Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Acute Toxicity: oral

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study without detailed documentation
Remarks:
GLP compliant, guideline study, available as unpublished report, no restrictions, fully adequate for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2001
Report date:
2001

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 420 (Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Method)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Test type:
fixed dose procedure
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1,4:3,6-dianhydro-D-glucitol
EC Number:
211-492-3
EC Name:
1,4:3,6-dianhydro-D-glucitol
Cas Number:
652-67-5
Molecular formula:
C6H10O4
IUPAC Name:
1,4:3,6-dianhydro-D-glucitol

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: IFFA-CREDO, 69592 L’Arbresle, France
- Age at study initiation: 5 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 146.6 – 160.9 g for males, 124.1 – 133.6 g for females
- Fasting period before study: 18 h
- Housing: 2 animals per cage, in Makrolon cages (37.5 x 23.5 x 16 cm), stainless streel grid lid, sawdust bedding
- Diet: ad libitum A04C maintenance diets pellets, UAR – 9130 Villemoisson / Orge – France
- Water: ad libitum potable water, Chateau’eau SA, 59110 La Madeleine, France
- Acclimation period: 7 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21 ± 2
- Humidity (%): 50 ± 10
- Air changes (per hr): >12
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
water
Details on oral exposure:
VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: 200 g/L
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 10 mL/kg bw
Doses:
2 g/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
6
Control animals:
yes
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Animals were carefully observed before and just after dosing, 1 hour and 3 hours after administration. After that animals were observed daily. Animals were weighted on day 0, day 3, day 7, day 10 and day 14.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Other examinations performed: Feed and water consumption
Statistics:
Differences in the clinical observations and the observations at necropsy were analyzed using the chi-square test. Means and standard types were calculated with Excel for the following parameters: body weight, feed and water consumptions. Student t-test was used to compare the body weights between the 2 groups.

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Key result
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
No mortality occured.
Clinical signs:
No test item related clinical signs were observed. Animal behavior of treated animals was considered as normal.
Body weight:
- Male, control group, day 14: 277.1 - 300.6 g
- Male, test group, day 14: 272.6 - 301.3 g
- Female, control group, day 14: 185.0 - 206.0 g
- Female, test group, day 14: 183.2 - 224.4 g
Gross pathology:
No treatment related abnormalities were observed.
Other findings:
- Other observations: feed and water consumption were comparable between test group and control group

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met