Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 426-400-9 | CAS number: 170222-39-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From April 22 to July 18, 1998
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 998
- Report date:
- 1998
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1996
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.12 (Mutagenicity - In Vivo Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1992
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Red RA 10463
- IUPAC Name:
- Red RA 10463
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- NMRI
- Sex:
- male/female
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- Corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- Repeat administration of 10 ml/kg bw test item in corn oil via intraperitoneal injection with 24 hour interval
- Frequency of treatment:
- Two administrations, 24 hours apart; two sampling times of 24 and 48 hours per dose
- Post exposure period:
- For each concentration (high, medium, low) and for the solvent control, a post exposure period of 24 or 48 hours was used.
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 250 mg/kg bw (total dose)
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw (total dose)
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw (total dose)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 males and 5 females per group; two groups per dose (sampled at (a) 24 hours or (b) 48 hours)
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- - Reference substance: cyclophosphamide dissolved in 0.9 % (w/v) NaCl in Milli-RO water
- Administration: 50 mg salt/kg bw as a single 10 ml/kg bw intraperitoneal injection
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Erythrocytes from the femoral bone marrow
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- Both femurs of each animal were removed and freed of blood and muscles. Both ends of the bone were shortened until a small opening to the marrow canal became visible. The bone was f'lushed with approximately 2 ml of foetal calf serum. The cell suspension was collected and centrifuged at 1000 rpm (approximately 100 g) for 5 min.
The supernatant was removed with a Pasteur pipette. A drop of serum was on the pellet. The cells in the sediment were carefully mixed with the serum by aspiration with the remaining serum. A drop of the cell suspension was placed on the end of a slide which was previously cleaned (24 h immersed in a 1:1 mixture of 96 % (v/v) ethanol/ether and cleaned with a tissue) and marked (with the NOTOX study identification number and the animal number). The drop was spread by moving a clean slide with round-whetted slides at an angle of approximately 45° over the slide with the drop of bone marrow suspension. The preparations were airdried, fixed for 5 minutes in 100 % methanol and air-dried overnight. Two slides were prepared per animal (one for each femur).
The slides were automatically stained using the "Wright-stain-procedure" in an 'Ames' HEMA-tek slide stainer (Miles, Bayer Nederland B.V.). The dry slides were dipped in xylene before they were embedded in MicroMount and mounted with a coverslip.
All slides were randomly coded before examination. An adhesive label with N0T0X study identif ication number and code was stuck over the marked slide. At first the slides were screened at a magnification of 100 × for regions of suitable technical quality, i.e. where the cells were well spread, undamaged and well stained. Slides were scored at a magnification of 1000 ×. The number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes was counted in 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes. The ratio polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes was determined by counting and differentiating the first 1000 erythrocytes at the same time. Micronuclei were only counted in polychromatic erythrocytes. Averages and standard deviations were calculated. - Evaluation criteria:
- a) The positive control substance induces a statistically significant increase in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes.
b) The incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in the control animals should reasonably be within the laboratory historical control data range.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- At the 24 hours sampling time, the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes per 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes in the male animals treated with 500 mg/kg body weight and at the 48 hours sampling time in the female animals treated with 500 mg/kg body weight was statistically significantly (P=0.05) increased. Since, no increase in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes was observed in the polychromatic erythrocytes of the bone marrow of all other test substance treated groups, the increases just statistically were significant (P=0.05) and moreover the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes per 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes were within historical control data range, therefore, these increases were not considered biologically relevant.
The animals of the treated groups showed no decrease in the ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes compared to the vehicle controls, which reflects a lack of toxic effects of the test item on the erythropoiesis.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Not mutagenic in the micronucleus test under the described experimental conditions.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
