Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
oxidising liquids
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From 08 July 2014 to 22 October 2014
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.21 (Oxidising Properties (Liquids))
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Contact with:
powdered cellulose
Key result
Sample tested:
test mixture 1:1
Parameter:
mean pressure rise time
Result:
21.2 s
Sample tested:
reference mixture with 65% nitric acid + cellulose (1:1 ratio)
Parameter:
mean pressure rise time
Result:
6 s

Pressure Rise Times for Test and Reference Mixtures:
























































Mixture



Run



Pressure rise time (seconds)



Mean pressure rise time (seconds)



Cellulose/Test substance



1



22.1



21.2



2



12.8



3



13.9



4



35.3



5



21.7



Cellulose/Reference substance



1



7.24



5.96



2



5.21



3



7.50



4



4.78



5



5.06



The mean pressure rise time for the reference mixture (1:1 w/w mixture of 65% w/w aqueous nitric acid and cellulose) was 6.0 seconds, while the mean pressure rise time for the test substance mixture (1:1 w/w mixture of the test substance and cellulose) was 21.2 seconds.


 


Since the mean pressure rise time and also the minimum pressure rise time for the test substance/cellulose mixture were much greater than that for the reference substance/cellulose mixture, the test substance was considered to be not oxidising.

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
2,2-Difluoroethyl acetate was demonstrated not to be an oxidizing liquid.
Executive summary:

The oxidising properties of 2,2-Difluoroethyl acetate was investigated in a GLP-compliant study according to the EU A.21 method. The mean pressure rise time of 2,2-Difluoroethyl acetate mixed with cellulose (1:1 ww ratio) was compared to the mean pressure rise time of a reference substance (65% w/w aqueous nitric acid) mixed with cellulose (1:1 ww ratio). Since the mean pressure rise time and also the minimum pressure rise time for the test substance/cellulose mixture were much greater than that for the reference substance/cellulose mixture, 2,2-Difluoroethyl acetate was considered to be non-oxidising.

Description of key information

2,2-Difluoroethyl acetate has no oxidizing properties.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Oxidising properties:
non oxidising

Additional information

An experimental study performed under GLP compliance and in accordance with EU A.21 method was flagged as a key study and assigned a Klimisch score of 1. It reports that 2,2-Difluoroethyl acetate has no oxidising properties.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the above described information, 2,2-Difluoroethyl acetate does not need to be classified for its oxidizing properties under CLP.