Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-555-1 | CAS number: 122-57-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 4 Oct 2019 - 10 Nov 2020
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 020
- Report date:
- 2020
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- 25th June 2018
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Cinnamaldehyde
- EC Number:
- 203-213-9
- EC Name:
- Cinnamaldehyde
- Cas Number:
- 104-55-2
- Molecular formula:
- C9H8O
- IUPAC Name:
- 3-phenylacrylaldehyde
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Animals were procured from CPCSEA approved vendor (Cadila Pharmaceuticals Limited, Ahmedabad; CPCSEA registration no. 161/PO/RcBiBt/S/99/CPCSEA)
- Age at study initiation: 10 - 12 weeks
- Housing: 1 - 3 rats in polycarbonate cage, during mating 2 females and 1 males per cage, pregnant femaleswere housed individually
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days prior to estrous cycle evaluation
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20.2 - 23.9
- Humidity (%): 46.2 - 66.5
- Air changes (per hr): 12
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: The test item was weighed and dissolved in corn oil to achieve the desired concentration of the test item at each dose level. Formulations were prepared on the same day or one day prior to dose administration and stored at room temperature until usage as the test item stability was proven up to 24 h in a previous validation study. At the time of dosing, dose formulations were kept on a magnetic stirrer for maintaining homogeneity of test formulation.
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): Corn oil was selected as vehicle based on a previously performed study. Corn oil is widely used as vehicle in oral toxicity studies and it is well tolerated at the selected dose volume
- Concentration in vehicle: 0, 31.25, 62.5, 125 mg/mL
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 4 mL/kg bw - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- The dose formulation samples from all dose groups were analysed. Two replicates of approximately 2 mL samples from each upper, middle and lower level were analysed during the first and the last week of treatment using a validated analytical method.
The obtained concentrations of the analysed formulations were 31.333, 62.081 and 124.428 mg/mL for the first week of treatment and 31.493, 61.284 and 122.898 mg/mL for the last week of treatment for low, mid and high dose levels, respectively. All these values fall in the acceptance limits of ±15% of the nominal concentrations for all the formulations. - Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- If cohoused:
- M/F ratio per cage: 1:2
- Proof of pregnancy: sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Pregnant females were exposed to test item from GD5 to GD19
- Frequency of treatment:
- once daily
- Duration of test:
- Until GD20
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 125 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- The substance was given by oral gavage to 25 pregnant Wistar rats at 0 (vehicle), 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day from GD 5 to 19. Due to unexpected mortality at 1000 mg/kg, an additional group of 25 pregnant Wistar rats treated at 125 mg/kg bw/day from GD 5 to 19 was included.
- Dose / conc.:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- The substance was given by oral gavage to 25 pregnant Wistar rats at 0 (vehicle), 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day from GD 5 to 19. Due to unexpected mortality at 1000 mg/kg, an additional group of 25 pregnant Wistar rats treated at 125 mg/kg bw/day from GD 5 to 19 was included.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 25 females
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: in consultation with the sponsor based on available information on the test substance
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): Randomization was done based on body weight of the pregnant females on GD0. The animals were assigned in an unbiased manner to control and treatment groups manually as per internal SOP. Females inseminated from the same male were evenly distributed across the groups. Individual body weights were within ±20% of the respective group mean after randomization. The mean group body weights on the day of randomization were analyzed by One-way ANOVA and it was found that the group means were statistically comparable to each group.
- Time of day for (rat) dam blood sampling: morning
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily, approx. 1 h after dose administration
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: at time of receipt, GD0, GD5, GD8, GD11, GD14, GD17, GD20
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): Yes
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day 20 - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes - Blood sampling:
- - Plasma: No
- Serum: Yes - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Head examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Anogenital distance of all live rodent pups: yes - Statistics:
- Raw data were processed using statistical software "Sigma Plot 14.0" (Supplied by Cranes Software International Ltd. Bangalore). The mean and standard deviation were calculated using the software and all data were summarized in tabular form. All continuous data (body weight, food consumption, hormone estimation, absolute and relative organ weights, maternal and pup parameters) were checked for normality using Shapiro Wilk test. All homogenous data was analysed using ANOVA and data showing significance in their variances was subjected to Dunnett's t-test, Dunn's Test, Kruskal-Wallis, ANOVA on ranks, Gross, skeletal and visceral abnormalities were represented as both, the total no. of fetuses and litters affected and the percentage of fetuses and litters affected. Further, the data of % incidences of abnormalities were analyzed for dose dependency by Pearson's correlation. P values of < 0.05 were deemed to be statistically significant.
- Indices:
- Pre-implantations loss = [(no. of corpora lutea − no. of implantations)/ no. of corpora lutea] x 100
Post-implantation loss = [(no. of resorptions)/ no. of total implantations] x 100
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
General toxicity (maternal animals)
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No treatment-related clinical signs or symptoms were observed in any animal up to 250 mg/kg bw/d. Symptoms of hypothermia, lethargy, prostration and excessive salivation were observed in all animals of the 500 mg/kg bw/d group starting from the first day of dosing until the termination. These clinical signs were evident from 1 h after dosing until the evening observation. However, no clinical signs were observed at the morning observation. This indicates that these signs were reversible in nature. No treatment-related clinical signs were observed in nesting/pregnancy behaviour in any of the animals.
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- One animal from the high dose group was found dead during morning observation on GD9 Although gross lesions on lung and stomach were observed in this animal, the exact cause of death could not be determined.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The mean body weight of pregnant and non-pregnant females remained camparable on GD 0, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17 and 20 for the control, 125 and 250 mg/kg bw/d group. The mean body weights of pregnant females on GD17 was significantly reduced in the 500 mg/kg bw/d group as compared to the control (p<0.05), whereas it remained comparable to the control on GD 0, 5, 8, 11 and 14. The % change in body weights with respect to GD0 was also statistically comparable among all the dose groups of pregnant and non-pregnant females, except for the decreased body weight gain in the 500 mg/kg bw/d group as compared to the control on GD17 (p<0.05). A trend of decrease in body weight and body weight gain was observed in pregnant females of the 500 mg/kg bw/d group compared to the control on GD20. Although it remained statistically insignificant due to high variation in the groups, the change in body weight and body weight gain at 500 mg/kg bw/d was considered as an effect of the test item.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The mean food consumed per day was significantly reduced in the 125 and 500 mg/kg bw/d groups on GD8 and GD11 when compared to the control group, while it remained statistically comparable among the groups at all other time points. Although the observed decrease in the food consumption of the 500 mg/kg bw/d group was considered to be an effect of the test item administration, it lacks toxicological significance due to its transient occurrence (significant reduction only on GD8 and GD11 and not on GD14, 17 and 20). On the contrary, the significant change observed in the 125 mg/kg bw/d group lacked dose-dependency and was therefore considered to be an inconsequential effect.
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Thyroid hormones (T3 and T4) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels in the sera were found to be statistically comparable among the control and treatment groups.
- Endocrine findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Thyroid hormones (T3 and T4) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels in the sera were found to be statistically comparable among the control and treatment groups. No significant difference in the absolute and relative weight of thyroid and parathyroid between the treatment groups and the control group were found. Three females in the 500 mg/kg bw/d group exhibited unilateral and bilateral congenital cysts in the thyroid gland. These were considered to be spontaneous in nature and not attributable to the test item
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No treatment-related clinical signs were observed in nesting/pregnancy behaviour in any of the animals.
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant difference in the absolute and relative weight of uterus, ovary, thyroid and parathyroid between the treatment groups and the control group were found.
- Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No gross findings were observed at 0 or 125 mg/kg. At 250 mg/kg, two animals showed pathological alterations in stomach which included white spots of muscular portion, increased size/swelling of muscular portions, and swelling of glandular portion. At 500 mg/kg, a total of 15 female animals showed pathological alterations in stomach which included white spots of muscular tissue, increased size of muscular portion, and increased size/swelling of glandular portion and red discolouration of the lung.
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
Microscopic findings at 250 mg/kg included focal hyperkeratosis in stomach in one animal (minimal in severity). At 500 mg/kg, microscopic findings included focal/multifocal hyperkeratosis in stomach; focal, erosion and oedema of muscular tissue in stomach, lymphocyte infiltration in muscular tissue in stomach, diffuse degeneration of glandular tissue in stomach and focal alveolar haemorrhage in lung in 7 animals. Minimal to moderate hyperkeratosis of stomach observed in most of the animals from the 500 mg/kg bw/d group were considered to be test item-related. This can be due to local irritation of the gastric mucosa.
Three females in the 500 mg/kg bw/d group exhibited unilateral and bilateral congenital cysts in the thyroid gland. These were considered to be spontaneous in nature and not attributable to the test item.- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The number of implantation sites and the pre-and post-implantation loss (%) remained unchanged in treatment groups when compared to control.
- Total litter losses by resorption:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant changes in the number of resorptions were observed in any dose groups.
- Early or late resorptions:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The early and late resorptions were found to be comparable among all the treatment groups and control group.
- Dead fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No dead foetuses were observed in any dose groups.
- Changes in pregnancy duration:
- not examined
- Changes in number of pregnant:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At termination 18/25, 24/25, 17/25 and 13/25 females were found to be pregnant from the control 125 mg/kg bw, 250 mg/kg bw, and 500 mg/kg bw dose groups, respectively. Pregnancy rates were calculated as 72%, 96%, 68% and 52% for the control, 125 mg/kg bw, 250 mg/kg bw/day, and 500 mg/kg dose groups, respectively. This observation indicates a statistically significant and dose-dependent effect of the test item on the pregnancy rate.
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
Effect levels (maternal animals)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- changes in number of pregnant
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- changes in number of pregnant
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Remarks:
- local
- Effect level:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- gross pathology
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- local
- Effect level:
- 125 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- gross pathology
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
Maternal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
Results (fetuses)
- Fetal body weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At 500 mg/kg, a significant decrease in female foetal weight (by 8.2%) and a significant decrease in sex-combined foetal weight (by 6.4%) were observed as compared to the control group. No other significant changes in foetal weight were observed.
- Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No reduction in number of live offspring was observed in any dose group when compared to control.
- Changes in sex ratio:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The sex ratios were comparable in all groups.
- Changes in litter size and weights:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant differences in litter size were observed in any groups.
- Anogenital distance of all rodent fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant differencein AGD were observed in any groups.
- Changes in postnatal survival:
- not examined
- External malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Gross external observation of foetuses revealed that 2.09, 3.79, 5.00 and 6.60 percentage of foetuses from control (G1), 125 (G5), 250 (G2) and 500 (G3) mg/kg bw/d, respectively, showed malformations/variations. The variation included haemorrhage:1.57 (G1), 2.07 (G5), 3.89 (G2), 4.72 (G3) % of foetuses and the malformations include: retarded growth (Runt): 0.52 (G1), 1.38 (G5), 0.56 (G2) and 1.89 (G3) % of foetuses; dome-shaped head: 1.03 (G5) and 0.94 (G3) % of foetuses; Anury (absence of tail): 0.56 (G2) % of foetuses. A significant correlation was found for the doses of test item and the total % of fetuses with malformations/variations (P<0.05). Further, when individual malformations/variations were compared, a significant increase in incidences of haemorrhage was observed in fetuses of the 500 mg/kg bw/d group as compared to the control group (P<0.05). However, no significant correlation was observed when litter was used as the unit for comparing the malformations/variations or when data of individual malformations/variations (other than haemorrhage) were compared. These observations were found to be independent of the treatment and rather seem to be spontaneous in nature.
- Skeletal malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- A number of skeletal variations/malformations were observed, however none of them were attributed to the test chemical since they lacked dose dependency and (or) were considered common to developing foetuses.
The following skeletal malformations/variations were observed in the skull: incomplete ossification of Frontal and Parietal observed in 1 /57 foetus at 500 mg/kg, dome-shaped Frontal and Parietal found in 1/150 foetus at 125 mg/kg, 1/57 at 500 mg/kg, flattened Parietal observed in 1/150 at 125 mg/kg and 1/57 at 500 mg/kg, fused Nasal, Premaxilla and Maxilla found in 1/150 at 250 mg/kg, elongated and bipartite Interparietal in 1/94 foetus at 250 mg/kg, small triangular-shaped Interparietal observed in 1/150 at 125 mg/kg, absence of Zygomatic in 2/94 at 250 mg/kg, absence of Hyoid in 2/100 foetuses at 0 mg/kg. Fused ribs were observed in 1/94 foetuses at 250 mg/kg, branched ribs in 1/57 foetuses at 500 mg/kg, misaligned ribs at 1/94 at 250 mg/kg and 2/57 foetuses at 500 mg/kg. Misaligned ribs were seen in 2/57 foetuses at 500 mg/kg, absent Thoracic, Lumbar, Sacral and caudal Vertebrae in 1/94 foetuses at 250 mg/kg. - Visceral malformations:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No variations/malformations were observed during visceral and head razor examinations in any of the groups.
- Other effects:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- A significant difference in crown to rump length was observed in the 125 mg/kg bw/d group when compared to the control (P<0.001). Such change was not observed in any other of the dose group and therefore it was considered to be an incidental finding.
Effect levels (fetuses)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- fetal/pup body weight changes
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- fetal/pup body weight changes
Fetal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1. Table for Maternal Evaluation
Groups | Control | Low Dose | Mid Dose | High Dose |
Dose (mg/kg body weight) | 0 | 125 | 250 | 500 |
Initial animals per group | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
Confirmed Pregnancy at necropsy | 18 | 24 | 17 | 13 |
Pregnancy rate (%) | 72 | 96 | 68 | 52 |
No. of Corpora lutea | 14.50 ± 2.62 | 13.33 ±1.97 | 13.94 ± 2.73 | 13.15 ± 2.34 |
No. of implantation sites | 12.44 ± 3.17 | 12.92 ± 1.84 | 12.24 ± 3.17 | 11.08 ± 3.80 |
No. of resorptions | 1.83 ± 2.81 | 0.83 ± 1.01 | 1.65 ± 2.26 | 1.92 ± 3.48 |
Pre-implantation loss (%) | 13.15 ± 20.98 | 2.91 ± 5.41 | 12.82 ±15.23 | 16.66 ± 25.53 |
Post-implantation loss (%) | 14.11 ± 22.04 | 6.19 ± 6.77 | 15.23 ± 22.21 | 18.66 ± 34.90 |
Litter size | 10.61 ± 3.81 | 12.08 ± 1.69 | 10.59 ± 4.18 | 8.83 ± 4.95 |
No of live foetuses | 10.61 ± 3.81 | 12.08 ± 1.69 | 10.59 ± 4.18 | 8.83 ± 4.95 |
No of dead foetuses | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Live Foetuses (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Values are represented as Mean± SD.
Pre-implantations loss = [(no. of corpora lutea − no. of implantations)/ no. of corpora lutea] x 100
Post-implantation loss = [(no. of resorptions)/ no. of total implantations] x 100
Table 2. Table for Body Weight
Pregnant Females
| |||||||||
Group | Dose (mg/kg) |
| Day of gestation and body weight in grams | ||||||
0 | 5 | 8 | 11 | 14 | 17 | 20 | |||
Control | 0 | Mean | 215.56 | 236.39 | 245.11 | 257.50 | 272.56 | 298.06 | 332.00 |
SD | 13.26 | 13.14 | 13.53 | 14.36 | 14.97 | 17.06 | 25.65 | ||
N | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | ||
Low Dose | 125 | Mean | 214.25 | 234.92 | 243.00 | 256.83 | 273.13 | 298.08 | 334.58 |
SD | 12.81 | 9.66 | 10.44 | 10.87 | 12.16 | 14.10 | 15.37 | ||
N | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | ||
Mid Dose | 250 | Mean | 213.94 | 237.00 | 244.94 | 258.06 | 272.41 | 294.35 | 330.18 |
SD | 12.23 | 14.83 | 16.37 | 17.83 | 21.72 | 25.19 | 32.90 | ||
N | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | ||
High Dose | 500 | Mean | 215.54 | 237.54 | 241.69 | 247.67 | 263.83 | 279.08↓ | 309.00 |
SD | 11.64 | 15.23 | 13.93 | 10.80 | 13.03 | 21.94 | 30.36 | ||
N | 13 | 13 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
↓: Decreased as compared to control (P<0.05)
Non-Pregnant Female
| |||||||||
Group | Dose (mg/kg) |
| Day of gestation and body weight in grams | ||||||
0 | 5 | 8 | 11 | 14 | 17 | 20 | |||
Control | 0 | Mean | 215.14 | 233.57 | 240.29 | 244.29 | 244.14 | 246.14 | 250.14 |
SD | 11.96 | 12.22 | 10.27 | 17.04 | 16.93 | 17.14 | 20.45 | ||
N | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | ||
Low Dose | 125 | Mean | 211.00 | 219.00 | 219.00 | 223.00 | 225.00 | 230.00 | 238.00 |
SD | ./. | ./. | ./. | ./. | ./. | ./. | ./. | ||
N | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
Mid Dose | 250 | Mean | 222.00 | 240.38 | 242.25 | 249.88 | 247.75 | 250.25 | 253.00 |
SD | 6.72 | 16.10 | 10.65 | 11.21 | 9.38 | 9.91 | 11.30 | ||
N | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | ||
High Dose | 500 | Mean | 223.33 | 242.58 | 242.50 | 245.33 | 242.83 | 242.25 | 248.33 |
SD | 15.20 | 22.44 | 19.64 | 20.83 | 15.80 | 15.78 | 16.74 | ||
N | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Table 3. Table for Body Weight Change
Pregnant Females
| ||||||||
Group | Dose (mg/kg) |
| Gestation Day and body weight change (%) | |||||
5 | 8 | 11 | 14 | 17 | 20 | |||
Control | 0 | Mean | 9.74 | 13.80 | 19.61 | 26.62 | 38.48 | 54.15 |
SD | 2.76 | 3.32 | 5.27 | 5.92 | 6.98 | 9.50 | ||
N | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | ||
Low Dose | 125 | Mean | 9.86 | 13.64 | 20.12 | 27.74 | 39.43 | 56.56 |
SD | 5.12 | 5.43 | 6.03 | 6.64 | 7.85 | 9.72 | ||
N | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | ||
Mid Dose | 250 | Mean | 10.80 | 14.51 | 20.64 | 27.32 | 37.55 | 54.29 |
SD | 3.85 | 4.48 | 5.23 | 7.07 | 8.19 | 12.13 | ||
N | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | ||
High Dose | 500 | Mean | 10.19 | 12.14 | 15.92 | 23.48 | 30.60↓ | 44.72 |
SD | 3.27 | 2.70 | 2.86 | 4.04 | 8.72 | 14.17 | ||
N | 13 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
↓: Decreased as compared to control (P<0.05)
Non-Pregnant Females
| ||||||||
Group | Dose (mg/kg) |
| Gestation Day and body weight change (%) | |||||
5 | 8 | 11 | 14 | 17 | 20 | |||
Control | 0 | Mean | 8.66 | 11.85 | 13.66 | 13.51 | 14.43 | 16.27 |
SD | 4.35 | 5.23 | 7.35 | 5.65 | 5.52 | 7.20 | ||
N | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | ||
Low Dose | 125 | Mean | 3.79 | 3.79 | 5.69 | 6.64 | 9.00 | 12.80 |
SD | ./. | ./. | ./. | ./. | ./. | ./. | ||
N | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
Mid Dose | 250 | Mean | 8.19 | 9.12 | 12.55 | 11.60 | 12.73 | 13.95 |
SD | 4.42 | 3.38 | 3.52 | 2.32 | 3.06 | 3.15 | ||
N | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | ||
High Dose | 500 | Mean | 8.88 | 8.92 | 10.15 | 9.00 | 8.65 | 11.34 |
SD | 9.71 | 9.58 | 9.78 | 7.38 | 5.89 | 5.80 | ||
N | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Table 4. Table for External Gross Evaluation of Foetuses
Group | Control | Low Dose | Mid Dose | High Dose |
Dose level (mg/kg body weight) | 0 | 125 | 250 | 500 |
Total No. of Litters with live foetuses | 18 | 24 | 17 | 11 |
Total No. of live Foetuses | 191 | 290 | 180 | 106 |
Total No. of Male Foetuses | 98 | 133 | 89 | 61 |
Total No. of Female Foetuses | 93 | 157 | 91 | 45 |
Weight of foetuses (g) | 3.74 ± 0.59 | 3.69 ± 0.35 | 3.57 ± 0.38 | 3.50 ± 0.37↓ |
Weight of male foetuses (g) | 3.82 ± 0.63 | 3.82 ± 0.30 | 3.64 ± 0.35 | 3.62 ± 0.32 |
Weight of female foetuses (g) | 3.65± 0.54 | 3.57 ± 0.35 | 3.51 ± 0.39 | 3.35 ± 0.40↓ |
Weight of Placenta (g) | 0.47 ± 0.09 | 0.49 ±0.07 | 0.50 ± 0.09 | 0.45 ± 0.09 |
Crown to rump length (cm) | 3.68 ± 0.23 | 3.41 ± 0.31↓↓↓ | 3.68 ± 0.28 | 3.67 ± 0.28 |
AGD of Male foetuses (mm) | 3.20 ± 0.33 | 3.10 ± 0.25 | 3.17 ± 0.26 | 3.10 ± 0.28 |
AGD of Female foetuses (mm) | 1.30 ± 0.21 | 1.28 ± 0.16 | 1.30 ± 0.35 | 1.27 ± 0.14 |
Normalised AGD of Male foetuses | 2.06 ± 0.23 | 1.98 ± 0.18 | 2.06 ± 0.16 | 2.02 ± 0.16 |
Normalised AGD of Female foetuses | 0.85 ± 0.14 | 0.84 ± 0.10 | 0.86 ± 0.27 | 0.85 ± 0.10 |
Male/Female sex ratio (per dam) | 1.31 ± 1.28 | 0.94 ± 0.45 | 1.25 ± 1.03 | 1.53 ± 1.28 |
External observations | ||||
Total no. of Foetuses with No Abnormality Detected | 187 | 279 | 171 | 99 |
Total no. of Foetuses with abnormalities | 4 | 11 | 9 | 7 |
Foetuses with abnormalities (%) | 2.09 | 3.79 | 5.00 | 6.60 ↑ |
Litters with abnormalities (%) | 5.56 | 33.33 | 35.29 | 27.27 |
Abnormalities | ||||
Haemorrhage (V) | 3(1) | 6(5) | 7(5) | 5(3) |
Haemorrhage (%) | 1.57(5.56) | 2.07(20.83) | 3.89(29.41) | 4.72(27,27) ↑ |
Runt (M) | 1(1) | 4(4) | 1(1) | 2(2) |
Runt (%) | 0.52(5.56) | 1.38(16.67) | 0.56(5.88) | 1.89(18.18) |
Anury (M) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 1(1) | 0(0) |
Anury (%) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0.56(5.88) | 0(0) |
Dome-shaped Head (M) | 0(0) | 3(3) | 0(0) | 1(1) |
Dome-shaped Head (%) | 0(0) | 1.03(12.50) | 0(0) | 0.94(9.09) |
Values are represented as Mean± SD; AGD: Anogenital distance; Normalised AGD: AGD/ Body weight(1/3); the incidence of the individual defect is presented as a number/ Percent of foetuses (number/ percent of litters); Abnormalities: includes malformations and variations; M: Malformations; V: Variations ↓:Decreased as compared to control (P<0.05); ↓↓↓:Decreased as compared to control (P<0.001); ↑:Increased as compared to control (P<0.05)
Table 5. Table for Skeletal Anomalies of the Foetuses
Groups | Control | Low Dose | Mid Dose | High Dose | ||||
Dose (mg/kg body weight) | 0 | 125 | 250 | 500 | ||||
| No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % |
Foetuses examined | 100 | 150 | 94 | 57 | ||||
No abnormality detected | 83 | 134 | 86 | 41 | ||||
Total and % Foetuses with abnormalities | 17 | 17.00 | 16 | 10.67 | 8 | 8.51 | 16 | 28.07 |
| Skull | |||||||
Incomplete ossification of Frontal & Parietal (V) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.75 |
Dome-shaped frontal and Parietal (M) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.67 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.75 |
Flattened Parietal (M) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.67 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fused Nasal, Premaxilla & Maxilla (M) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.67 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Elongated, Bipartite Interparietal (M) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.06 | 0 | 0 |
Small Triangular-shaped Interparietal (M) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.67 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Absence of Zygomatic (M) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2.13 | 0 | 0 |
Absence of Hyoid (M) | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ribs | |||||||
Fused (M) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.06 | 0 | 0 |
Branched (M) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.75 |
Misaligned (M) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.06 | 2 | 3.51 |
Absent (M) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sternebrae | |||||||
Unossified/Incompletely ossified Sternebrae (1 or more) (V) | 13 | 13.0 | 12 | 8.0 | 5 | 5.32 | 13 | 22.81 |
Misaligned (M) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3.51 |
| Vertebrae | |||||||
Unossified Caudal vertebrae (V) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Thoracic, Lumbar, Sacral and caudal Vertebrae absent (M) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.06 | 0 | 0 |
The incidence of the individual defect is presented as a number and percentages of litters
Abnormalities: includes malformations and variations; M: Malformations; V: Variations
Table 6. Table for Skeletal Anomalies of the Foetuses(with respect to Litters)
Groups | Control | Low Dose | Mid Dose | High Dose | ||||
Dose (mg/kg body weight) | 0 | 125 | 250 | 500 | ||||
| No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % |
Litters examined | 18 | 24 | 17 | 11 | ||||
No abnormality detected | 7 | 11 | 13 | 2 | ||||
Total and % Litters with abnormalities | 11 | 61.11 | 13 | 54.17 | 4 | 23.53 | 9 | 81.82 |
| Skull | |||||||
Incomplete ossification of Frontal & Parietal (V) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9.09 |
Dome-shaped frontal and Parietal (M) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.17 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9.09 |
Flattened Parietal (M) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fused Nasal, Premaxilla & Maxilla (M) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Elongated, Bipartite Interparietal (M) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5.88 | 0 | 0 |
Small Triangular-shaped Interparietal (M) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Absence of Zygomatic (M) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11.76 | 0 | 0 |
Absence of Hyoid (M) | 2 | 11.11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ribs | |||||||
Fused (M) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5.88 | 0 | 0 |
Branched (M) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9.09 |
Misaligned (M) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5.88 | 2 | 18.18 |
| Sternebrae | |||||||
Unossified/Incompletely ossified Sternebrae (1 or more) (V) | 9 | 50.0 | 11 | 45.83 | 3 | 17.65 | 6 | 54.55 |
Misaligned (M) | 1 | 5.56 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18.18 |
| Vertebrae | |||||||
Unossified Caudal vertebrae (V) | 1 | 5.56 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Thoracic, Lumbar, Sacral and caudal Vertebrae absent (M) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5.88 | 0 | 0 |
The incidence of the individual defect is presented as a number and percentages of litters
Abnormalities: includes malformations and variations; M: Malformations; V: Variations
Table 7. Table for Absolute Organ Weight
Pregnant | ||||||
Group | Dose (mg/ Kg) |
| Body weight | Uterus | Ovaries | |
Right | Left | |||||
Control | 0 | Mean | 332.00 | 61.73 | 0.0878 | 0.0818 |
SD | 25.65 | 20.64 | 0.0152 | 0.0208 | ||
N | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | ||
Low dose | 125 | Mean | 334.58 | 66.61 | 0.0791 | 0.0828 |
SD | 15.37 | 8.57 | 0.0197 | 0.0145 | ||
N | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | ||
Mid dose | 250 | Mean | 330.18 | 62.60 | 0.0860 | 0.0854 |
SD | 32.90 | 25.27 | 0.0138 | 0.0183 | ||
N | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | ||
High dose | 500 | Mean | 309.00 | 49.70 | 0.0861 | 0.0753 |
SD | 30.36 | 24.55 | 0.0202 | 0.0112 | ||
N | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Non-Pregnant | ||||||
Group | Dose (mg/ Kg) |
| Body weight | Uterus | Ovaries | |
Right | Left | |||||
Control | 0 | Mean | 250.14 | 0.87 | 0.0634 | 0.0706 |
SD | 20.45 | 0.14 | 0.0053 | 0.0083 | ||
N | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | ||
Low dose | 125 | Mean | 238.00 | 0.82 | 0.0655 | 0.0539 |
SD | ./. | ./. | ./. | ./. | ||
N | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
Mid dose | 250 | Mean | 253.00 | 0.88 | 0.1388 | 0.0712 |
SD | 11.30 | 0.14 | 0.2047 | 0.0074 | ||
N | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | ||
High dose | 500 | Mean | 248.33 | 1.10 | 0.07 | 0.08 |
SD | 16.74 | 0.41 | 0.0102 | 0.0100 | ||
N | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Table 8. Table for Relative Organ weight to Body weight
Pregnant | ||||||
Group | Dose (mg/ Kg) |
| Body weight | Uterus | Ovaries | |
Right | Left | |||||
Control | 0 | Mean | 332.00 | 18.41 | 0.0264 | 0.0249 |
SD | 25.65 | 5.63 | 0.0042 | 0.0073 | ||
N | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | ||
Low dose | 125 | Mean | 334.58 | 19.88 | 0.0237 | 0.0248 |
SD | 15.37 | 2.13 | 0.0059 | 0.0043 | ||
N | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | ||
Mid dose | 250 | Mean | 330.18 | 18.68 | 0.0261 | 0.0259 |
SD | 32.90 | 7.16 | 0.0040 | 0.0050 | ||
N | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | ||
High dose | 500 | Mean | 309.00 | 15.57 | 0.0278 | 0.0245 |
SD | 30.36 | 7.21 | 0.0053 | 0.0035 | ||
N | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Non Pregnant | ||||||
Group | Dose (mg/ Kg) |
| Body weight | Uterus | Ovaries | |
Right | Left | |||||
Control | 0 | Mean | 250.14 | 0.35 | 0.0255 | 0.0283 |
SD | 20.45 | 0.07 | 0.0027 | 0.0033 | ||
N | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | ||
Low dose | 125 | Mean | 238.00 | 0.35 | 0.0275 | 0.0226 |
SD | ./. | ./. | ./. | ./. | ||
N | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
Mid dose | 250 | Mean | 253.00 | 0.35 | 0.0534 | 0.0282 |
SD | 11.30 | 0.06 | 0.0761 | 0.0030 | ||
N | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | ||
High dose | 500 | Mean | 248.33 | 0.44 | 0.0277 | 0.0317 |
SD | 16.74 | 0.16 | 0.0045 | 0.0048 | ||
N | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Table 9. Table for Gross Pathology Observation
Pregnant Females | ||||
Group | Control | Low dose | Mid dose | High dose |
Dose (mg/kg) | 0 | 125 | 250 | 500 |
Total No. of TS Animals Observed | 18 | 24 | 17 | 13 |
Organ & Lesion | ||||
No. of animals with abnormalities | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
No. of animals with no abnormalities | 18 | 24 | 17 | 6 |
Stomach: Muscular portion | X | X | X | |
White Spot | X | X | X | |
Minimal | X | X | X | 1 |
Mild | X | X | X | 1 |
Moderate | X | X | X | 1 |
Severe | X | X | X | |
Increased size / swollen | X | X | X | |
Minimal | X | X | X | 1 |
Mild | X | X | X | 1 |
Moderate | X | X | X | 1 |
Glandular portion | X | X | X | |
Increased size / Swollen | X | X | X | |
Moderate | X | X | X | 1 |
Red Spot | X | X | X | |
Minimal | X | X | X | 1 |
Lung: Red discoloration | X | X | X | |
Minimal | X | X | X | 1 |
Mild | X | X | X | |
Moderate | X | X | X |
Note:All organs/tissues as plan were observed for study
Non-Pregnant Females | ||||
Group | Control | Low dose | Mid dose | High dose |
Dose (mg/kg) | 0 | 125 | 250 | 500 |
Total No. of TS Animals Observed | 7 | 1 | 8 | 12 |
Organ & Lesion | ||||
Abnormality Detected | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
No Abnormality Detected | 7 | 1 | 6 | 4 |
Stomach: Muscular portion | X | X | ||
White Spot | X | X | ||
Minimal | X | X | ||
Mild | X | X | 1 | 1 |
Moderate | X | X | 4 | |
Severe | X | X | 1 | |
Increased size / swollen | X | X | ||
Minimal | X | X | ||
Mild | X | X | 1 | |
Moderate | X | X | 1 | |
Glandular portion | X | X | ||
Increased size / Swollen | X | X | ||
Moderate | X | X | 1 | 1 |
Red Spot | X | X | ||
Minimal | X | X | 1 | |
Lung: Red discoloration | X | X | ||
Minimal | X | X | 1 | |
Mild | X | X | ||
Moderate | X | X |
Note:All organs/tissues as plan were observed for study
Table 10. Table for Microscopic Observation
Pregnant Females | ||||
Group | Control | Low dose | Mid dose | High dose |
Dose (mg/kg) | 0 | 125 | 250 | 500 |
Total No. of TS Animals Observed | 18 | 24 | 17 | 13 |
Organ & Lesion | ||||
Abnormality Detected | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
No Abnormality Detected | 18 | 24 | 17 | 6 |
Stomach:Muscular Stomach |
| |||
Hyperkeratosis |
| |||
Focal Minimal | X | X | X | 1 |
Focal Mild | X | X | X | 2 |
Multifocal Mild | X | X | X | 2 |
Diffuse Minimal | X | X | X | 1 |
Erosion |
| |||
Focal Mild | X | X | X | 1 |
Focal Moderate | X | X | X | 1 |
Edema |
| |||
Diffuse minimal | X | X | X | 1 |
Lymphocyte Infiltration |
| |||
Focal Minimal | X | X | X | 1 |
Glandular Stomach |
| |||
Degeneration |
| |||
Diffuse minimal | X | X | X | 1 |
Lung: Haemorrhage Alveolar |
| |||
Focal Minimal | X | X | X | 1 |
Thyroid:Congenital Cyst |
| |||
Unilateral | X | X | X | 1 |
Non-Pregnant Females | ||||
Group | Control | Low dose | Mid dose | High dose |
Dose (mg/kg) | 0 | 125 | 250 | 500 |
Total No. of TS Animals Observed | 7 | 1 | 8 | 12 |
Organ & Lesion | ||||
Abnormality Detected | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 |
No Abnormality Detected | 7 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Stomach:Muscular Stomach |
| |||
Hyperkeratosis |
| |||
Focal Minimal | X | X | 1 | 1 |
Focal Mild | X | X | 1 | |
Focal moderate | X | X | 1 | |
Multifocal Minimal | X | X | 1 | |
Multifocal Mild | X | X | 3 | |
Diffuse Minimal | X | X | 1 | |
Glandular Stomach |
| |||
Infiltration lymphocyte Mucosal |
| |||
Focal Mild | X | X | 1 | |
Thyroid:Congenital Cyst |
| |||
Bilateral | X | X | 1 | |
Unilateral | X | X | 1 |
Table 11. Table for Head Razor and Visceral Observation Record of Foetuses
Group | Control | Low dose | Mid dose | High dose |
Dose (mg/kg) | 0 | 125 | 250 | 500 |
Total No. of Foetuses Observed | 63 | 132 | 86 | 50 |
Abnormality Detected | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
No Abnormality Detected | 63 | 132 | 86 | 50 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Based on the results obtained under the experimental conditions used in this study, it is concluded that the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) and Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level (LOAEL) of Cinnamaldehyde (CAS No. 104-55-2) were 125 mg/kg bw/day and 250 mg/kg bw/day, respectively for general maternal toxicity. At 500 mg/kg bw/day of cinnamaldehyde (CAS No. 104-55-2) significant reductions were observed in pregnancy rate and mean foetal body weights. Therefore, the NOAEL and LOAEL of cinnamaldehyde (CAS No. 104-55-2) were 250 mg/kg bw/day and 500 mg/kg bw/day, respectively for developmental toxicity for both maternal and F1 generations.
- Executive summary:
The present study aimed to provide information on general and developmental toxicological endpoints associated with the repeated oral administration of graduated doses of Cinnamaldehyde (CAS No.104-55-2) to Wistar rats. For this purpose, the OECD test guideline 414 was followed. The study was performed in compliance with GLP.
A total of 125 pregnant female rats were randomised into 5 experimental groups each containing 25 animals. The groups, viz., G1, G5, G2, G3 and G4 received 0, 125, 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day, respectively. The initial doses of 0, 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg bw (G1, G2, G3 and G4) were selected based on the available data in the literature and a limited dose range finding study. The additional dose level of 125 mg/kg bw (G5) was included due to unexpected mortality at 1000 mg/kg bw (G4). Dose administration was through an oral gavage and the vehicle used in this study was corn oil. All groups were administered with dose formulation once daily from gestation day (GD) 5 to 19 (one day prior to scheduled sacrifice).
To ensure the accurate administration of the test item, the concentrations and homogeneity of the dose formulation were verified through formulation analyses in the first and last weeks of treatment. The results of these were found within the acceptable limits in both occasions.
Observations on the animals encompassed mortality/morbidity, onset of any clinical signs/symptoms, body weight, body weight changes, feed consumption, pregnancy observations, foetal developmental parameters, serum hormone levels, gross pathology and histopathology.
The results showed that Cinnamaldehyde (CAS No. 104-55-2) does not cause mortality up to doses of 250 mg/kg bw/d when administered orally to pregnant rats. However, mortality was observed for all animals treated at 1000 mg/kg bw/d and for one animal treated at 500 mg/kg bw/d.
No clinical signs or symptoms were observed in animals up to doses of 250 mg/kg bw/d (G2) throughout the duration of the experiment. At least one of the following symptoms was observed in all animals treated at 500 mg/kg bw (G3) from GD 5, 6 or 7 and onwards: hypothermia, lethargy, prostration and excessive salivation. At 1000 mg/kg bw (G4) at least one of the following symptoms were observed in most of the animals from GD 5 and onwards: abdominal breathing, abnormal gait, bradycardia, hypothermia, lethargy, prostration and excessive salivation. The mean body weight and percent change in body weight with respect to GD 0 remained comparable for G1, G5, G2 and G3 for all the time-points recorded with the exception of GD 17 wherein significant reductions in both the parameters were observed for G3 (500 mg/kg) with respect to the control group. Also, a trend of decrease in body weight and body weight gain was observed in pregnant females of G3 (500 mg/kg bw) as compared to G1 (Control) group on GD 20. Significant decrease in body weight and body weight gain on GD 8 was observed for G4 (1000 mg/kg bw) when compared with G1 (control). Further, feed consumption was reduced significantly on GD 8 for G5 (125 mg/kg bw), G3 (500 mg/kg bw) and G4 (1000 mg/kg bw) and on GD11, it was reduced significantly in G5 (125 mg/kg bw) and G3 (500 mg/kg bw) groups as compared to G1 (control) group. It remained statistically comparable among the experimental groups at every other point of observation. The changes in body weight, body weight gain and feed consumption were neither consistent nor did they seem dose-dependent for the dose levels up to 250 mg/kg bw and hence presume to be toxicologically insignificant. However, the significant difference observed in body weight and body weight gain in G3 (500 mg/kg body weight) and G4 (1000 mg/kg body weight) group was considered to be an effect of test item administration.
Thyroid hormones (T3 and T4) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels remained comparable across the groups for pregnant and non-pregnant females.
At termination 18/25, 24/25, 17/25, 13/25 and 9/25 females were found to be pregnant from G1 (control), G5 (125 mg/kg bw), G2 (250 mg/kg bw), G3 (500 mg/kg bw) and G4 (1000 mg/kg bw) group respectively. This observation indicates statistically significant and dose-dependent adverse effect of Cinnamaldehyde (CAS No. 104-55-2) on the pregnancy rate at 500 mg/kg bw and 1000 mg/kg bw. However, other maternal evaluation parameters including numbers of corpora lutea, implantation sites, resorptions and percentage of pre- and post-implantation loss remained comparable between all the treatment groups with control group. Further, no significant difference was observed for mean litter size or sex ratio between control and treatment groups.
No treatment-related changes were observed in absolute or relative weights of uterus, ovary, thyroid and parathyroid of pregnant and non-pregnant females.
The weights of placenta also remained comparable amongst all the groups. A statistically significant change, which was observed in crown-rump lengths of G5 (125 mg/kg bw) foetuses, was not found to be dose-dependent or treatment-related. However, significant decrease observed in the weights of female foetuses and combined weights of foetuses (male and female) in G3 (500 mg/kg bw) group as compared to control group were deemed to be treatment-related. Anogenital distance (AGD) and normalised AGD remained comparable with control for both male and female foetuses up to 500 mg/kg bw. No treatment-related gross, skeletal, or visceral malformations or variations were observed in the study.
Gross pathological and microscopic examination of females revealed lesions of the stomach in G2 (250 mg/kg bw), G3 (500 mg/kg bw) and G4 (1000 mg/kg bw) group and of the lung in G3 (500 mg/kg bw) and G4 (1000 mg/kg bw) group. These lesions were found to be dose-dependent and hence, related to Cinnamaldehyde (CAS No. 104-55-2) exposure.
Based on the results obtained under the experimental conditions used in this study, it is concluded that the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) and Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level (LOAEL) of Cinnamaldehyde (CAS No. 104-55-2) were 125 mg/kg bw/day and 250 mg/kg bw/day, respectively for general maternal toxicity. At 500 mg/kg bw/day of cinnamaldehyde (CAS No. 104-55-2) significant reductions were observed in pregnancy rate and mean foetal body weights. Therefore, the NOAEL and LOAEL of cinnamaldehyde (CAS No. 104-55-2) were 250 mg/kg bw/day and 500 mg/kg bw/day, respectively for developmental toxicity for both maternal and F1 generations.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
