Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Effects on fertility

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
toxicity to reproduction
Remarks:
other: subacute study
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: OECD TG 412
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male/female
Route of administration:
inhalation: aerosol
Type of inhalation exposure (if applicable):
nose only
Vehicle:
other: dry conditioned air
Details on mating procedure:
not applicable because it is a subacute study
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
yes
Duration of treatment / exposure:
28 days
Frequency of treatment:
6 hours per day
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
0, 0.47, 3.9, 34.9 mg/m³
Basis:
other: gravimetric concentrations
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
other: yes: dry conditioned air
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect level:
34.9 mg/m³ air (analytical)
Based on:
act. ingr.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: adverse effects on reproductive organs or tissues
Reproductive effects observed:
not specified
Conclusions:
No adverse effects on reproductive organs or tissues were observed in a subacute inhalation study with rats at 34.9 mg/m³.
Effect on fertility: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
NOAEC
34.9 mg/m³
Study duration:
subacute
Species:
rat
Quality of whole database:
Based on the subacute inhalation study, there is no indication of a reproductive toxicity potential.
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Additional information

In a subacute inhalation toxicity study (OECD TG 412) male/female Wistar rats per dose group were nose-only exposed for 4 weeks (6 hours /day, 5 days/week) to the aerosolized substance. The mean actual concentrations (gravimetric) were 0.47, 3.9 and 34.9 mg Triphenylmethane-4,4',4''-triisocyanate/m³. No adverse effects on reproductive organs or tissues were observed at 34.9 mg/m³.

Effects on developmental toxicity

Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Quality of whole database:
Neither a developmental study (OECD TG 414) nor a testing proposal for such a study are available. Data waiver is claimed.
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Additional information

The toxicological database for inhaled Triphenylmethane-4,4',4''-triisocyanate demonstrates consistently that toxicity is associated only with the portal of entry (respiratory tract). Acute and subacute inhalation studies with Triphenylmethane-4,4',4''-triisocyanate show toxicity confined to the respiratory tract. In general, the toxicological effects observed resulting from inhalation exposure of Triphenylmethane-4,4',4''-triisocyanate, reveal a pattern characteristic for local irritation and its sequelae with lack of systemic toxicity. This mode of action is in line with other diisocyanates and wholly consistent with the chemical reactivity of the isocyanate functional group. Developmental toxicity studies with other diisocyanates (MDI, TDI and HDI) have shown no evidence of any diisocyanate being a developmental toxicant. Mild effects on the foetuses seen with high level exposures to these diisocyanates are considered secondary to the toxicity to the respiratory system of the exposed dams. Therefore, it is proposed that, based on the similar major mode of action as port of entry toxicant, the lack of developmental toxicity seen with MDI, TDI and HDI applies equally to Triphenylmethane-4,4',4''-triisocyanate (many-to-one read-across). Therefore, based on read across there is no indication of a developmental toxicity potential. Protection against respiratory tract toxicity will protect against any secondary effects. In addition, the need to adopt risk management measures to protect against the sensitising potential of these chemicals provides enhanced safeguards. Taking all these points into account (weight of evidence), it is concluded that developmental toxicity is not an endpoint of concern for Triphenylmethane-4,4',4''-triisocyanate.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Additional information