Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to microorganisms

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

No data on the toxicity to aquatic microorganisms are available for the test substance Nickel aluminate. However, there are reliable data available for different structurally analogue test substances.

 

The environmental fate pathways and ecotoxicity effects assessments for Ni metal and Ni compounds is based on the observation that adverse effects to aquatic, soil- and sediment-dwelling organisms are a consequence of exposure to the bioavailable Ni-ion, released by the parent compound. The result of this assumption is that the ecotoxicology will be similar for all soluble Ni substances used in the ecotoxicity experiments. Therefore, data from soluble nickel substances are used in the derivation of ecotoxicological and environmental fate endpoints, based on the Ni-ion.

 

Only a few internationally accepted test methods for microorganisms exist, such as the OECD N° 209 (inhibition of respiration of activated sludge) and ISO N° 9509 (inhibition of nitrification). Generally, short-term measurements (in terms of hours) are preferred, generally corresponding with typical retention times in biological STPs. The TGD (EC, 2003) suggests 10 h as preferable test duration. Furthermore, the information available has to be relevant for the processes that are potentially at risk of disruption, e.g. microbial degradation activity in an STP. To assess risks to these processes, microbial endpoints such as respiration and nitrification inhibition are considered to be the most relevant. Testing using a mixed microbial inoculum is considered more relevant than using single-species inoculum. Thus information reported on individual bacterial species like Microtox (with Vibrio fisheri astest organism), Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas fluorescens and even Escherichia coli are therefore considered as less relevant than those from mixed inoculum. It should be noted that, unlike for some other environmental compartments (e.g., water and terrestrial compartment) there are currently no tools available for correcting the PNECmicro-organism for bioavailability. Therefore the effects assessment and risk characterisation for nickel in this compartment are based on non normalized dissolved nickel concentrations. Studies assessing the effects of nickel on ciliated protozoa (preferably T. pyriformis) and respiration/nitrification using bacteria originating from sewage treatment plants were regarded as directly relevant for the derivation of a PNEC STP. The key publication selected for Ni-PNEC STP derivation is Cokgor et al., (2007). No other PNEC relevant studies that investigated the effects of Ni on bacterial populations were identified. However, the other studies in the database not deemed directly relevant supported the relevancy and the conservative nature of an EC50 of 33 mg/L.

 

A 30 min EC50 of 33 mg Ni/L (Cokgor et al 2007) was the only study carried forward for PNEC-STP derivation.