Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-706-1 | CAS number: 124-63-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 997
- Report date:
- 1997
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Methanesulphonyl chloride
- EC Number:
- 204-706-1
- EC Name:
- Methanesulphonyl chloride
- Cas Number:
- 124-63-0
- Molecular formula:
- CH3ClO2S
- IUPAC Name:
- methanesulfonyl chloride
- Details on test material:
- Test article name : Methane sulfonyl chloride
Cas n°: 124-63-0
Origin: Elf Aquitaine Production
Batch no. : 96000478
Purity: 99.85%.
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Histidine reversion
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium, other: strains: TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537, and TA 102
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- checked for appropriate genetic markers (rfa mutation, R factor)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver post-mitochondrial fraction (S-9) assayed for its ability to metabolize ethidium bromide and cyclophosphamide to bacterial mutagens.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Plate incorporation assay: 0, 40, 200, 1000, and 5000 µg per plate, +/- S9 activation
Pre-incubation assay: 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 7500 and 10000 µg/plate, +/-S9 activation - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Solvent: acetone
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: it as been demontrated that MSC is stable in acetone in these test conditions (Gonzalez C (1994). Formation de MMS par reaction du CMS avec le methanol. Testing laboratory: Elf Aquitaine Production, CAT. Report no.: 94.173. Owner company: Arkema France. Report date: 1994-11-08.)
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: With S9: 2-aminoanthracene 5.0 µg/plate (at lest 1 strain). Without S9, TA98, 2-nitrofluorene 5.0 µg/plate; TA100, TA1535, Sodium azide 2.0 µg/plate; TA1537, 9-aminoacridine 50 µg/plate; TA102, glutaraldehyde 25.0 µg/plate .
- Remarks:
- All positive controls were diluted in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) except for sodium azide and glutaraldehyde, which were diluted in water
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- PRELIMINARY TOXICITY ASSAY
The preliminary toxicity assay was used to establish the dose range over which the test article would be assayed: 0, 40, 200, 1000, and 5000 µg per plate, +/- S9 activation in TA100 strain
MUTAGENICITY ASSAY
Methane Sulfonyl Chloride was assayed for mutation in five
histidine-requiring strains (TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA102) of Salmonella typhimurium, both in the absence and in the presence of metabolic activation by an Aroclor
1254-induced rat liver post-mitochondrial fraction (S-9), in two separate experiments.
TEST PROCEDURE
Plate incorporation method:
One half (0.5) milliliter of S9 or Sham mix, 100 µL of tester strain and 0.02 mL of vehicle or test article dilution were added to 2.5 mL of molten selective top agar at 46°C. After vortexing, the mixture was overlaid onto the surface of minimal bottom agar.
Preincubation method:
One-half (0.5) milliliter of S9 or sham mix, 100 µL of tester strain and 0.02 mL of vehicle or test article dilution were added to culture tubes. fter vortexing, these mixtures were incubated with shaking for 60 A minutes at 37°C. Following the preincubation, 2.5 mL of selective top agar was added to each tube and the mixture was vortexed and overlaid onto the surface of minimal bottom agar.
Three plates/dose were used for the test substance and the positive controls, 5 plates for the negative control. - Evaluation criteria:
- - Acceptance criteria
The assay was considered valid if the following criteria were met:
1) the mean negative control counts fell within the normal ranges,
2) the positive control chemicals induced clear increases in revertant numbers confirming discrimination between different strains, and an active S-9 preparation
3) no more than 5 % of the plates were lost through contamination or some other unforeseen event.
- Evaluation criteria
The test article was considered to be mutagenic if:
1) the assay was valid
2) Dunnett's test gave a significant response (p < 0.01), and the data set showed a significant dose-correlation
3) the positive responses were reproducible. - Statistics:
- Dunnett's test
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: strains: TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537, and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- other: >= 7500 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TOXICITY ASSAYS
An initial toxicity range-finder experiment was carried out in strain TA100 only, using final concentrations of Methane Sulfonyl Chloride at 8, 40, 200, 1000 and 5000 µg/plate, plus solvent and positive controls. Following these treatments, and those in Experiment 1 performed using the same dose range, no clear evidence of toxicity was observed.
Following Experiment 2 treatments performed using pre-incubation methodology, a majority of the test doses were affected in some way by toxicity.
During repeat treatments of these strains in the presence of S-9 and using standard plate-incorporation methodology, signs of toxicity were observed with strain TA102 at the two highest treatment concentrations. Experiment 2 treatments in the absence of S-9 also gave rise to signs of toxicity in a majority of the strains at the higher treatment concentrations.
MUTAGENICITY ASSAYS
Methane Sulfonyl Chloride treatments of strain TA1535 both in the absence and in the presence of S-9, resulted in statistically significant and reproducible increases in revertant numbers (when data were analysed at the 1 % level using Dunnett's test), that were considered to be clear evidence of a mutagenic effect.
Methane Sulfonyl Chloride treatments of strain TA100 in the absence and presence of S-9 also gave rise to statistically significant and reproducible increases in revertant numbers. Although the magnitude of these increases was markedly smaller than those observed with strain TA1535, it was considered that these increases in revertant numbers provided further evidence of Methane Sulfonyl Chloride mutagenic activity.
No treatment of strains TA98, TA1537 and TA102 either in the absence or presence of metabolic activation resulted in a reproducible increase in revertant numbers sufficient to be considered as evidence of mutagenic activity.
The mean numbers of revertant colonies on negative control plates all fell within acceptable ranges, and were significantly elevated by positive control treatments. - Remarks on result:
- other: strain/cell type: TA 1535 and TA 100
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
positive
Methane Sulfonyl Chloride did induce mutation in Salmonella typhimurium strain TA1535, and exhibited evidence of weak mutagenic activity in Salmonella typhimurium strain TA100, both in the absence and presence of a rat liver metabolic activation system (S-9), when tested under the conditions
employed for this study, which included treatments at concentrations up to 10000 µg/plate. - Executive summary:
In an test performed according to the OECD guidelines #471 and GLP, which included treatments at concentrations up to 10000 µg/plate, methanesulfonyl chloride (purity 99.8%) was assayed for mutation in five histidine-requiring strains (TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA102) of Salmonella typhimurium, both in the absence and in the presence of metabolic activation by an Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver post-mitochondrial fraction (S-9).
Methanesulfonyl chloride induced mutagenic activity on TA 1535 and exhibited evidence of weak mutagenic activity in TA 100 strains, both with and without metabolic activation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.