Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Repeated dose toxicity: dermal

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
sub-chronic toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
May 1965
Reliability:
3 (not reliable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
significant methodological deficiencies
Remarks:
The test substance was used in formulation at low concentration (0.119 and 1.190%) instead of pure recommended by REAch regulation. No information about chemical substance analysis was provided (as batch, purity, stability). Only 10 animals per dose group were used instead of 20 required in Standard method (OECD Guideline 411 method)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1965
Report date:
1965

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline available
Version / remarks:
The test substance was used in formulation at low concentration (0.119 and 1.190%) instead of pure recommended by REAch regulation. No information about chemical substance analysis was provided (as batch, purity, stability). Only 10 animals per dose group were used instead of 20 required in Standard method (OECD Guideline 411 method)
Principles of method if other than guideline:
USP Hydropholic ointment, alone or containing 0.1 or 1% of External D&C Violet No. 2, was applied to shaved intact skin of male albino rabbit (5 animal per dose test group and 10 in control group). Doses were applied daily, 5 days per week, for a total of 65 applications over 91 days interval. Each dose of 0.5g of the appropriate mixture. All animals were observed for signs of skin irritation or systemic toxicity prior to each daily application of the ointment.
GLP compliance:
no
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Sodium 4-[(9,10-dihydro-4-hydroxy-9,10-dioxo-1-anthryl)amino]toluene-3-sulphonate
EC Number:
224-618-7
EC Name:
Sodium 4-[(9,10-dihydro-4-hydroxy-9,10-dioxo-1-anthryl)amino]toluene-3-sulphonate
Cas Number:
4430-18-6
Molecular formula:
C21H15NO6S.Na
IUPAC Name:
sodium 2-[(4-hydroxy-9,10-dioxo-9,10-dihydroanthracen-1-yl)amino]-5-methylbenzenesulfonate
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: Supplied by John H. Breck, Inc, no more details
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: no information
- Purity test date: Not less than 80%

STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: In tubes, no more details

TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
The test item was used in two formulations containing 0.119% and 1.190% of test item.

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
other: Albino
Sex:
male
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: local supplier, no more details
- Females (if applicable) nulliparous and non-pregnant: not applicable
- Age at study initiation: not specified
- Weight at study initiation: 2.8 to 3.61 kg
- Fasting period before study: no information
- Housing:Animals were housed individually, no more details
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Standard laboratory diet (Hales and Hunter PIONEER rabbit pellets Medicated) ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: period of 1-2 weeks

DETAILS OF FOOD AND WATER QUALITY:no information

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 to 22.2 deg Celsius
- Humidity (%): 40-60%
- Air changes (per hr): air conditionned room, no more details
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 9 hours of light and 15 hours of dark on weekdays, 3 hours of light and 21 hours of dark on weekends

IN-LIFE DATES: From: To: No information

Administration / exposure

Type of coverage:
open
Vehicle:
other: Test item in formulation containing : purified water (35%), white petrolatum (25%), stearyl alcohol (25%), Propylene glycol (12%), sodium lauryl sulfate (1%), propylparaben (0.015%), methylparaben (0.025%)
Details on exposure:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: no information
- % coverage: no information
- Type of wrap if used: no wrap used
- Time intervals for shavings or clipplings: the fur was clipped as necessary from time to time during the test period to insure intimate contact of the ointment with the bare skin.

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): no information
- Time after start of exposure: no information

TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5g per animal per day
- Concentration (if solution): 0.119% or 1.190% in formulation
- Constant volume or concentration used: yes constant volume used 0.5g
- For solids, paste formed: yes

VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): in formulation USP Hydrophilic Ointment
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5g of appropriate ointment
- Concentration (if solution): not applicable
- Lot/batch no. (if required): No information
- Purity: no information

USE OF RESTRAINERS FOR PREVENTING INGESTION: No
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
no
Duration of treatment / exposure:
91 Days
Frequency of treatment:
Daily, 5 days per weeks
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Dose / conc.:
0.119 other: % in formulation
Dose / conc.:
1.19 other: % in formulation
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5 males per dose group and 10 animals in control group
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Details on study design:
- Dose selection rationale: no information
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): not specified
- Rationale for selecting satellite groups: no satellite group

Examinations

Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
Animal were weighed initially, at weekly intervals thereafter, and on the day prior to sacrifice. The general physical condition of each animal was noted and recorded daily at the same time that the skin was observed for irritation
Sacrifice and pathology:
Liver and kidney weights were recorded at autopsy for all animals receiving applications of the dye and for 5 control rabbits. No other organs were weighed.
Complete autopsies were performed in treated animals and 5 control animals. Portions of liver, kidney and skin from the treated area were fixed in buffered neutral formalin, sectioned, stained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined microscopally. The tissues were examined from all animals receiving doses of the ointment containing 1% of the dye and from 5 control animals.

Results and discussion

Results of examinations

Clinical signs:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Animals showed signs of nasal and ocular discharges.
Dermal irritation:
not examined
Description (incidence and severity):
Skin of control animal appeared slighty pink while skin of treated animals assumed violet coloration. No skin or edema were evident.
Mortality:
no mortality observed
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
not examined
Food efficiency:
not examined
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not examined
Ophthalmological findings:
not examined
Haematological findings:
not examined
Clinical biochemistry findings:
not examined
Urinalysis findings:
not examined
Behaviour (functional findings):
not examined
Immunological findings:
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
The mean liver weight was significantly lower than control but the absolute organ weights between test and control showed no difference.
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Neuropathological findings:
not examined
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
no effects observed
Other effects:
not examined

Effect levels

Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
0.119 other: % in formulation
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male
Basis for effect level:
body weight and weight gain
clinical signs
dermal irritation
gross pathology
organ weights and organ / body weight ratios

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Under experimental conditions of this study, the registered item External D&C Violet No. 2 showed no adverse effect at 0.119% and 1.190% in formulation. Hence the No Observe Effect Level could be defined as 0.119%.However, this study cannot be used for classification because The test substance was used in formulation at low concentration (0.119 and 1.190%) instead of pure recommended by REACh regulation. No information about chemical substance analysis was provided (as batch, purity, stability). Only 5 animals per dose group were used instead of 20 required in Standard method (OECD Guideline 411 method). The dosing procedure was performed daily only 5 days per week instead of 7 days per week.
Executive summary:

This no-GLP compliant study was performed to assess the potential toxic effect of the test item External D&C Violet no. 2 on albino rabbits dermally exposed during thirteen weeks.

USP Hydropholic ointment, alone or containing 0.1 or 1% of External D&C Violet No. 2, was applied to shaved intact skin of male albino rabbit (5 animal per dose test group and 10 in control group). Doses were applied daily, 5 days per week, for a total of 65 applications over 91 days interval. Each dose of 0.5g of the appropriate mixture. All animals were observed for signs of skin irritation or systemic toxicity prior to each daily application of the ointment.

Under experimental conditions of this study, the registered item External D&C Violet No. 2 showed no adverse effect at 0.119% and 1.190% in formulation. Hence the No Observe Effect Level could be defined as 0.119%.However, this study cannot be used for classification because The test substance was used in formulation at low concentration (0.119 and 1.190%) instead of pure recommended by REACh regulation. No information about chemical substance analysis was provided (as batch, purity, stability). Only 5 animals per dose group were used instead of 20 required in Standard method (OECD Guideline 411 method). The dosing procedure was performed daily only 5 days per week instead of 7 days per week.