Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Single oral application of the test item to rats yielded LD50 > 5000 mg/kg bw. 
Single inhalation exposure against the test item for 4 hours yielded LC50 > 5000 mg/m³

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: reporting in brief but relevant information is available
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Single oral application by gavage of 5000 mg/kg bw dissolved in lutrol to 10 male Wistar rats; observation time: 14 days
GLP compliance:
not specified
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
yes
Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 160-180 g
- Housing: 5 /cage
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
other: lutrol
Details on oral exposure:
single oral application by gavage
Doses:
5000 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
10
Control animals:
not specified
Details on study design:
Single oral application by gavage of 5000 mg/kg bw dissolved in lutrol to 10 male Wistar rats; observation time: 14 days LD 50 calcuation according to Fink and Hund Arneim.-forsch. 15, 624 (1965)
Statistics:
no further data
Sex:
male
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 5 000 mg/kg bw
Remarks on result:
other: no mortality no clinical findings
Mortality:
0/10
Clinical signs:
other: no clinical findings
Gross pathology:
not examined
Other findings:
no further data
Executive summary:

Single oral application by gavage of 5000 mg/kg bw to 10 male rats caused no death and no clinical findings were observed during the 14 day-observation period. Thus, the LD50 was considered to be >5000 mg/kg bw (Loeser 1976)

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
discriminating dose
Value:
5 000 mg/kg bw
Quality of whole database:
The only available reliable study on rats

Acute toxicity: via inhalation route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: inhalation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: according to OECD TG and GLP
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 403 (Acute Inhalation Toxicity)
GLP compliance:
yes
Test type:
standard acute method
Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 2 month
- Weight at study initiation: 180-200 g
- Fasting period before study:
- Housing: before test : singly and during test in groups
- Diet ad libitum
- Water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22
- Humidity (%): 40-60
- Air changes (per hr): 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Route of administration:
inhalation
Type of inhalation exposure:
nose only
Vehicle:
clean air
Details on inhalation exposure:
generation and characterization of chamber atmosphere - mean vaöues
target concentration 5000 mg/m³
gravimetric concentration 5064 mg/m³
inlet air flow 28 l/min (concurrent control : air. 15 l/min)
exhaust air flow: 23.8 l/min (concurrent control: 12.8 l/min)
mean temperature 23.0°C (concurrent control: 23.7°C
mean rel humidity 8.4 % (concurrent control: 5 %)
Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter(MMAD) 4.10 µm
Aerosol Mass < 3 µm: 38 %
Analytical verification of test atmosphere concentrations:
yes
Duration of exposure:
ca. 4 h
Concentrations:
0 or 5000 µg/m³
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5 rats /sex and concentration
Control animals:
yes
Details on study design:
according to the respective guideline , 2 weeks pot exposure observation
To identify exposure related effects, comparisons with an appropriate vehicle control were performed. This control was exposed to an atmosphere using essentially similar exposure conditions as were used for the test substance.
body weight determination on dayys 1,3,7 and weekly thereafter
deaths were recorded
cöonical signs andappearannnce and behavior of each rat were recordedNecropsy was performed
andgross pathological changes were notet (if available)
Statistics:
yes
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect level:
> 5 064 mg/m³ air (analytical)
Exp. duration:
4 h
Mortality:
no rat died
Clinical signs:
other: no specific clinical signs were observed
Body weight:
Comparisons between the control and the exposure group revealed transient changes in body weights of no toxicological significance
Gross pathology:
-Animals sacrificed at the end of the observation period:
The macroscopic findings of extrapulmonary organs were essentially indistinguishable amongst expossusre and control groups.
The focal discoloration observed in 2 of 6 rats of the test groups are not considered to be pathodiagnostic of any adverse effects of the lung.
Other findings:
no further data
Executive summary:

A study on acute inhalation toxicity of N,N'-dimethyldiphenylthiuram disulfide on rats has been conducted in accordance with OECD TG 403. A group of male and female rats was nose-only exposed to the dry powder aerosol of the test article at an actual concentration of 5064 mg/m³ The respirability of the aerosol was adequate to achieve the objective of the study, i.e. the average mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) was 4.1 µm. The animals were obsreved post exposure for 14 days. Mortality did not occur. Apart from a minimal and transient decrease in body weights, which was considered to be of no toxicological significance, the exposure was tolerated without any pathodiagnostic effects suggestive of portal entry or systemic toxicity. The results can be summarized as follows: LC50 (rat) >5064 mg/m³ (Pauluhn 2012)

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
discriminating conc.
Value:
5 064 mg/m³ air
Quality of whole database:
The only available study is performed according to OECD Guidline and GLP and has Klimisch Score 1

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

oral exposure

Single oral application by gavage of 5000 mg/kg bw to 10 male rats caused no death and no clinical findings were observed during the 14 day-observation period. Thus, the LD50 was considered to be >5000 mg/kg bw (Loeser 1976)

inhalation exposure

A study on acute inhalation toxicity of N,N'-dimethyldiphenylthiuram disulfide on rats has been conducted in accordance with OECD TG 403. A group of male and female rats was nose-only exposed for 4 hours to the dry powder aerosol of the test article at an actual concentration of 5064 mg/m³ .The respirability of the aerosol was adequate to achieve the objective of the study, i.e. the average mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) was 4.1 µm. The animals were observed post exposure for 14 days. Mortality did not occur. Apart from a minimal and transient decrease in body weights, which was considered to be of no toxicological significance, the exposure was tolerated without any pathodiagnostic effects suggestive of portal entry or systemic toxicity.

Thus, the results can be summarized as follows: LC50 (rat) >5064 mg/m³/4h (Pauluhn 2012)

dermal exposure

According to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACh) ANNEX VIII column 2, in addition to the acute toxicty using the oral route , for substances other than gases, at least the acute toxicity data for one other route should be provided. This recommendation is fulfilled because there is an acute inhalation study available which was performed according to the respective guideline and GLP. Thus, there is no need to conduct an acute toxicity study using the dermal route..


Justification for selection of acute toxicity – oral endpoint
The only available reliable study on rats

Justification for selection of acute toxicity – inhalation endpoint
guideline study and GLP

Justification for selection of acute toxicity – dermal endpoint
According to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACh) ANNEX VIII column 2, in addition to the acute toxicty using the oral route , for substances other than gases, at least the acute toxicity data for one other route should be provided. This recommendation is fulfilled because there is an acute inhalation study available which was performed according to the respective guideline and GLP. Thus, there is no need to conduct an acute toxicity study using the dermal route..

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the available data no classification or labelling is required.