Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Workers - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
1 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
100
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
100 mg/kg bw/day
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
100% absorption assumed, worst case
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
2
Justification:
Extrapolation from sub-chronic to chronic exposure as per R8 guidance
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
4
Justification:
Default extrapolation from rat to man as per R8 guidance
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
Default assessment factors to cover remaining differences
AF for intraspecies differences:
5
Justification:
Assessment factor for worker population as per R8 guidance
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Workers - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - workers

A worst case scenario was adopted at the route to route extrapolation stage (100% absorption via dermal route). Default assessment factors were applied as stipulated in Table R.8.6 of ECHA Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Chapter R8: Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for human health.

General Population - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
0.5 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
200
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
100 mg/kg bw/day
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
100 % absorption is assumed via both routes in both species.
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
2
Justification:
Assessment factor for extrapolation from sub-chronic to chronic exposure as per R8 guidance
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
4
Justification:
Assessment factor for allometric scaling from rat to man as per R8 guidance
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
Assessment factor for remaining differences as per R8 guidance
AF for intraspecies differences:
10
Justification:
Default assessment factor for general population as per R8 guidance
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

General Population - Hazard via oral route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
0.5 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
200
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
100 mg/kg bw/day
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Not required
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
2
Justification:
Assessment factor for extrapolation from sub-chronic to chronic exposure as per R8 guidance
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
4
Justification:
Assessment factor for allometric scaling from rat to man as per R8 guidance
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
Assessment factor for remaining interspecies differences as per R8 guidance
AF for intraspecies differences:
10
Justification:
Default assessment factor for general population variation
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - General Population

A worst case scenario was adopted at the route to route extrapolation stage. Default assessment factors were applied as stipulated in Table R.8.6 of ECHA Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Chapter R8: Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for human health.