Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 272-940-1 | CAS number: 68921-45-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Additional information
The substance is a UVCB liquid under all environmental conditions and is of low solubility in water and is of low volatility (based on 0.0015 Pa at 20 °C).
Any potential exposure to the environment would result in rapid redistribution from soil and water due to its volatility. The high adsorption to soil (based on the soil adsorption study, discussed below) indicates that the majority of the substance will partition to soil and sediment rather than water should it be released to the environment. This is supported by a Level III fugacity model in the US EPA EPISUITE (Mackay,) which assumes steady-state but not equilibrium conditions. The Level III model in EPI Suite predicts partitioning between air, soil, sediment and water using a combination of default parameters and various input parameters. This model has been used to calculate the theoretical distribution of the substance, based on the theoretical lowest and highest molecular weight compounds as follows:
|
Air (%) |
Water (%) |
Soil (%) |
Sediment (%) |
All derivatives |
0.00522 - 0.0612 |
0.701 - 18.4 |
38.7 - 80.7 |
0.835- 60.6 |
It should be noted that as the majority of the substance distributes to the soil compartment; and the low solubility in water, this indicates that the substance is likely to persist in this compartment rather than distribute to the soil pore water.It is proposed therefore that the majority of the substance is modelled to distribute to the soil and sediment compartments within the constraints of the QSAR model.
The substance is anticipated to display a low ready biodegradability. The substance is a substituted diphenylamine UVCB substance. Substituted Diphenylamines, which are used as antidegradants in rubber, foamed polymers and high-temperature functional fluids (lubricants, gear oils, hydraulic fluids), are defined as amines with various substitutions. Their use in these applications requires stability at high temperatures, low biodegradation, low water solubility and low vapor pressure.. Substituted Diphenylaminesas a group have been assessed under the US HPV programme in the “Substituted DiphenylaminesCategory”, sponsored by the American Chemistry Council’s Rubber and Plastic Additives Panel (RAPA). Utilising read across to an analogous substance, it is proposed that the substance is not readily biodegradable. The analogue achieved 8% biodegradation in a OECD Guideline 301 E Ready biodegradability: Modified OECD Screening Test, indicating that it is unlikely to achieve a half life of less than 40 or 60 days within fresh water attributed to ready biodegradation alone. No experimental studies on hydrolytic effects are available on the substance, as the solubility and UVCB natures precludes experimental analysis. Some minor degradation may be anticipated via this route on the basis of structure; however this is proposed to be minimal. Studies on direct phototransformation in water are not available, but it is assumed on the basis of chemical structure and nature of use that the substance is not degraded by direct photolysis. It is concluded, therefore, that whilst abiotic processes could contribute to the depletion of the substance within the environment, this is likely to be a slow process.
The substance has been demonstrated to have a relatively high partition coefficient value (Log Kow of 5.2) which demonstrates that there is the potential for this substance to accumulate biologically. However, given the UVCB nature of the substance, it is difficult to assess the substance using a standard test. Therefore an assessment was undertaken utilizing recognised QSAR derivation software as follows:
· BCF model (CAESAR) (version 2.1.11)
· BCF model (Meylan) (version 1.0.0)
· BCF Read-Across (version 1.0.0)
· US EPA On-Line EPI Suite™v4.0 model BCFBAF
An assessment of 50 potential structures that could be present was undertaken. These were selected at random for the purposes of the exercise. On the basis of a weight of evidence approach, there is sufficient information available to state that the substance is not bioaccumulative. Whilst it is not possible to provide a definitive BCF value for the substance, due to the variation in the results, none of the values determined via QSAR are above the threshold value quoted in the Regulation of 2000 or 5000 which indicates the potential to bioaccumulate. A geometric mean BCF is therefore applied for the purposes of hazard assessment.
Endpoint study |
Result (BCF) [geometric mean] |
EPIWIN BCFBAF Results [L/kg] |
36.60 |
BCF Read-Across (version 1.0.0) [L/kg] |
348.83 |
BCF model (CAESAR) (version 2.1.11) [L/kg] |
1274.0 |
BCF model (Meylan) (version 1.0.0) |
95.0 |
Geometric Mean BCF overall |
1754.04 |
Whilst this mean result is presented as only a general indication, this supports the overall conclusion that the substance is not considered to be bioaccumulative. The substance is not considered to be “bioaccumulative” or “very bioaccumulative” on the basis of the available data. The available mammalian repeat dose data on the Substituted Diphenylamines as a group would also generally support the fact that bioaccumulation does not occur, as no significant results were noted in these studies.
A screening organic carbon-water partitioning coefficient (Koc) is available for the substance, using a HPLC Estimation method. This resulted on a log Koc value of 5.48 at 35 °C with Koc of 300000. Adsorption to soil is therefore deemed to be high, based on the high associated test results. Such potential indicates that the substance is likely to bind tightly to soils and sediments and not partition at high levels in water. As such, significant exposure related effects to water dwelling organisms are considered to be negligible.
Three studies with terrestrial organisms are available for read-across substances. Results are as follows: OECD Guideline 208 (Terrestrial Plants Test: Seedling Emergence and Seedling Growth Test): Lowest NOEC: 63 mg/kg [Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato)] ; OECD Guideline 216 (Soil Microorganisms: Nitrogen Transformation Test): 28-d EC50 > 2500 mg substance/kg dry soil; OECD Guideline 222 (Earthworm Reproduction Test (Eisenia fetida/Eisenia andrei)): NOEC 62.5 mg/kg dry soil based on the numbers of juveniles produced. As can be seen, the effects on terrestrial organisms are not indicative of hazard to these types of organisms.
Based on its low water solubility, high partition coefficient and biodegradation rate it can be concluded that it is likely that the substance could potentially be persistent within the environment. Abiotic effects within the environment will result in eventual removal from the environment. Given the low mammalian toxicity and predicted bioaccumulation potential, it is expected that effects on organisms in the food chain can considered to be minimised.
Finally, the substance demonstrates low acute toxicity in mammalian studies. As it also is not anticipated to bioaccumulate, based on QSAR assessments, in the event of exposure to higher level organism via ingestion of environmental organisms, effects due to secondary poisoning can be excluded.
Reliability.
The studies have all been ranked reliability 1 or 2 according to the Klimish et al system. This ranking was deemed appropriate because although not all the studies were conducted to GLP in compliance with recognised guidelines, in the context of a group approach forSubstituted Diphenylamines, the data is consistent across the group.
Justification for classification or non classification
The substance fulfils the persistency criteria in that the Substituted Diphenylamines are not biodegradable and that no actual scientific data apart from QSAR exists to dispute the bioaccumulation potential assigned to the substance. As the substance also demonstrated effects on the mysid shrimp in an acute toxicity test, the following classification is applicable.
CLP Regulation (EC No 1272/2008): Aquatic Chronic 2; H411: Toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects.
A study was conducted in accordance with OECD Guideline 211 to determine the effects of read-across substance, 4-(1-methyl-1-phenylethyl)-N-[4-(1-methyl-1-phenylethyl)phenyl]aniline, on the survival, growth and reproduction of the cladoceran, Daphnia magna, during a 21-day exposure period under flow-through test conditions. The 21-day EC10 value based on the mean number of live neonates produced per adult at the beginning of the test was 16 μg a.i./L. Since the 95% confidence interval was outside of the data range used for the calculation, it was not reported. However, the EC10 value was not meaningful because the mean number of live neonates produced per adult at the beginning of the test in the 21 μg a.i./L did not follow a dose-response pattern. The EC50 value based on the mean number of live neonates produced per adult at the beginning of the test was >38 μg a.i./L, the highest concentration tested.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
