Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 426-400-9 | CAS number: 170222-39-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- From March 31 to July 14, 1999
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 999
- Report date:
- 1999
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosomal Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1992
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
- Version / remarks:
- Guidelines stipulated by the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare and the Japanese Ministry of lnternational Trade and lndustry.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Red RA 10463
- IUPAC Name:
- Red RA 10463
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: cultured peripheral human
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Rat liver microsomal enzymes were routinely prepared from adult male Wistar rats from Charles River, Sulzfeld, Germany, and housed at the testing facility under standard laboratory conditions. Rats were injected intraperitoneally with 20 % w/v Aroclor 1254 (500 mg/kg bw) in corn oil then sacrificed by decapitation 5 days later. Rat livers were removed and washed in cold (0 °C), sterile 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.1 mM Na2-EDTA. Livers were then blended and homogenised in 3 volumes of phosphate buffer with a Potter homogeniser. The homogenate was centrifuged for 15 min at 9000 g. The supernatant (S9) was transferred into sterile ampules, which were stored in liquid nitrogen (-196 °C).
PREPARATION:
Prepared immediately before use and kept on ice. S9-mix contained per ml: 1.63 mg MgCl2.6H2O 2.46 mg KCI; 1.7 mg glucose-6-phosphate; 3.4 mg NADP; 4 µmol HEPES. The above solution was filter (0.22 µm)-sterilised. To 0.5 ml S9-mix components, 0.5 ml S9-fraction was added (50 % (v/v) S9 fraction).
Metabolic activation was achieved by adding 0.2 ml S9-mix to 5.3 ml exposition medium (4.8 ml F10 complete culture medium, 0.4 ml blood and 0.1 ml (9 mg/ml) phytohaemagglutinin). The concentration of the S9-fraction in the exposition medium was 1.8 % (v/v). - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- - Test concentrations: 0, 1, 3 and 10 µg/ml
- Justification: based on a dose range finding test (0.11, 0.33, 1.1, 3.3 and 1.1 µg/ml, both with and without S9-mix), precipitation is observed at 10 µg/ml - Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO (0.9 % v/v final concentration)
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- mitomycin C
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- - BLOOD SAMPLES: taken from healthy adult male volunteers by venapuncture and stored at between 4 and 25 °C. Within 4 h, lymphocyte cultures were started.
- F10 COMPLETE CULTURE MEDIUM: consisted of Ham's F10 medium without thymidine and hypoxanthine (Gibco), supplemented with 20 % (v/v) heat-inactivated (56 °C; 30 min) foetal calf serum (Gibco), L-glutamine (2 mM), penicillin/streptomycin (50 U/ml and 50 µg/ml respectively), sodium bicarbonate (1.2 g/l) and 30 U/ml heparin.
- CELL CULTURE CONDITIONS: whole blood was cultured in F10 complete culture medium with Phytohaemagglutinin (Murex). In the absence of S9-mix 5 mL F10 complete culture medium and in the presence of S9-mix 4.8 ml F10 complete culture medium and 0.4 ml whole blood, 0.1 ml per culture (9 mg/ml) phytohaemagglutinin was added.
- ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS: all incubations were carried out in a humid atmosphere (80-100 %) containing 5 % CO2 in air in the dark at 37 °C. The temperature, humidity and %-CO2 were monitored.
- EXPERIMENTS: two experiments were performed. In both, lymphocyte cultures were cultured for 48 h and thereafter exposed in duplicate to selected test item doses (0.4 ml blood of a healthy male donor added to 5 ml or 4.8 mL culture medium, without and with metabolic activation respectively and 0.1 ml (9 mg/ml) phytohaemagglutinin).
In Experiment I, after 3 hours, cells were washed with 5 ml of HBSS and incubated in 5 ml culture medium for another 20-22 h (24 h fixation time). Based on the mitotic index of the dose range finding test and the first cytogenetic assay, appropriate dose levels were selected for the second cytogenetic assay.
The independent repeat was performed with the following modifications of experimental conditions. In Experiment II, after 3 h treatment, cells in the presence of S9-mix were rinsed once wlth 5 ml of HBSS and incubated in 5 ml culture medium for another 44-46 h (48 h fixation time). The cells which were treated for 24 h and 48 h in the absence of S9-mix were not rinsed after treatment but were worked up immediately after 24 h and 48 h (24 h and 48 h fixation time).
- CHROMOSOME PREPARATION: during the last 3 h of the culture period, cell division was arrested by addition of the spindle inhibitor colchicine (0.5 µg/ml medium). Thereafter the cell cultures were centrifuged for 5 min at 1300 rpm (150 g) and the supernatant was removed. Cells in the remaining cellpellet were
swollen by a 5 min treatment with hypotonic 0.56 % (w/v) potassium chloride solution at 37 °C. After hypotonic treatment, cells were fixed with 3 changes of methanol: acetic acid fixative (3:1 v/v). - Rationale for test conditions:
- Recommended test system
- Evaluation criteria:
- ACCEPTABILITY OF ASSAY
a) The number of chromosome aberrations found in the solvent control cultures should be reasonably within the laboratory historical control data range of 0 to 9 (mean = 0.9; standard deviation = 1.0) aberrant cells per 100 metaphases in the absence of S9-mix, gaps excluded and 0 to 5 (mean = 0.7; standard deviation = 0.9) aberrant cells per 100 metaphases in the presence of S9-mix; gaps excluded).
b) The positive control substances should produce slatistically significant (Chi-square test, P < 0.05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations.
c) A homogeneous response between the replicate cultures is observed.
DATA EVALUATION AND STATISTICAL PROCEDURES
Positive if:
a) induces a dose-related statistically significant (Chi-square test, P < 0.05) increase in number of cells with chromosome aberrations.
b) a statistically significant increase in frequencies of the number of cells with chromosome aberrations is observed in the absence of a clear dose-response relationship.
Negative (not clastogenic) if:
- None of the tested concentrations induced a statistically significant (Chi-square test, P < 0.05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: cultured peripheral human
- Remarks:
- exp. I
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: cultured peripheral human
- Remarks:
- exp. II
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- - Dose range finding study: test item precipitated at top nominal dose of 10 µg/mL, both with and without metabolic activation.
- Experiment I, with and without S9 mix, 3 h treatment time, 24 h fixation time: no statistically or biologically significant increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations.
- Experiment II, without S9 mix, 24 h treatment time, 24 h fixation time: no statistically or biologically significant increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations.
- Experiment II, without S9 mix, 48 h treatment time, 48 h fixation time: induced a statistically significant increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations, when gaps were included only, at the highest tested precipitating concentration of 10 µg/mL only. Since the types of aberrations observed were mainly breaks and gaps, the increase is not dose-related and moreover the number of cells with chromosome aberrations was within the historical solvent control data range, the increase is not considered biologically relevant.
- Experiment II, with S9 mix, 3 h treatment time, 48 h fixation time: no statistically or biologically significant increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Test substance is not considered clastogenic as it did not induce chromosome aberrations in cultured peripheral human lymphocytes up to 10 µg/ml with and without metabolic activation under the described experimental conditions.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
