Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 477-690-9 | CAS number: 874819-71-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Long-term toxicity to fish
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- fish early-life stage toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 25/04/2022 - 19/10/2022
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 210 (Fish, Early-Life Stage Toxicity Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Test item name: N-(2-Nitrophenyl)-phosphoric triamide (2-NPT)
Substance name: N-(2-Nitrophenyl)-phosphoric triamide
CAS number: 874819-71-3
EC number: 447-690-9
Chemical formula: C6H9N4O3P
Molecular mass: 216.1 g/mol
Batch number: 210402
Purity: 99.6% - Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- Samples of selected stock and test solutions were taken to determine the actual test item concentrations in comparison to the nominally applied concentrations. Duplicate samples were kept separately as a reserve. Each sample was analysed independently.
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- Stock solutions (S1) of the test item in modified reconstituted water were prepared by weighing 2.50054–2.75041 g of the test item into 5 L of dilution medium, resulting in nominal concentrations of 500–550 mg test item/L (April 26, 2022 to May 25, 2022). This solution (5 L) was intensively stirred on a magnetic stirrer at 1100 rpm at room temperature for 15 minutes interrupted by treating the solution in an ultrasonic bath (in total approx. 2 minute) to ensure a homogeneous distribution of the test item in the test medium.Thereafter the stock solution (S1), containing the pre-dissolved test item, was combined with the total amount of test medium used to prepare the final stock solution (S2). Therefore, the stock solution (S1) was transferred in a stainless-steel tank. The measuring flask containing the stock solution S1 was rinsed once with modified reconstituted water, filled with test medium up to calibration mark, and added to the storage tank of the final stock solution (S2). The remaining amount of modified reconstituted water was added to the stock solution tank by using a 10 L measuring flask ether prior to or directly after addition of the stock solution (S1) and the rinsing solutions, so that in total 100–110 L of modified reconstituted water was provided in the stainless-steel tank.
This final stock solution was stirred for 1–2 minutes at ambient temperature in the dark using a stainless-steel propeller stirrer.
The test solutions were prepared by a flow-through device. The stock solution S2 and the dilution medium (test medium) were delivered by the flow-through system to mixing vessels. The final test solutions were delivered directly from the mixing vessels to the designated test vessels using Teflon tubing and a multi-channel peristaltic pump assembled with Tygone® tubes, set to deliver the desired volume. During dosing into the flow-through system (between renewals), the control and the stock solution were stored at room temperature in the dark. During storage, the tanks were closed with a lid to reduce air-exchange and evaporation.
The flow rates (volume delivered per stroke) were measured volumetrically at least three times per week. The volume delivered/measured was divided by the number of strokes. The variation of the nominal stroke-volume was calculated by dividing the measured flow [mL/stroke] by the nominal volume per stroke of the designated pump expressed in percentage of nominal values.
The actual measured flow rates for all treatments were within ±10% of the mean flow rates during the exposure period, except for the treatment level C1 (1.00 mg/L) and C2 (1.77 mg/L) the flow rate was slightly higher at 2 measuring intervals with a maximum of 5.51-times turn-over rate.The test vessels containing 800 mL of the test solution were placed into a temperature-controlled water bath at test temperature for temperature adaptation prior to test start. - Test organisms (species):
- Danio rerio (previous name: Brachydanio rerio)
- Details on test organisms:
- Species: Danio rerio Hamilton-Buchanan 1822 (Zebrafish).
Origin: Fertilised eggs were collected from adult zebrafish from in-house cultures, which have been maintained and bred at ECT since Jan/May 2021.
Holding conditions and fertilisation of test organisms: In the culture tanks, the fish were kept in reconstituted water diluted with deionised water (1:1; v/v) and supplemented with 1% of artificial seawater (Tropic Marin, Dr. Biener GmbH Aquarientechnik, Wartenberg, Germany; salinity 28 ± 2‰). Fish were held in glass aquaria at 26 ± 2 °C with a 16 h/8 h photoperiod. They were fed a combined diet of newly hatched nauplii of Artemia sp. (Sanders Brine Shrimp Co., Morgan, UT 84050, U.S.A.) and TetraMin (Tetra Werke, Melle, Germany). - Test type:
- flow-through
- Water media type:
- other: Modified reconstituted water
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 35 d
- Hardness:
- 164-179 mg CaCO3/L
- Test temperature:
- 25.5 - 26.9 °C
- pH:
- 7.2 - 7.9
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 5.6 - 8.7
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal: 1.00, 1.77, 3.16, 5.62 and 10.0 mg test item/L plus a control
The measured concentration of the test item within the test solutions (treatment levels) showed stable concentration throughout the exposure period and no significant decline of the test item concentration compared to the time of the exposure period. The recoveries calculated based on the nominal concentrations in mg test item/L ranged between 71.5% and 106.9%, except in one sample of the highest treatment level (C5) with a recovery of 52.7%; this sample was excluded from further evaluation, see explanation below table above. Since, some recoveries were determined to be below 80% of nominal it was decided to calculate the mean measured concentration for each treatment level.
To calculate the mean measured concentrations of N-(2-Nitrophenyl)-phosphoric triamide (2-NPT) at each treatment level, the geometric mean concentration of each concentration level C1 to C5 (1.00 to 10.0 mg test item/L) was calculated. The resulting mean measured concentrations were 0.869, 1.54, 2.79, 5.41 and 9.42 mg test item/L for C1 to C5, respectively, equivalent to mean recoveries of 86.9, 87.0, 88.3, 96.3 and 94.2% for C1 to C5, respectively.
The biological data were reported based on nominal test item concentrations in mg test item/L, and based on mean measured test item concentrations in mg test item/L. - Key result
- Duration:
- 35 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- > 9.42 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- weight
- Key result
- Duration:
- 35 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 9.42 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- weight
- Key result
- Duration:
- 35 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- > 9.42 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: Number of healthy fish
- Key result
- Duration:
- 35 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 9.42 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: Number of healthy fish
- Key result
- Duration:
- 35 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- > 9.42 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Key result
- Duration:
- 35 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 9.42 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Key result
- Duration:
- 35 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- > 9.42 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: Hatching success
- Key result
- Duration:
- 35 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 9.42 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: Hatching success
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- An Early-life Stage Toxicity Test (Semi-Static System) of BDP to Zebra-fish was conducted in accordance with OECD test guideline 210 with GLP compliance. The study was conducted under flow-through conditions with the nominal concentration of 1.00, 1.77, 3.16, 5.62 and 10.0 mg test item/L and control for a period of 35 days after post-hatch. The mortality/survival at embryo, larval and juvenile stages were observed and recorded once a day during exposure. At the end of the exposure, the total dry and wet weight of all surviving fish was determined and the length of surviving fish was measured. Compared with control group, the NOEC for the parameters hatching success, post-hatch success (Survival), number of healthy fish, length of the surviving fish, wet weight of the surviving fish and dry weight of surviving fish was estimated to be greater than 10 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
An Early-life Stage Toxicity Test (Semi-Static System) of BDP to Zebra-fish was conducted in accordance with OECD test guideline 210 with GLP compliance. The study was conducted under flow-through conditions with the nominal concentration of 1.00, 1.77, 3.16, 5.62 and 10.0 mg test item/L and control for a period of 35 days after post-hatch. The mortality/survival at embryo, larval and juvenile stages were observed and recorded once a day during exposure. At the end of the exposure, the total dry and wet weight of all surviving fish was determined and the length of surviving fish was measured.
Under the experimental conditions of this study, no concentration-response relationship was observed for the parameter hatching success, post-hatch success (survival), length and wet weight of the surviving fish. The biological endpoints (NOEC/LOEC, EC50) were reported based on nominal concentrations in the test solutions given in mg test item/L.
Endpoints (nominal)
[mg test item/L]
Parameter
EC50
NOEC
LOEC
Hatching success
n.d.
≥10.0
>10.0
Post-hatch success (Survival)
n.d.
≥10.0
>10.0
Number of healthy fish1
n.d.
≥10.0
>10.0
Length of the surviving fish
n.d.
≥10.0
>10.0
Wet weight of the surviving fish
n.d.
≥10.0
>10.0
Dry weight of surviving fish
n.d.
≥10.0
>10.0
Analytical Findings
To determine the actual test item concentrations, samples were taken from the stock and test solutions for analytical measurement. Samples were measured in test solutions at regular intervals throughout the exposure period.
The measured concentration of the test item within the test solutions (treatment levels) showed stable concentration throughout the exposure period and no significant decline of the test item concentration compared to the time of the exposure period. The recoveries calculated based on the nominal concentrations in mg test item/L ranged between 71.5% and 106.9%, except in one sample of the highest treatment level (C5) with a recovery of 52.%. Since, some recoveries were determined to be below 80% of nominal it was decided to calculate the mean measured concentration for each treatment level.
To calculate the mean measured concentrations of N-(2-Nitrophenyl)-phosphoric triamide (2-NPT) at each treatment level, the geometric mean concentration of each concentration level C1 to C5 (1.00 to 10.0 mg test item/L) was calculated. The resulting mean measured concentrations were 0.869, 1.54, 2.79, 5.41 and 9.42 mg test item/L for C1 to C5, respectively, equivalent to mean recoveries of 86.9, 87.0, 88.3, 96.3 and 94.2% for C1 to C5, respectively.
Reference
Hatching Success
Nominal concentration [mg test item/L] | Introduced eggs [n] | Hatched fish [n] | Unhatched fish [n] | Hatching success |
0 (Control) | 80 | 79 | 1 | 98.8 |
1.00 (C1) | 80 | 79 | 1 | 98.8 |
1.77 (C2) | 80 | 78 | 2 | 97.5 |
3.16 (C3) | 80 | 77 | 3 | 96.3 |
5.62 (C4) | 80 | 78 | 2 | 97.5 |
10.0 (C5) | 80 | 75 | 5 | 93.8 |
Post-Hatch Success (Survival) of the Fish
Nominal concentration [mg test item/L] | Hatched fish larvae [n] | Surviving fish larvae [n] | Dead fish larvae [n] | Post-hatch mortality [% of hatched eggs] | Post-hatch success (survival) [% of hatched eggs] |
0 (Control) | 79 | 69 | 10 | 12.7 | 87.3 |
1.00 (C1) | 79 | 72 | 7 | 8.9 | 91.1 |
1.77 (C2) | 78 | 74 | 4 | 5.1 | 94.9 |
3.16 (C3) | 77 | 69 | 8 | 10.4 | 89.6 |
5.62 (C4) | 78 | 72 | 6 | 7.7 | 92.3 |
10.0 (C5) | 75 | 69 | 6 | 8.0 | 92.0 |
Wet Weight of the Surviving Fish at Test End
Nominal concentration [mg test item/L] | Mean [mg] | Standard deviation [mg] | Difference compared to control [%] |
0 (Control) | 40.065 | 2.9683 | – |
1.00 (C1) | 36.035 | 2.3599 | 10.1 |
1.77 (C2) | 38.985 | 2.0642 | 2.7 |
3.16 (C3) | 38.295 | 2.2744 | 4.4 |
5.62 (C4) | 37.530 | 2.4388 | 6.3 |
10.0 (C5) | 39.712 | 2.7009 | 0.9 |
Dry Weight of the Surviving Fish at Test End
Nominal concentration [mg test item/L] | Mean [mg] | Standard deviation [mg] | Difference compared to control [%] |
0 (Control) | 11.13 | 0.865 | – |
1.00 (C1) | 10.01 | 0.847 | 10.1 |
1.77 (C2) | 10.82 | 0.690 | 2.8 |
3.16 (C3) | 10.70 | 0.840 | 3.9 |
5.62 (C4) | 10.12 | 0.511 | 9.1 |
10.0 (C5) | 10.90 | 1.000 | 2.1 |
Length of the Fish at Test End
Nominal concentration [mg test item/L] | Mean [mm] | Standard deviation [mm] | Reduction compared to control [%] |
0 (Control) | 17.36 | 0.362 | – |
1.00 (C1) | 16.91 | 0.289 | 2.6 |
1.77 (C2) | 17.25 | 0.317 | 0.6 |
3.16 (C3) | 17.23 | 0.399 | 0.7 |
5.62 (C4) | 17.02 | 0.452 | 1.9 |
10.0 (C5) | 17.31 | 0.363 | 0.3 |
Summary of Biological Results
Nominal concentration [mg test item/L] | Introduced eggs | Hatched fish | Survived fish | Deformed fish/ different behaviour | Healthy fish | Wet weight of fish | Dry weight of fish | Length of fish |
0 (Control) | 80 | 79 | 69 | 0 | 69 | 40.07 | 11.13 | 17.36 |
1.00 (C1) | 80 | 79 | 72 | 0 | 72 | 36.04 | 10.01 | 16.91 |
1.77 (C2) | 80 | 78 | 74 | 0 | 74 | 38.99 | 10.82 | 17.25 |
3.16 (C3) | 80 | 77 | 69 | 0 | 69 | 38.30 | 10.70 | 17.23 |
5.62 (C4) | 80 | 78 | 72 | 0 | 72 | 37.53 | 10.12 | 17.02 |
10.0 (C5) | 80 | 75 | 69 | 0 | 69 | 39.71 | 10.90 | 17.31 |
Description of key information
An Early-life Stage Toxicity Test (Semi-Static System) of BDP to Zebra-fish was conducted in accordance with OECD test guideline 210 with GLP compliance. The study was conducted under flow-through conditions with the nominal concentration of 1.00, 1.77, 3.16, 5.62 and 10.0 mg test item/L and control for a period of 35 days after post-hatch. The mortality/survival at embryo, larval and juvenile stages were observed and recorded once a day during exposure. At the end of the exposure, the total dry and wet weight of all surviving fish was determined and the length of surviving fish was measured. Compared with control group, the NOEC for the parameters hatching success, post-hatch success (Survival), number of healthy fish, length of the surviving fish, wet weight of the surviving fish and dry weight of surviving fish was estimated to be greater than 10 mg/L.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water fish
Fresh water fish
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect concentration:
- >= 10 mg/L
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
