Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Remarks:
other: Using SkinEthic
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2011

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 492 (Reconstructed Human Cornea-like Epithelium (RhCE) Test Method for Identifying Chemicals Not Requiring Classification and Labelling for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
Version / remarks:
The guideline is not cited, but its methodology is followed.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
SkinEthic exposed to subject material for 10 minutes. Viability of cells determined by their ability to reduce MTT.
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,5,5,5-undecafluoro-4-(trifluoromethyl)pentane
EC Number:
206-575-6
EC Name:
1,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,5,5,5-undecafluoro-4-(trifluoromethyl)pentane
Cas Number:
355-04-4
Molecular formula:
C6F14
IUPAC Name:
1,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,5,5,5-undecafluoro-4-(trifluoromethyl)pentane

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Irritation parameter:
other: Relative mean viability
Value:
ca. 93.3
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: OECD GHS
Conclusions:
Material is not irritating.
Executive summary:

Material is not irritating.