Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 17/07/2019 to 12/08/2019
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 020
- Report date:
- 2020
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: ICH S2(R1) guideline adopted June 2012 (ICH S2(R1) Federal Register. Adopted 2012; 77:33748-33749)
- Version / remarks:
- June 2012
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- 30 May 2008
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- (4E)-2,4-dimethyl-5-(4-methylphenyl)pent-4-enal
- Cas Number:
- 1226911-73-4
- Molecular formula:
- C14H18O
- IUPAC Name:
- (4E)-2,4-dimethyl-5-(4-methylphenyl)pent-4-enal
- Test material form:
- liquid
- Details on test material:
- - Physical state: Liquid
- Storage condition of test material: approximately 4ºC, in the dark and under nitrogen
- Other: colourless liquid
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Salmonella strains: histidine locus
E. coli strain: Tryptophan locus
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: rfa- (increase permeability of bacterial cells to larger molecules); uvrB- (inactivation of the excision repair system) for all salmonella strains, and plasmid pKM101 R factor for TA98 and TA100 (to enhance chemical and UV induced mutagenesis)
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: uvrA- : DNA repair deficiency which enhances its sensitivity to some mutagenic compounds
- Cytokinesis block (if used):
- Not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
Rat liver S9
- source of S9
: purchased from Moltox, Lot No. 4061 (Exp 1) and 4123 (Exp 2)
- method of preparation of S9 mix :
The S9-mix was prepared before use using sterilized co-factors and maintained on ice for the duration of the test.
S9: 5.0 mL; 1.65 M KCl/0.4 M MgCl2: 1.0 mL; 0.1 M Glucose-6-phosphate: 2.5 mL; 0.1 M NADP 2.0 mL; 0.2 M Sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4): 25.0 mL; Sterile distilled water: 14.5 mL.
A 0.5 mL aliquot of S9-mix and 2 mL of molten, trace histidine or tryptophan supplemented, top agar were overlaid onto a sterile Vogel-Bonner Minimal agar plate in order to assess the sterility of the S9-mix. This procedure was repeated, in triplicate, on the day of each experiment.
- concentration: 10% of S9 in the S9-mix
- quality controls of S9 (e.g., enzymatic activity, sterility, metabolic capability): S9 Quality Control and Production Certificates are available in the study report. - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1: The maximum concentration was 5000 μg/plate (the OECD TG 471 maximum recommended dose level). Eight concentrations of the test item (1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 μg/plate) were originally assayed in triplicate against each tester strain.
However, the test item induced excessive toxicity (resulting in an insufficient number of non-toxic dose concentrations) to all of the tester strains dosed in the absence of metabolic activation and, therefore, part of the experiment was repeated using an amended dose range of 0.015, 0.05, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15 and 50 μg/plate.
Experiment 2:
The dose range used for Experiment 2 was determined by the results of Experiment 1 and was as follows:
All tester strains (absence of S9-mix): 0.015, 0.05, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50 μg/plate.
All tester strains (presence of S9 mix): 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500 μg/plate. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle:
The test item was immiscible in sterile distilled water at 50 mg/mL but was fully miscible in dimethyl sulphoxide at the same concentration in solubility checks performed in-house.
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 9-aminoacridine
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- other: 2-aminoanthracene (2AA)
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: triplicate
- Number of independent experiments
: 2
METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
The test item was suspected to be volatile, therefore all testing was performed using the pre-incubation method (20 minutes at 37 ± 3 °C) except for the untreated controls. For volatile substances, the pre-incubation method may increase exposure of the bacteria to the test item in comparison to the standard plate incorporation method.
TREATMENT SCHEDULE:
- Preincubation period: 20 minutes
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment:
the plates were incubated in sealed anaerobic jars or bags at 37 ± 3 °C for between 48 and 72 hours
SELECTIVE AGENT: histidine, Tryptophan deficient agar
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: reduction of the growth of the bacterial background lawn by microscopically assessment of the plate's thinning
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENTS OF GENOTOXICIY
: presence of revertant colonies using an automated colony counting system. - Rationale for test conditions:
- In accordance with the OECD TG 471 guidelines.
- Evaluation criteria:
- There are several criteria for determining a positive result. Any, one, or all of the following can be used to determine the overall result of the study:
1. A dose-related increase in mutant frequency over the dose range tested (De Serres and Shelby, 1979).
2. A reproducible increase at one or more concentrations.
3. Biological relevance against in-house historical control ranges.
4. A fold increase greater than two times the concurrent solvent control for TA100, TA98 and WP2uvrA or a three-fold increase for TA1535 and TA1537 (especially if accompanied by an out-of-historical range response (Cariello and Piegorsch, 1996)).
5. Statistical analysis of data as determined by UKEMS (Mahon et al., 1989).
A test item will be considered non-mutagenic (negative) in the test system if the above criteria are not met.
Although most experiments will give clear positive or negative results, in some instances the data generated will prohibit making a definite judgment about test item activity. Results of this type will be reported as equivocal. - Statistics:
- Statistical significance was confirmed by using Dunnetts Regression Analysis (* = p < 0.05) for those values that indicate statistically significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies compared to the concurrent solvent control.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- see tables 3 to 6
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA98 and TA100 rfa, uvrB, pKM101
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- see tables 3 to 6
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA1535 and TA1537, rfa, uvrB
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- see tables 3 to 6
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation and time of the determination: No test item precipitate was
observed on the plates at any of the doses tested in either the presence or absence of S9-mix.
STUDY RESULTS
- Concurrent vehicle negative and positive control data: Results for the negative controls (spontaneous mutation rates) were considered to be acceptable (see tables 1 and 2 below). The vehicle (dimethyl sulphoxide) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated.
Ames test:
- Signs of toxicity: in the experiment 1, the maximum dose level of the test item was selected as the OECD TG 471 recommended dose level of 5000 μg/plate. However, the test item induced excessive toxicity to all of the tester strains dosed in the absence of metabolic activation (S9-mix) and, therefore, part of the experiment was repeated using an amended dose range of 0.015 to 50 μg/plate.
The test item induced a toxic response with weakened bacterial background lawns noted to all of the tester strains dosed in the absence of metabolic activation (S9-mix) at and above 15 μg/plate. In the presence of metabolic activation (S9-mix), weakened bacterial background lawns were initially noted from 150 μg/plate (all of the Salmonella strains) and 500 μg/plate (WP2uvrA).
In the experiment 2, the test item again induced a toxic response with weakened bacterial background lawns noted in the absence of metabolic activation (S9-mix) from 15 μg/plate (all of the Salmonella strains) and 50 μg/plate (WP2uvrA). In the presence of metabolic activation (S9-mix), weakened bacterial background lawns were noted from 150 μg/plate (TA100 and TA1537) and 500 μg/plate (TA1535,TA98 and WP2uvrA).
- Mean number of revertant colonies per plate and standard deviation: There were no significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9-mix) in both experiments.
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (with ranges, means and standard deviation, as well as the number of data)
- Positive historical control data: the current positive HCD dataset is presented in the full study report
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: The combined Vehicle and untreated control HCD dataset is presented in the full study report
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Spontaneous Mutation Rates (Concurrent Negative Controls) in Experiment 1
Number of revertants (mean number of colonies per plate) | |||||
Base-pair substitution type | Frameshift type | ||||
TA100 | TA1535 | WP2uvrA | TA98 | TA1537 | |
96 | 29 | 34 | 26 | 29 | |
103 (104) | 23 (23) | 34 (35) | 39 | (34) | 25 (25) |
112 | 16 | 38 | 36 | 21 | |
147 | 21 | 38 | 44 | 15 | |
120 (135)† | 15 (20)† | 36 (38)† | 31 | (35)† | 13 (13)† |
138 | 24 | 40 | 30 | 10 |
Table 2: Spontaneous Mutation Rates (Concurrent Negative Controls) in Experiment 2
Number of revertants (mean number of colonies per plate) | |||||||
Base-pair substitution type | Frameshift type | ||||||
TA100 | TA1535 | WP2uvrA | TA98 | TA1537 | |||
131 | 9 | 23 | 27 | 15 | |||
112 (120) | 14 | (14) | 28 (26) | 24 | (23) | 9 | (11) |
116 | 20 | 27 | 18 | 9 |
Table 3: Results of Experiment 1 - without metabolic activation (pre-incubation method)
Test Period | From: 01 August 2019 | To: 04 August 2019 | |||||
S9-Mix (-) | Dose Level Per Plate | Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD | |||||
Base-pair substitution strains | Frameshift strains | ||||||
TA100 | TA1535 | WP2uvrA | TA98 | TA1537 | |||
Solvent Control (DMSO) | 130 (133) 131 4.9# 139 | 17 (16) 15 1.0 16 | 44 (33) 27 9.3 29 | 24 (27) 30 3.1 26 | 13 (14) 14 0.6 14 | ||
0.015 µg | 141 134 (141) 148 7.0 | 13 16 (15) 15 1.5 | 29 40 (33) 29 6.4 | 25 30 (28) 29 2.6 | 13 13 (16) 23 5.8 | ||
0.05 µg | 146 127 (134) 130 10.2 | 14 17 (16) 18 2.1 | 25 17 (21) 22 4.0 | 29 24 (25) 22 3.6 | 9 10 (11) 15 3.2 | ||
0.15 µg | 126 164 (153) 168 23.2 | 15 18 (16) 16 1.5 | 31 34 (32) 32 1.5 | 27 33 (30) 31 3.1 | 19 13 (15) 13 3.5 | ||
0.5 µg | 147 154 (146) 138 8.0 | 8 22 (13) 10 7.6 | 37 33 (33) 30 3.5 | 29 28 (28) 26 1.5 | 16 22 (17) 12 5.0 | ||
1.5 µg | 162 (148) 135 13.5 148 | 12 (14) 17 2.5 14 | 48 (41) 28 11.5 48 | 35 (32) 27 4.6 35 | 18 (14) 11 3.6 13 | ||
5 µg | 160 (153) 143 8.9 156 | 14 (15) 22 6.1 10 | 34 (34) 31 3.0 37 | 36 (32) 35 6.7 24 | 12 (15) 10 6.4 22 | ||
15 µg | 143 S 158 S (158) 172 S 14.5 | 11 S 17 S (14) 15 S 3.1 | 31 S 37 S (33) 31 S 3.5 | 38 S 39 S (35) 29 S 5.5 | 16 S 14 S (15) 14 S 1.2 | ||
50 µg | 0 V 0 V (0) 0 V 0.0 | 17 S 11 S (14) 13 S 3.1 | 10 V 12 V (13) 16 V 3.1 | 26 S 33 S (30) 32 S 3.8 | 0 T 0 T (0) 0 T 0.0 |
ENNG N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
4NQO 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide
9AA 9-Aminoacridine
S Sparse bacterial background lawn
T Toxic, no bacterial background lawn
V Very weak bacterial background lawn
# Standard deviation
Table 4: Results of Experiment 1 - with metabolic activation (pre-incubation method)
Test Period | From: 25 July 2019 | To: 28 July 2019 | |||||
S9-Mix (+) | Dose Level Per Plate | Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD | |||||
Base-pair substitution strains | Frameshift strains | ||||||
TA100 | TA1535 | WP2uvrA | TA98 | TA1537 | |||
Solvent Control (DMSO) | 95 (91) 86 4.5# 91 | 15 (13) 9 3.8 16 | 40 (41) 44 2.3 40 | 26 (31) 30 6.1 38 | 21 (22) 21 1.2 23 | ||
1.5 µg | 92 83 (87) 85 4.7 | 17 16 (14) 8 4.9 | 46 31 (36) 30 9.0 | 36 40 (35) 28 6.1 | 24 16 (19) 16 4.6 | ||
5 µg | 96 98 (95) 90 4.2 | 29 17 (20) 13 8.3 | 55 37 (48) 52 9.6 | 32 37 (32) 27 5.0 | 26 21 (24) 25 2.6 | ||
15 µg | 90 107 (101) 106 9.5 | 21 24 (20) 16 4.0 | 56 45 (48) 42 7.4 | 36 29 (32) 31 3.6 | 25 24 (25) 25 0.6 | ||
50 µg | 91 103 (94) 88 7.9 | 16 27 (19) 14 7.0 | 44 42 (43) 44 1.2 | 33 34 (31) 25 4.9 | 22 32 (26) 24 5.3 | ||
150 µg | 0 V (0) 0 V 0.0 0 V | 18 S (18) 23 S 4.5 14 S | 41 (37) 37 3.5 34 | 32 S (29) 28 S 2.6 27 S | 15 S (19) 27 S 6.9 15 S | ||
500 µg | 0 T (0) 0 T 0.0 0 T | 0 T (0) 0 T 0.0 0 T | 37 S (40) 47 S 5.8 37 S | 0 V (0) 0 V 0.0 0 V | 0 V (0) 0 V 0.0 0 V | ||
1500 µg | 0 T 0 T (0) 0 T 0.0 | 0 T 0 T (0) 0 T 0.0 | 35 S 45 S (37) 32 S 6.8 | 0 V 0 V (0) 0 V 0.0 | 0 T 0 T (0) 0 T 0.0 | ||
5000 µg | 0 T 0 T (0) 0 T 0.0 | 0 T 0 T (0) 0 T 0.0 | 56 S 57 S (55) 52 S 2.6 | 0 T 0 T (0) 0 T 0.0 | 0 T 0 T (0) 0 T 0.0 | ||
Positive controls S9-Mix (+) | Name Dose Level No. of Revertants | 2AA | 2AA | 2AA | BP | 2AA | |
1 µg | 2 µg | 10 µg | 5 µg | 2 µg | |||
1571 (1494) 1522 93.6 1390 | 241 (273) 260 40.1 318 | 138 (148) 155 9.1 152 | 121 (116) 101 13.6 127 | 165 (172) 170 7.6 180 |
BP Benzo(a)pyrene
2AA 2-Aminoanthracene
S Sparse bacterial background lawn
T Toxic, no bacterial background lawn
V Very weak bacterial background lawn
# Standard deviation
Table 5: Results of Experiment 2 - without metabolic activation (pre-incubation method)
Test Period | From: 08 August 2019 | To: 11 August 2019 | |||||
S9-Mix (-) | Dose Level Per Plate | Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD | |||||
Base-pair substitution strains | Frameshift strains | ||||||
TA100 | TA1535 | WP2uvrA | TA98 | TA1537 | |||
Solvent Control (DMSO) | 113 (113) 122 9.5# 103 | 11 (11) 9 2.0 13 | 23 (25) 23 4.0 30 | 26 (25) 17 8.0 33 | 16 (12) 10 3.5 10 | ||
0.015 µg | 113 110 (110) 106 3.5 | 13 8 (12) 16 4.0 | 35 17 (29) 35 10.4 | 19 17 (20) 25 4.2 | 12 6 (9) 9 3.0 | ||
0.05 µg | 129 119 (121) 115 7.2 | 12 11 (11) 10 1.0 | 29 23 (31) 41 9.2 | 27 31 (25) 17 7.2 | 4 7 (7) 11 3.5 | ||
0.15 µg | 100 123 (112) 113 11.5 | 11 6 (9) 11 2.9 | 38 24 (31) 30 7.0 | 25 29 (25) 20 4.5 | 11 6 (9) 11 2.9 | ||
0.5 µg | 108 98 (103) 102 5.0 | 5 15 (8) 5 5.8 | 23 23 (24) 26 1.7 | 13 13 (19) 32 11.0 | 18 20 (16) 11 4.7 | ||
1.5 µg | 114 (111) 109 2.5 111 | 10 (10) 13 2.5 8 | 30 (29) 31 3.2 25 | 25 (27) 16 12.1 40 | 12 (12) 9 3.5 16 | ||
5 µg | 111 (111) 101 9.5 120 | 14 (10) 8 3.5 8 | 24 (20) 21 4.0 16 | 20 (20) 21 1.0 19 | 14 (12) 11 1.7 11 | ||
15 µg | 86 S 86 S (85) 83 S 1.7 | 11 S 9 S (11) 13 S 2.0 | 31 25 (27) 26 3.2 | 15 S 33 S (23) 21 S 9.2 | 7 S 9 S (8) 8 S 1.0 | ||
50 µg | 89 S 70 S (84) 93 S 12.3 | 10 S 6 S (8) 9 S 2.1 | 15 S 29 S (26) 35 S 10.3 | 0 V 0 V (0) 0 V 0.0 | 0 V 0 V (0) 0 V 0.0 | ||
Positive controls S9-Mix (-) | Name Dose Level No. of Revertants | ENNG | ENNG | ENNG | 4NQO | 9AA | |
3 µg | 5 µg | 2 µg | 0.2 µg | 80 µg | |||
376 (344) 258 75.3 398 | 769 (1341) 2145 716.6 1110 | 517 (498) 499 19.5 478 | 156 (181) 186 23.4 202 | 211 (187) 201 33.3 149 |
ENNG N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
4NQO 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide
9AA 9-Aminoacridine
S Sparse bacterial background lawn
V Very weak bacterial background lawn
# Standard deviation
Table 6: Results of Experiment 2 - with metabolic activation (pre-incubation method)
Test Period | From: 08 August 2019 | To: 11 August 2019 | |||||
S9-Mix (+) | Dose Level Per Plate | Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD | |||||
Base-pair substitution strains | Frameshift strains | ||||||
TA100 | TA1535 | WP2uvrA | TA98 | TA1537 | |||
Solvent Control (DMSO) | 100 (104) 101 6.7# 112 | 14 (13) 14 2.3 10 | 31 (41) 48 8.7 43 | 26 (27) 29 1.5 27 | 18 (14) 11 3.6 13 | ||
0.15 µg | 115 106 (104) 92 11.6 | 6 14 (10) 11 4.0 | 36 46 (42) 45 5.5 | 30 25 (25) 21 4.5 | 12 10 (11) 10 1.2 | ||
0.5 µg | 94 112 (101) 98 9.5 | 14 15 (13) 11 2.1 | 29 40 (39) 49 10.0 | 27 31 (26) 19 6.1 | 14 7 (10) 8 3.8 | ||
1.5 µg | 80 102 (105) 133 26.6 | 18 12 (16) 17 3.2 | 41 47 (48) 57 8.1 | 21 23 (22) 21 1.2 | 15 12 (13) 12 1.7 | ||
5 µg | 108 130 (117) 113 11.5 | 6 8 (9) 13 3.6 | 47 42 (46) 48 3.2 | 17 28 (27) 35 9.1 | 17 18 (18) 19 1.0 | ||
15 µg | 116 (118) 119 1.5 118 | 9 (7) 7 2.5 4 | 50 (45) 39 5.6 46 | 33 (29) 27 3.5 27 | 9 (12) 14 2.6 13 | ||
50 µg | 98 (110) 122 12.0 111 | 21 (13) 11 7.6 6 | 32 (39) 43 5.9 41 | 29 (25) 19 5.1 26 | 17 (12) 13 5.6 6 | ||
150 µg | 64 S 67 S (66) 66 S 1.5 | 11 9 (13) 18 4.7 | 34 42 (37) 35 4.4 | 35 34 (31) 24 6.1 | 6 S 7 S (7) 9 S 1.5 | ||
500 µg | 0 T 0 T (0) 0 T 0.0 | 11 S 6 S (7) 5 S 3.2 | 40 S 32 S (35) 33 S 4.4 | 0 V 0 V (0) 0 V 0.0 | 0 V 0 V (0) 0 V 0.0 | ||
Positive controls S9-Mix (+) | Name Dose Level No. of Revertants | 2AA | 2AA | 2AA | BP | 2AA | |
1 µg | 2 µg | 10 µg | 5 µg | 2 µg | |||
1306 (1366) 1397 52.3 1396 | 202 (217) 226 13.3 224 | 110 (110) 110 0.0 110 | 154 (159) 151 11.4 172 | 131 (147) 145 17.6 166 |
BP Benzo(a)pyrene
2AA 2-Aminoanthracene
S Sparse bacterial background lawn
T Toxic, no bacterial background lawn
V Very weak bacterial background lawn
# Standard deviation
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this study, the test item was considered to be non-mutagenic in the presence and absence of S9 activation.
- Executive summary:
ST 08 C 19 was tested to evaluate its potential mutagenicity in a bacterial reverse mutation assay using S.typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E.coli strain WP2uvrA-. The study was performed according to the requirements of OECD Guideline 471, EU Method B13/14, US EPA OCSPP 870.5100 and Japanese guidelines for bacterial mutagenicity testing and under GLP conditions.
Bacteria were exposed to the test item diluted in DMSO vehicle using the pre-incubation method in two independent experiments at up to eight dose levels, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolizing system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors).
Due to excessive toxicity observed without metabolic activation in the experiment 1, the concentration selected for the first experiment were in the range of 0.015 to 50 µg/plate without metabolic activation and 1.5 to 5000 µg/plate with metabolic activation. The concentration range for Experiment 2 was amended following the results of Experiment 1 and was 0.015 to 50 µg/plate without metabolic activation and 0.15 to 500 μg/plate with metabolic activation. Eight test item concentrations per bacterial strain were selected in Experiment 2 in order to achieve four non toxic dose levels and to achieve the toxic limit of the test item.The vehicle (dimethyl sulphoxide) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated. No test item precipitate was observed on the plates at any of the doses tested in either the presence or absence of S9-mix. Cytotoxicity was observed in all tester strains with and without metbaolic activation in both experiments (visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns).
There were no significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9-mix) in both experiments.
It was concluded that, under the conditions of this assay, the test substance gave a negative, i.e. non-mutagenic response in S.typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E.coli strain WP2uvrA- in the presence and absence of S-9 mix.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.