Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From December 21, 1993 to February 02 1994
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study without detailed documentation

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1994
Report date:
1994

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Pentasodium 2-[[8-[[4-chloro-6-[[3-[[2-(sulphonatooxy)ethyl]sulphonyl]phenyl]amino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-1-hydroxy-3,6-disulphonato-2-naphthyl]azo]naphthalene-1,5-disulphonate
EC Number:
278-674-2
EC Name:
Pentasodium 2-[[8-[[4-chloro-6-[[3-[[2-(sulphonatooxy)ethyl]sulphonyl]phenyl]amino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-1-hydroxy-3,6-disulphonato-2-naphthyl]azo]naphthalene-1,5-disulphonate
Cas Number:
77365-64-1
Molecular formula:
C31H19ClN7Na5O19S6
IUPAC Name:
pentasodium 2-[[8-[[4-chloro-6-[[3-[[2-(sulphonatooxy)ethyl]sulphonyl]phenyl]amino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-1-hydroxy-3,6-disulphonato-2-naphthyl]azo]naphthalene-1,5-disulphonate
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Supplier: Velaz Praha
- Weight: 205-200 g (prior the application)
- Helth status: quality certification, checked frormparasite and patogen microrganisms, viruses and fungi
- Housing: plastic cages in polypropilene T3( Velaz Praha), ventilated and bedding with pure light wood shavings
- Selection: 6 animals pro cage by gender
- Identification: by number on cages and on tail
- Diet: Altromin 1320 (Velaz Praha), daily dose of 20 g
- Water: ad libitum, according to SN 757111
- Cleaning: disinfection of cages
- Acclimatization: quarantine
- Acclimatization period: 14 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature : 22 ± 3 °C
- Humidity: 50 ± 15 %
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12Controlling of temperature and humidity automatic

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes
Amount / concentration applied:
0.1 g
Observation period (in vivo):
1 hour, 24, 48, 72 hours
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3
Details on study design:
DOSAGE PREPARATION
By Mettler AE 200
TEST SITE
Conjuntival sac
APPLICATION
Upper and lower eyelids, held for several seconds to prevent the loss of the substance

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 0
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 0
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 1
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 0

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: CLP criteria not met
Conclusions:
Non irritating to the eye
Executive summary:

Method

The substance was tested for irritation to the eye in rabbit, White New Zealand strain, according to OECD 405.

0.1 grams of the substance were applied to one eye and reactions (louding of the cornea surface, iris, conjunctival hyperemia, swelling) were observed for 72 hours.

Clinical signs were also observed and primary irritation score and the degree of ocular irritation were evaluated.

Conclusion

After 72 hours of observation the registering substance was considered non irritant to the eye.