Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vitro
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2018
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018
Report date:
2019

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 442D (In Vitro Skin Sensitisation: ARE-Nrf2 Luciferase Test Method)
Version / remarks:
adopted February 2015
Deviations:
not specified
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: DRAFT KEY EVENT BASED TEST GUIDELINES 442D “In Vitro Skin Sensitisation assays addressing the AOP Key Event on: Keratinocyte activation”
Version / remarks:
Revised TG 442D – Draft v. 7 July 2017
Deviations:
not specified
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: OECD. (22. May 2015). PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR ASSESSMENT OF PROPOSED SIMILAR OR MODIFIED IN VITRO SKIN SENSITISATION ARE-NRF2 LUCIFERASE TEST METHODS. ENV/JM/MONO(2015)6.
Version / remarks:
22. May 2015
Deviations:
not specified
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: EU-Method B.60 of the Commission Regulation (EU) No. 2017/735 adopted 14. Feb. 2017: “In Vitro Skin Sensitisation: ARE-Nrf2 Luciferase Test Method”
Version / remarks:
adopted 14. Feb. 2017
Deviations:
not specified
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: ESAC Opinion No. 2016-04 of 24 June 2016: ESAC Opinion on the BASF coordinat-ed Performance Standards based validation of the LuSens test method for skin sensi-tisation testing
Version / remarks:
Opinion No. 2016-04 of 24 June 2016
Deviations:
not specified
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: ASF SE: Protocol LuSens Assay, Last update: 16. May 2014 (reported by Ramirez et al. 2016)
Version / remarks:
Last update: 16. May 2014
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
activation of keratinocytes
Justification for non-LLNA method:
This in vitro study was performed to assess the potential of the test item Essential oil of Star Anise Oil (Illicium verum) obtained from the leaves and fruits by steam distillation to activate the Nrf2 transcription factor by using the genetically modified keratinocyte cell-line “LuSens” (Bauch et al. 2012).

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
(E)-anethole
EC Number:
224-052-0
EC Name:
(E)-anethole
Cas Number:
4180-23-8
Molecular formula:
C10H12O
IUPAC Name:
1-methoxy-4-prop-1-en-1-ylbenzene
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
4-allylanisole
EC Number:
205-427-8
EC Name:
4-allylanisole
Cas Number:
140-67-0
Molecular formula:
C10H12O
IUPAC Name:
1-allyl-4-methoxybenzene
1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Caryophyllene
EC Number:
201-746-1
EC Name:
Caryophyllene
Cas Number:
87-44-5
Molecular formula:
C15H24
IUPAC Name:
4,11,11-trimethyl-8-methylenebicyclo[7.2.0]undec-4-ene
Constituent 3
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2,6-dimethyl-6-(4-methyl-3-pentenyl)bicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene
EC Number:
241-702-9
EC Name:
2,6-dimethyl-6-(4-methyl-3-pentenyl)bicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene
Cas Number:
17699-05-7
Molecular formula:
C15H24
IUPAC Name:
2,6-dimethyl-6-(4-methylpent-3-en-1-yl)bicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene
Test material form:
liquid

In vitro test system

Details on the study design:
-Solvent: dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).
-Negative control: DL-Lactic acid.
-Positive control: EGDMA (Ethylene glycol dimethylacrylate)
-Cell line: LuSens cell line (BASF SE), are stored in liquid nitrogen in the cell bank of LAUS GmbH.
-Cell cultivate condition: In DMEM (9 % FCS (Fetal calf serum) in cell culture flasks at 37 ± 1 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5.0 ± 0.5 % CO2.
-Cell viability measurement: MTT
-Chemicals and Media: Ca2+/Mg2+-Solution for PBS, EDTA Solution (250 g/L), FCS (Fetal Calf Serum) Superior, Lysepuffer Glo Lysis Buffer 1X.
-Test vessels: 96-well plates.


PERFORMANCE OF THE STUDY:
Cytotoxicity Range Finder Test:
Method: measuring the cell viability with MTT.
Exposure time: 48h
Nominal concentrations of the test item: 0.98 µg/mL, 1.95 µg/mL, 3.91 µg/mL, 7.81 µg/mL, 15.63 µg/mL, 31.25 µg/mL, 62.5 µg/mL, 125 µg/mL, 250 µg/mL, 500 µg/mL, 1000 µg/mL, 2000 µg/mL.

Dose Selection for Experiment I and II:
the following 12 nominal concentrations were chosen for experiment I and II:
16.8 µg/mL, 20.2 µg/mL, 24.2 µg/mL, 29.1 µg/mL, 34.9 µg/mL, 41.9 µg/mL, 50.2 µg/mL, 60.3 µg/mL, 72.3 µg/mL, 86.8 µg/mL, 104.2 µg/mL, 125 µg/mL。

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
Experiment I: Induced a clear effect with an induction value of 4.0 fold in comparison to the solvent control.
Experiment II: Induced a clear effect with an induction value of 5.9 fold in comparison to the solvent control.

EGDMA (120 µM) was used as positive control. The viability was above 70 % and a distinct increase in luciferase induction above 2.5 fold in comparison to the solvent control was detected. This luciferase induction is well within the historical data range of the positive control.

In vitro / in chemico

Results
Key result
Value:
1.5
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: luciferase induction ≥ 1.5 fold.
Remarks:
luciferase induction ≥ 1.5 fold.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 1 (skin sensitising) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
Under the experimental conditions of this study, the test item, Essential oil of Star Anise Oil (Illicium verum) obtained from the leaves and fruits by steam distillation, was positive in the LuSens assay and is therefore considered to have the potential to activate the Nrf2 transcription factor (sensitizing potential).
Executive summary:

This in vitro study evaluates the potential of the test itemEssential oil of Star Anise Oil (Illicium verum) obtained from the leaves and fruits by steam distillationtoactivate the Nrf2 transcription factor (sensitizing potential) by using the LuSens cell line. This test is part of a tiered strategy for the evaluation of skin sensitization potential. Thus, data generated with the present Test Guideline should be used to support the discrimination between skin sensitizers and non-sensitizers in the context of an integrated approach to testing and assessment.

The LuSens test is an ARE Reporter Gene Assay that was developed by the BASF SE (Ludwigshafen, Germany) and is based on the OECD 442D Guideline (KeratinoSens Assay).Since July 2017 a reviewed version of the OECD 442D is available, which includes the LuSens test. Therefore this study is performed in accordance to this draft OECD 442D with the title “In Vitro Skin Sensitisation assays addressing the AOP Key Event on: Keratinocyte activation”.

The assay included a cytotoxicity range finder test (CRFT) and two independent experiments (experiment I and II) with a treatment period of 48 h. The CRFT was performed to detect a potential cytotoxic effect of the test item. Based on the results of this test the concentrations for the two experiments were determined.

In the experiments, the highest nominal applied concentration (125 µg/mL) was chosen based on the results obtained in the CRFT. A geometric series (factor 1.2) of eleven dilutions thereof was prepared. Precipitation of the test item was not visible in any of the experiments.

DMSO (final concentration: 1 %) was used as solvent control and medium no. 3 as growth control. Lactic acid (5000 µM) was used as negative control and EGDMA (120 µM) as positive control.

A statistically significant and reproducible dose-dependent increase in luciferase induction1.5 fold in more than two non-cytotoxic consecutive test item concentrations was observed in both experiments.