Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2007
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 007
- Report date:
- 2007
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 24 April 2002
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2,2`-[6-(phenylamino)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diyl]diphenol
- Cas Number:
- 1248-66-4
- Molecular formula:
- C21H16N4O2
- IUPAC Name:
- 2,2`-[6-(phenylamino)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diyl]diphenol
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CBA
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Netherlands
- Females (if applicable) nulliparous and non-pregnant: yes
- Age at study initiation: 7-8 weeks (beginning of acclimatisation)
- Housing: single in makrolon Type I, with wire mesh top
- Diet: pelleted standard diet ad libitum
- Water: tap water ad libitum
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 3°C
- Humidity (%): 30-76%
- Air changes (per hr):
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): artificial light 6.00 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Study design: in vivo (LLNA)
- Vehicle:
- dimethylformamide
- Concentration:
- 6.25, 12.5 and 25% (w/v)
- No. of animals per dose:
- 4 females (nulliparous and non-pregnant)
- Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS:
- Compound solubility: 25% suspension in dimethylformamide (highest technically applicable concentration)
- Irritation: treatment with 25% suspension did not induce irritation ;
MAIN STUDY
ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Criteria used to consider a positive response:
A test item is regarded as a sensitizer in the LLNA if the following criteria are fulfilled:
- First, that exposure to at least one concentration of the test item resulted in an incorporation of 3HTdR at least 3-fold or greater than that recorded in control mice, as indicated by a stimulation index.
- Second, that the data are compatible with a conventional dose response, although allowance must be made (especially at high dose concentrations) for ether local toxicity or immunological suppression;
TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION:
Each test group of mice was treated by topical (epidermal) application to the dorsal surface of each ear lobe (left and right) with different test item concentrations of 6.25, 12.5 and 25 % (w/v) in dimethylformaide. The application volume, 25 µl, was spread over the entire dorsal surface of each ear lobe once daily for three consecutive days. A further group mice was treated with an equivalent volume of the relevant vehicle alone (control animals).
Five days after the first topical application, all mices were administered with 250µl of 81.1 µCi/ml 3HTdR (corresponds to 20.3 µCi 3HTdR per mouse) by intravenous injection via a tail vein.
Approximately five hours after treatment with 3HTdR all mice were euthanised by intraperitoneal injection of Na-thiopental.
The draining lymph nodes were rapidly excised and pooled per group (8 nodes per group). Single cell suspensions were prepared, washed with phosphate buffered saline, resuspended in trichloroacetic acid, incubated for 18 h at 4°C;
The precipitates were than resuspended in 5% trichloroacetic acid (1ml) and transferred to plastic scintillation vials with 10 ml of "Ultima Gold" scintillation liquid and thoroughly mixed.
the 3HTdR incorporation was measured on a .beta.-scintillation counter. - Positive control substance(s):
- hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
- Statistics:
- the mean values and standard deviations were calculated for body weights
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- vehilcle: acetone: olive oil (4+1);
test item concentration (w/v), DPM lymph node, S.I.
5% , 936.1, 2.43
10 %, 1569.0, 4.07
25%, 1883.2, 4.88
In vivo (LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 6.42
- Test group / Remarks:
- 6.25% in vehicle
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 5.48
- Test group / Remarks:
- 12.5% in vehicle
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 6.33
- Test group / Remarks:
- 25% in vehicle
- Parameter:
- other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
- Remarks on result:
- other: DPM per lymph node: control: 1036.7 6.25 %: 6656.7 12.5 %: 5677.1 25 %: 6557.8
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- other: ambigous
- Conclusions:
- The test item was found to be a sensitizer under the described conditions;
however as there was no dose response the test result is somewhat ambigous; moreover a structurally very closely related substance is not classified as a sensitizer based on a guinea pig sensitizing test. Due to these diverting results it was decided to perform a G.P.M.T. to clarify the result of the LLNA; - Executive summary:
In the study the test item suspended in dimethyl formamide was assessed for its possible contact allergenic potential. For this purpose a local lymph node assay was performed using test item concentrations of 6.25, 12.5, and 25%. The animals did not show any clinical signs during the course of the study and no cases of mortality were observed. In the present study Stimulation Indices (S.I.) of 6.42, 5.48, and 6.33 were determined with the test item at concentrations of 6.25, 12.5, and 25% in dimethyl formamide, respectively.
The test item was found to be a skin sensitizer. Since the S.I. was increased above the threshold of 3 even at the lowest tested concentration, an EC3 value could not be derived.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.