Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 216-885-3 | CAS number: 1689-99-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 05 Jul - 19 Jul 1993
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 993
- Report date:
- 1993
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 1983
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 2020
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- no strain with AT base pair at the primary reversion site used (e.g. TA 102 or E. coli WP2 uvrA), no justification for choice of vehicle and no historical control data provided
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial forward mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2,6-dibromo-4-cyanophenyl octanoate
- EC Number:
- 216-885-3
- EC Name:
- 2,6-dibromo-4-cyanophenyl octanoate
- Cas Number:
- 1689-99-2
- Molecular formula:
- C15H17Br2NO2
- IUPAC Name:
- 2,6-dibromo-4-cyanophenyl octanoate
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- His operon (Salmonella strains)
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of male Fischer 344 rats treated with Aroclor 1254 i.p. at a dose of 500 mg/kg bw in corn oil; the cofactor solution was composed as follows: 0.05 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 8 mM MgCI2x6H2O, 33 mM KCI, 25 mM glucose-6-phosphate (disodium salt), 4 mM NADP (disodium salt). The S9 mix was composed of 9 parts Cofactor solution and 1 part S9 fraction. The final concentration in culture was approximately 1.85% for S9 fraction and 18.5% for S9 mix.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Toxicity experiment with TA 100 only:
with and without metabolic activation: 33, 100, 333, 1000, 3333, 10000 µg/plate
Mutation experiment 1 and 2:
with and without metabolic activation: 33, 100, 333, 1000, 3333, 10000 µg/plate
No toxicity to the bacteria was observed up to 10000 µg/plate, but precipitation of the test material was observed at this concentration. Therefore, based on the results of the cytotoxicity experiment, the highest dose selected for the mutation test was 10000 µg/plate. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle/solvent used: Dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO)
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene (2-AAN): TA 1535 and TA 1537 2 µg/plate and TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100 0.5 µg/plate; + S9
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: triplicate
- Number of independent experiments : 2
METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Test substance added: in agar (plate incorporation)
TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: approximately 48 h
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: decrease in the number of revertant colonies per plate and/or by a thinning or disappearance of the bacterial background lawn - Rationale for test conditions:
- according to OECD guideline 471
- Evaluation criteria:
- Acceptability
A test was considered acceptable if for each strain:
- the bacteria demonstrated their typical responses to crystal violet, ampicillin and UV light
- at least 2 of the vehicle control plates were within the following ranges: TA 1535, 4-30; TA 1537, 1-20; TA 98, 10-60; TA 100, 60-200 and TA 1538, 5-35
- on at least 2 of the positive control plates there were x 2 the mean vehicle control mutant numbers per plate, or in the case of TA 100, x 1.5 the mean vehicle control mutant numbers per plate. If the mean colony count on the vehicle control plates was less than 10 then a value of 10 was assumed for assessment purposes. In such cases a minimum count of 20 was required on at least 2 of the positive control plates.
- no toxicity or contamination was observed in at least 4 dose levels
- in cases where a mutagenic response was observed, that no more than one dose level was discarded before the dose which gave the highest significant mean colony number
Evaluation
A significant mutagenic response was recorded if:
- for S. typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538 and TA 98, at least a doubling of the mean concurrent vehicle control values at some concentrations of the test substance and, for S. typhimurium strain TA 100, a 1.5-fold increase over the control value were observed. If the mean colony count on the vehicle control plates was less than 10 then a value of 10 was assumed for assessment purposes. In such cases a minimum count of 20 was required before a significant mutagenic response was identified.
- a dose related response was observed, although at high dose levels this relationship could be inverted because of, e.g. (1) toxicity to the bacteria generally, (2) specific toxicity to the mutants and (3) inhibition of foreign compound metabolizing enzymes where mutagens require metabolic activation by the liver.
- a reproducible effect in independent tests was observed. - Statistics:
- No statistical analysis was done.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 3333 µg/plate in the presence of S9 and tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 3333 µg/plate in the presence of S9 and tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 10000 µg/plate in the presence of S9 and tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 10000 µg/plate in the presence of S9 and tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation and time of the determination: Precipitation of the test material occurred at 10000 µg/plate in all conditions.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
In the cytotoxicity experiment, no toxicity to the bacteria was observed up to 10000 µg/plate.
STUDY RESULTS
All criteria for a valid experiment were met. At 10000 µg/plate, cytotoxicity to the bacteria occurred in the presence of S9 mix only, in all strains, except TA1535. Cytotoxicity was also observed at 3333 µg/plate in TA1537 in both experiments and TA1538 in the second experiment only.
The test substance did not induce any significant, dose-dependent increases in the revertant numbers of any strain at any of the concentrations studied. For details, please refer to the attachment 1.
The solvent control induced the expected results and the standard positive controls induced marked increases in revertant numbers, thus, confirming the suitability and sensitivity of the assay.
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA
Detailed historical control data were not provided.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The study was performed in compliance with GLP and according to OECD guideline 471. Main deviations to the current OECD guideline 471 (adopted 2020) are related to the use of bacterial strains with only GC base pair at the primary reversion site (instead of TA 102 or E. coli WP2 uvrA) and the lack of historical control data. However, the study is considered reliable and valid. Under the conditions of the assay, the test item was not mutagenic up to 10000 µg/plate in the S. typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537 and TA 1538 with and without metabolic activation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.