Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 216-885-3 | CAS number: 1689-99-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to terrestrial plants
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to terrestrial plants: short-term
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 13 Jun - 16 Aug, 1990
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPP 122-1 (Terrestrial Plant Toxicity Tier I (vegetative vigor))
- Version / remarks:
- 1982
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPP 123-1 (Vegetative Vigor Tier II)
- Version / remarks:
- 1982
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- missing info on test species, slight deviation of environmental conditions and no analytical verification according to the report. Plant stage at initiation, observation timing, number of plants are slightly different from current OECD 227 requirements.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- The solution samples were inadvertently not treated prior to analysis and do not provide analytical confirmation of the exposure solutions. Consequently, the results of the vegetative vigor tests are reported as nominal test concentrations.
- Vehicle:
- yes
- Remarks:
- acetone
- Details on preparation and application of test substrate:
- A primary stock solution of 437 mg a.i./L (nominal) was prepared by diluting 0.0899 grams of test substance (0.08738 grams active ingredient) with acetone to volume in a 200 mL volumetric flask. The appropriate amounts of this stock solution were diluted to a 50 mL volume with acetone in graduated cylinders. Each dilution was poured into a separate amber glass bottle, to each of which 450 mL of NANOpure water was added.
Replicate pots (3) were grouped and sprayed with 30 ml_ of the appropriate solution 7 days after the seedlings were planted in untreated sand, except for carrot, which were sprayed 21 days after planting.
The control pots were prepared using the same process as the treatment pots, but were sprayed with 30 mL of distilled water.
Additionally, the solvent control plants were treated in a similar manner with a 1:10 solution of acetone to distilled water. This concentration contains an amount of acetone equivalent to the amount applied during each treatment. - Species:
- Avena sativa
- Plant group:
- Monocotyledonae (monocots)
- Details on test organisms:
- Supplied by Gries Seed Farm, Inc., Fremont, Ohio.
Lot: S1 289-9 - Species:
- Lactuca sativa
- Plant group:
- Dicotyledonae (dicots)
- Details on test organisms:
- Supplied by Carolina Biological Supply Company, Burlington, North Carolina.
Lot: S1 289-8 - Species:
- Glycine max (G. soja)
- Plant group:
- Dicotyledonae (dicots)
- Details on test organisms:
- Supplied by Carolina Biological Supply Company, Burlington, North Carolina.
Lot: S490-5
Variety: Maryard - Species:
- Zea mays
- Plant group:
- Monocotyledonae (monocots)
- Details on test organisms:
- Supplied by Carolina Biological Supply Company, Burlington, North Carolina.
Lot: S490-3
Variety: field corn - Species:
- Lycopersicon esculentum
- Plant group:
- Dicotyledonae (dicots)
- Details on test organisms:
- Supplied by Vermont Bean Seed Company, Fair Haven, Vermont.
Lot: S589-9
Variety: New Yorker - Species:
- Lolium perenne
- Plant group:
- Monocotyledonae (monocots)
- Details on test organisms:
- Supplied by Carolina Biological Supply Company, Burlington, North Carolina.
Lot: S690-6 - Species:
- Cucumis sativus
- Plant group:
- Dicotyledonae (dicots)
- Details on test organisms:
- Supplied by Carolina Biological Supply Company, Burlington, North Carolina
Lot: 690-5 - Species:
- Daucus carota
- Plant group:
- Dicotyledonae (dicots)
- Details on test organisms:
- Supplied by Vermont Bean Seed Company, Fair Haven, Vermont.
Lot: S589-11
Variety: Scarlet Nantes - Species:
- Brassica oleracea var. capitata
- Plant group:
- Dicotyledonae (dicots)
- Details on test organisms:
- Supplied by Vermont Bean Seed Company, Fair Haven, Vermont.
Lot: S589-10
Variety: Early Jersey - Species:
- Allium cepa
- Plant group:
- Monocotyledonae (monocots)
- Details on test organisms:
- Supplied by Vermont Bean Seed Company, Fair Haven, Vermont.
Lot: S589-7
Variety: sweet spanish yellow - Test type:
- vegetative vigour test
- Study type:
- laboratory study
- Substrate type:
- artificial soil
- Remarks:
- silica sand
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 14 d
- Remarks:
- Observations performed 14 days after application
- Test temperature:
- 16 - 29 °C
- pH:
- 7.8
- Moisture:
- 48 - 72 %
- Details on test conditions:
- Each replicate exposure unit consisted of a 13 cm tall polypropylene pot containing approximately 1.5 kg of washed, 20-40 mesh silica sand as support medium, equivalent to a sand depth of 10 cm per pot.
Nutrient solution was provided on a daily basis during the 14-day treatment period by subirrigation.
Three replicate trays were maintained for each test species per concentration. Separate growth chambers of similar design were used.
Germinated seedlings of uniform root and shoot development were impartially selected and randomly transplanted into untreated sand. Seedlings were handled carefully during the transplanting process to prevent damage. Five seedlings were planted in each pot containing support medium, except that one extra carrot and onion seedling was planted per pot. This was done to ensure five healthy seedlings were available for the treatment phase. Each pot was placed in an individual saucer and nutrient medium was added to the saucer. Approximately 250 mL of nutrient solution was added to the surface of the silica sand in each pot prior to planting the seedlings. The carrot and onion seedlings were planted in the same manner as the other species and were thinned to five seedlings per pot on the day of treatment.
Individual seedling shoot lengths were measured and recorded on the day of but prior to the application of Bromoxynil and weekly thereafter. Observations of morphological abnormalities were also made on the same days. At test termination, 14 days post-treatment, shoots were severed from the roots at sand level, measured and collected. - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentrations for lettuce: 0.012, 0.024, 0.048, 0.095 and 0.19 Ibs a.i./A
Nominal concentrations for all other species: 0.024, 0.048, 0.095, 0.19 and 0.38 Ibs a.i./A - Key result
- Species:
- other: Brassica oleracea and Lycopersicon esculentum
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- ca. 0.024 lbs/acre
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- growth
- Remarks on result:
- other: equivalent to 26.90 mg a.i./ha and 0.036 mg a.i./kg dry soil
- Key result
- Species:
- Lycopersicon esculentum
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- ca. 0.041 lbs/acre
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- growth
- Remarks:
- Shoot weight
- Remarks on result:
- other: equivalent to 45.96 g a.i./ha and 0.061 mg a.i./kg dry soil
- Details on results:
- All control, solvent control and treatment plants were healthy prior to the application of the test material.
At termination, cabbage, carrot, corn, lettuce and tomato exhibited significant concentration-related reductions. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- The present guideline study was conducted in compliance with GLP. Under the test conditions used, the overall EC50 (14 d) was 0.041 lbs a.i./A equivalent to 45.96 g a.i./ha or 0.061 mg a.i./kg dws, based on Lycopersicon esculentum shoot length parameter. The overall NOEC (14 d) was 0.024 lbs a.i./A equivalent to 26.9 g a.s./ha or 0.036 mg a.i./kg dws.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to terrestrial plants: short-term
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 13 Jun - 16 Aug, 1990
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPP 122-1 (Terrestrial Plant Toxicity Tier I (seedling emergence))
- Version / remarks:
- 1982
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPP 123-1 (Seedling Emergence Tier II)
- Version / remarks:
- 1982
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- missing info on test species according to the report. Seed number, observation timing, control % emergence and survival slightly different from current OECD 208 requirements.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- The nutrient test solutions used to treat the sand were sampled to confirm the concentration of test substance at test initiation. Three Quality Control samples were prepared and remained with the set of samples from each testing period throughout the analyses.
- Vehicle:
- yes
- Remarks:
- acetone
- Details on preparation and application of test substrate:
- For the definitive tests, a 22.12 mg a.i./mL (nominal) stock solution was prepared by diluting 4.5515 grams of test substance (4.4241 grams active ingredient) with acetone to volume in a 200 mL volumetric flask. The lower four desired nominal stock concentrations were prepared by diluting the appropriate amount of stock solution to volume with 100 mL of acetone. To produce the test solutions, 0.325 mL of the primary and each secondary stock solution were added to separate silanized 4 L glass vessels, each containing 3.25 L of nutrient solution. To prepare the solvent control solution, 0.325 mL of acetone was added to 3.25 L of nutrient solution. Control and solvent control vessels were also silanized prior to use. Each test solution was stirred for approximately five minutes just prior to treatment of the sand to ensure that the test solutions were homogeneous.
- Species:
- Avena sativa
- Plant group:
- Monocotyledonae (monocots)
- Details on test organisms:
- Supplied by Gries Seed Farm, Inc., Fremont, Ohio.
Lot: S1 289-9 - Species:
- Lactuca sativa
- Plant group:
- Dicotyledonae (dicots)
- Details on test organisms:
- Supplied by Carolina Biological Supply Company, Burlington, North Carolina.
Lot: S1 289-8 - Species:
- Glycine max (G. soja)
- Plant group:
- Dicotyledonae (dicots)
- Details on test organisms:
- Supplied by Carolina Biological Supply Company, Burlington, North Carolina.
Lot: S490-5
Variety: Maryard - Species:
- Zea mays
- Plant group:
- Monocotyledonae (monocots)
- Details on test organisms:
- Supplied by Carolina Biological Supply Company, Burlington, North Carolina.
Lot: S490-3
Variety: field corn - Species:
- Lycopersicon esculentum
- Plant group:
- Dicotyledonae (dicots)
- Details on test organisms:
- Supplied by Park Seed, Greenwood, South Carolina.
Lot: S490-1
Variety: beefmaster - Species:
- Lolium perenne
- Plant group:
- Monocotyledonae (monocots)
- Details on test organisms:
- Supplied by Carolina Biological Supply Company, Burlington, North Carolina.
Lot: S589-1 - Species:
- Cucumis sativus
- Plant group:
- Dicotyledonae (dicots)
- Details on test organisms:
- Supplied by Carolina Biological Supply Company, Burlington, North Carolina
Lot: 690-5 - Species:
- Daucus carota
- Plant group:
- Dicotyledonae (dicots)
- Details on test organisms:
- Supplied by Carolina Biological Supply Company, Burlington, North Carolina.
Lot: S490-4
Variety: Danvers Half longs - Species:
- Brassica oleracea var. capitata
- Plant group:
- Dicotyledonae (dicots)
- Details on test organisms:
- Supplied by Park Seed, Greenwood, South Carolina.
Lot: S490-2
Variety: green jewel - Species:
- Allium cepa
- Plant group:
- Monocotyledonae (monocots)
- Details on test organisms:
- Supplied by Gries Seed Farm, Inc., Fremont, Ohio.
Lot: S690-6
Variety: sweet winter - Test type:
- seedling emergence toxicity test
- Study type:
- laboratory study
- Substrate type:
- artificial soil
- Remarks:
- silica sand
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 14 d
- Remarks:
- Observations performed 14 days after application
- Test temperature:
- 22 - 28 °C
- pH:
- 7.8
- Moisture:
- 62 - 80 %
- Details on test conditions:
- Each replicate exposure unit consisted of a 13 cm tall polypropylene pot containing approximately 1.5 kg of washed, 20-40 mesh silica sand as support medium, equivalent to a sand depth of 10 cm per pot.
Nutrient solution was provided on a daily basis during the 14-day treatment period by subirrigation.
Three replicate trays were maintained for each test species per concentration. Separate growth chambers of similar design were used for the emergence and vegetative vigor tests.
Artificial lighting was provided for the emergence tests using a combination of commercial 75 watt fluorescent and 25 watt incandescent bulbs.
Each replicate pot was observed on test days 10 and 14 (test termination) to determine the percent seedling emergence. Morphological abnormalities of the emerged shoots (e.g., scaling, wilting, mildew, chlorosis, leaf blotch, foliar lesions, necrosis) were also recorded at each observation interval. Additionally, the shoot length of each seedling surviving to test termination was measured. - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentrations: 0.024, 0.048, 0.095, 0.19 and 0.38 Ibs a.i./A for all species. Additional concentrations for lettuce only: 0.095, 0.048, 0.024, 0.012 and 0.006 Ibs a.i./A.
Mean measured concentrations for corn, cucumber, lettuce, onion, ryegrass, soybean and tomato: 0.015, 0.048, 0.091, 0.18 and 0.17 lbs a.i./A (ranging from 44.7 to100 % of the nominal)
Mean measured for cabbage, carrot and oat: 0.023, 0.027, 0.11 and 0.47 lbs a.i./A (ranging form 56.7 to 123 %) - Key result
- Species:
- Brassica oleracea var. capitata
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- ca. 0.027 lbs/acre
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (initial)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- growth
- Remarks:
- Shoot length
- Remarks on result:
- other: equivalent to 30.26 mg a.i./ha and 0.0403 mg a.i./kg dry soil
- Key result
- Species:
- Lactuca sativa
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- ca. 0.16 lbs/acre
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (initial)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- growth
- Remarks:
- length
- Remarks on result:
- other: equivalent to 179.3 g a.i./ha and 0.239 mg a.i./kg dry soil
- Details on results:
- At test termination, none of the morphological abnormalities (e.g. chlorosis, necrosis, leaf blotch, wilt) observed during the seedling emergence test for any species were apparently related to the concentration of test substance. All emerged cucumber and onion plants survived until test
termination. Occasional mortalities of corn, ryegrass, soybean and tomato plants were observed but were not believed to be concentration-related. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- The present guideline study was conducted in compliance with GLP. Under the test conditions used, the overall EC50 (14 d) was 0.16 lbs a.i./A equivalent to 179.3 g a.i./ha or 0.239 mg a.i./kg dws, based on Lactuca sativa shoot length parameter. The overall NOEC (14 d) was 0.027 lbs a.i./A equivalent to 30.26 g a.i./ha or 0.0403 mg a.i./kg dws, based on Brassica oleracea shoot length parameter.
Referenceopen allclose all
Please refer to "overall remark/ attached background material" field for result tables.
Please refer to "overall remark/ attached background material" field for result tables.
Description of key information
The overall ER50 and NOER was 0.041 lbs/acre (equivalent to 0.061 mg a.i./kg dws) and 0.024 lbs/acre (equivalent to 0.036 mg a.i./kg dws) for vegetative vigor study.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Short-term EC50 or LC50 for terrestrial plants:
- 0.061 mg/kg soil dw
- Long-term EC10, LC10 or NOEC for terrestrial plants:
- 0.036 mg/kg soil dw
Additional information
One GLP-study is available for toxicity testing to terrestrial plants and was identified as key study.
In the key study (1990), the toxicity to terrestrial plants was investigated in a 14-day test on seedling emergence (application by incorporation with soil substrate), on vegetative vigor (application as spray) and on germination (filter paper dampened) according to US EPA 1222-1 and 123-1 guidelines. Ten species (4 monocotyledonous and 6 dicotyledonous) were exposed to nominal concentrations of 0.006, 0.012, 0.024, 0.048, 0.095, 0.19 and 0.38 Ibs a.i./A, alongside with a control, for seedling emergence and vegetative vigor. Ten species (4 monocotyledonous and 6 dicotyledonous) were exposed to nominal concentrations of 0.069, 0.14, 0.28, 0.55 and 1.1 mg a.i./L for germination test. The lowest ER50and NOER was 0.041 lbs/acre (equivalent to 0.061 mg a.i./kg dws) and 0.024 lbs/acre (equivalent to 0.036 mg a.i./kg dws) for vegetative vigor studyafter 14 days exposure for survival and shoot height and weight.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.