Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 225-590-9 | CAS number: 4948-15-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation/corrosion: non-irritating, no guideline/GLP, 0.02 ml of the test substance (filtrate), intracuteanous injection, rabbit, 1967, K2
Eye irritation: non-irritating, no guideline/GLP, 0.1 ml of the test substance (filtrate), rabbit, 1967, K2
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Remarks:
- Only a filtrate was used.
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The test for skin tolerability was carried out using the Barail test by intracutaneous injection. In a further test the undiluted aqueous filtrate was applied 5 times in 5 days in a quantity of 0.5 ml each time to the depilated and intact flank skin of rabbits.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Technically pure substance
The pigment was digested in 0.9% NaCl solution tor 1 hour at 40 ºC in a heating cabinet. The solution was then filtered off and the aqueous filtrate obtained. - Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- other: yellow-silver breed
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Housing: animals were kept in individual cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ALTROMIN K, manufactured by Altromin GmbH in Lage/Lippe
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: depilated and intact skin
- Vehicle:
- physiological saline
- Controls:
- not specified
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amounts applied: 0.5 mL
- Concentration applied: 2.5 g in 25 mL NaCl solution.
VEHICLE
- Concentration (if solution): pigment was digested in 0.9% NaCl solution for 1 hour at 40 ºC in a heating cabinet, the amount being 2.5 g in 25 ml NaCl solution. The solution was then filtered off and the aqueous filtrate obtained. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- applied 5 times in 5 days
- Observation period:
- No data
- Number of animals:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: none - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: not specified
- Remarks on result:
- other: not irritating
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: not specified
- Remarks on result:
- other: not irritating
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- All the injections were tolerated without reaction. No signs of irritation were observed after dermal application.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- All the injections were tolerated without reaction. No signs of irritation were observed after dermal application.
- Executive summary:
To test the skin and mucous membrane tolerability the test substance was digested in 0.9% NaCl solution for 1 hour at 40°C in a heating cabinet, the amount being 2.5 g in 25 ml NaCl solution. The solution was then filtered off and the aqueous filtrate obtained. Three rabbits of the yellow-silver breed were used as the experimental animals in each test. The test for skin tolerability was carried out using the Barail test by intracutaneous injection of in each case 0.02 ml of the undiluted filtrate or the filtrate diluted 1:10, 1:100 or 1:1000 into the depilated flank skin. 0.02 ml of 0.9% NaCl solution was injected for control purposes. All the injections were well tolerated without reaction. In a further test the undiluted aqueous filtrate was applied 5 times in 5 days in a quantity of 0.5 ml each time to the depilated and intact flank skin of rabbits. No signs of irritation were observed. Based on these results, the substance was considered to be not irritating.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Remarks:
- only a filtrate was tested.
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- eye irritation study
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- other: yellow-silver breed
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Housing: animals were kept in individual cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ALTROMIN K, manufactured by Altromin GmbH in Lage/Lippe
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water - Vehicle:
- other: The pigment was digested in 0.9% NaCl solution tor 1 hour at 40 ºC in a heating cabinet, the amount being 2.5 g in 25 mL NaCl solution. The solution was then filtered off and the aqueous filtrate obtained.
- Controls:
- not specified
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amounts applied: 0.1 mL
VEHICLE
- Concentration (if solution): pigment was digested in 0.9% NaCl solution for 1 hour at 40 ºC in a heating cabinet, the amount being 2.5 g in 25 ml NaCl solution. The solution was then filtered off and the aqueous filtrate obtained. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- one single application
- Observation period (in vivo):
- The animals were monitored for any signs of irritation 1, 3, 7 and 24 hours after application.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: none - Irritation parameter:
- other: signs of irritation in the ocular mucous membrane
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24 h
- Remarks on result:
- other: not irritating
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- The undiluted filtrate caused no signs of irritation in the ocular mucous membrane.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The undiluted filtrate caused no signs of irritation in the ocular mucous membrane.
- Executive summary:
The test article was digested in 0.9% NaCl solution for 1 hour at 40°C in a heating cabinet, the amount being 2.5 g in 25 ml NaCl solution. The solution was then filtered off and the aqueous filtrate obtained. The mucous membrane tolerability was tested by introducing 0.1 ml of the undiluted filtrate once into the conjunctival sac of the rabbit's eye. The animals were monitored tor any signs of irritation 1, 3, 7 and 24 hours after application (Hoechst, 1967). No signs of eye irritation were observed. Therefore, the test item was considered to be not irritating to the eyes.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin irritation
To test the skin and mucous membrane tolerability the test substance was digested in 0.9% NaCl solution for 1 hour at 40°C in a heating cabinet, the amount being 2.5 g in 25 ml NaCl solution. The solution was then filtered off and the aqueous filtrate obtained. Three rabbits of the yellow-silver breed were used as the experimental animals in each test. The test for skin tolerability was carried out using the Barail test by intracutaneous injection of in each case 0.02 ml of the undiluted filtrate or the filtrate diluted 1:10, 1:100 or 1:1000 into the depilated flank skin. 0.02 ml of 0.9% NaCl solution was injected for control purposes. All the injections were tolerated without reaction. In a further test the undiluted aqueous filtrate was applied 5 times in 5 days in a quantity of 0.5 ml each time to the depilated and intact flank skin of rabbits. No signs of irritation were observed. Based on these results, the substance was considered to be not irritating (Hoechst, 1967).
Eye irritation
The test article was digested in 0.9% NaCl solution for 1 hour at 40°C in a heating cabinet, the amount being 2.5 g in 25 ml NaCl solution. The solution was then filtered off and the aqueous filtrate obtained. The mucous membrane tolerability was tested by introducing 0.1 ml of the undiluted filtrate once into the conjunctival sac of the rabbit's eye. The animals were monitored tor any signs of irritation 1, 3, 7 and 24 hours after application (Hoechst, 1967). No signs of eye irritation were observed. Therefore, the test item was considered to be not irritating to the eyes.
Further toxicological data of category members:
Reliable data from several studies on irritation are available for the test article and for other members of the "perylene based pigments" category (see attached category justification). All of these data are taken into account for the evaluation and assessment of the irritation potential of the test article. Studies concerning the irritating potential for skin and eyes are available for all category members. In no study evidence for irritating or corrosive effects of the substances was observed. The category members can therefore all considered as not irritating to the skin and eyes.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Classification, Labelling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008
The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation 1272/2008. Studies for skin and eye irritation are available. In both studies, no signs of irritation were observed. As a result, the substance is not considered to be classified for skin or eye irritation under Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, as amended for the fourteenth time in Regulation (EC) No. 2020/217.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
