0/6

0/6

Skin swelling on thorax

Male

0/6

0/6

Female

0/6

1/6

Table 2. Body Weight and Body Weight Gains

Dose (mg/kg)

0

2000

Group

1

2

Male

Body weight (g)

D1

253

253

D15

343

349

Weight gain

Absolute (g)

+90

+96

Relative to D1 (%)

+36%

+38%

Female

Body weight (g)

D1

233

230

D15

266

262

Weight gain

Absolute (g)

+33

+32

Relative to D1 (%)

+14%

+14%

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
According to OECD 402 test method, the LD50 of Eversorb EP4 was greater than 2000 mg/kg B.W.. Therefore, Eversorb EP4 was Category 5 based on GHS criteria. According to CLP, category 5 is not used. The test substance is not classified.
Executive summary:

This test using the procedures outlined in the QPS study for T65316017-GN and OECD 402 (OECD, 1987). Six male and six female Sprague-Dawley rats for each group were used in test. For Dose Group 2, 12 Sprague-Dawley ratsweredermally dosed with 2000 mg/kg B.W. of Eversorb EP4. All animals tolerated the test article well with increasing body weights and no mortality or gross lesions findings reported. In absence of mortality or other significant clinical signs of toxicity, LD50 of Eversorb EP4 was greater than 2,000 mg/kg B.W..

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Value:
2 000 mg/kg bw

Additional information

Acute toxicity: via oral route

A total of 6 female Sprague-Dawley rats were orally dosed withEversorb EP4in three animals each group, at 2000 mg/kg b.w. for both Group 1 and Group 2 in limit test. All animals tolerated the test article well with increasing body weights and no mortality or gross lesions findings reported. In absence of mortality or other significant clinical signs of toxicity, LD50 ofEversorb EP4was greater than 2,000 mg/kg.

 

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Six male and six femaleSprague-Dawley rats for each group were used in test.For Dose group 2, 12Sprague-Dawley ratsweredermally dosed with 2000 mg/kg B.W. ofEversorb EP4. All animals tolerated the test article well with increasing body weights and no mortality or gross lesions findings reported. In absence of mortality or other significant clinical signs of toxicity, LD50 ofEversorb EP4was greater than 2,000 mg/kg B.W..

Justification for classification or non-classification