Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-151-7 | CAS number: 78-86-4
Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
Two studies on acute toxicity to daphnia are available, both being reliable. For hazard and risk assessment the LC50 value determined by IBR, being 99.9 mg/l (24 h) is taken forward as a worst case approach.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 99.9 mg/L
Additional information
Acute aquatic toxicity towards daphnia was tested in a GLP study performed in 1990 (IBR) and was found being harmful to daphnia showing an LC50 value of 99.9 mg/l (24 h). In another study performed 2002 by Wang et al. with daphnia a LC50 value (48 h) of 707.1 mg/l was determined. For hazard and risk assessment the value established by IBR is taken forward following a worst case approach.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
