Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
19 Nov 2014 - 20 Nov 2014
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study conducted to OECD and EC guidelines and in compliance with GLPStudy conducted to OECD and EC guidelines and in compliance with GLP

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2015
Report date:
2015

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Automatically generated during migration to IUCLID 6, no data available
IUPAC Name:
Automatically generated during migration to IUCLID 6, no data available
Test material form:
other: Liquid
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Unjecol 84AN
- Physical state: Liquid
- Analytical purity: 98%
- Lot/batch No.: 5253
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 30 October 2015
- Storage condition of test material: Room Temperature

Test animals

Species:
other: not applicable, in vitro test, human epidermis model
Strain:
other: Not applicable.
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
-Not applicable, as an human epideris model was used.
On receipt, the kit contents were checked and the inserts with tissues on agarose were stored at room temperature until use. The kit was used within the expiry date indicated by the supplier (expiry date: 22 December 2014). The maintenance medium was pre-warmed to 37ºC. The tissues were removed from the agar and placed into wells of 12 well plates containing 2 mL pre-warmed maintenance medium per well. The tissues were incubated for a minimum of 24 hours at 37 ± 2 ºC in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air.

Test system

Type of coverage:
other: Not applicable for In-Vitro tests
Preparation of test site:
other: Not applicable for In-Vitro tests
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not required
Amount / concentration applied:
10 μL neat test substance
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 hr incubation in maintenance medium, doses for 15 min with test substance, negative/positive controls at RT, then rinsing, followed by 42 h of post-incubation period at 37 °C, transfered to wells containing 2mL 0.3 mg/mL MTT, incubated for 3 hours
Observation period:
cell viability measurement: 3 h
Number of animals:
N/A - In-Vitro assay
Details on study design:
The test substance was applied to EpiSkin™ human epidermis skin constructs. The constructs consisted of normal, human-derived epidermal keratinocytes, which had been cultured to form a multilayered, highly differentiated model of the human epidermis with a functional multilayered stratum corneum. The constructs were treated with the neat test substance for 15 minutes. After rinsing of the test substance the constructs were incubated for 42 hours. The cell viability was determined by mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity, assessed by the reduction of MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) to a soluble, coloured, formazan product. The prediction model uses the percentage viability values (compared tonegative control viability) to identify irritant and non-irritant substances.

This assay was valid with negative and positive controls showing results within the acceptable
range.

Controls
The negative control was sterile Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS) with magnesium and calcium.
The positive control was 5% Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate (SDS) in purified water.
Preparation/application of samples

The test substance, Unjecol 85AN, positive and negative controls were in liquid form and were applied by dispensing a volume of 10 µL over each tissue using a positive displacement pipette.

Results and discussion

In vitro

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Value:
132.5
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Value:
120.2
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Value:
109.2
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation

In vivo

Irritant / corrosive response data:
The test substance elicited a mean tissue viability of 120.6 ± 11.6% and was predicted as non-irritant to the skin.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Results from assay


Sample

Tissue viability as percentage of mean OD negative control


Prediction
MTT endpoint

Replicate Tissues

Mean ±
SD

a

b

c

 

 

 

 

 

 

Negative Control

88.6

95.4

116.1

100.0 ± 14.3

Not applicable

Positive Control

16.0

14.0

14.3

14.7 ± 1.1

Irritant

Unjecol 85AN

132.5

120.2

109.2

120.6 ± 11.6

Non-Irritant

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: OECD GHS
Conclusions:
It was concluded that the test substance, Unjecol 85AN, with a mean tissue viability of 120.6 ± 11.6%, was predicted as non-irritant to the skin.