Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 10 Nov - 12 Dec 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 301 A (Ready Biodegradability: DOC Die Away Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 17 Jul. 1992
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- See section "Any other information on material and methods incl tables"
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.4-A (Determination of the "Ready" Biodegradability - Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) Die-Away Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 30 May 2008
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- See section "Any other information on material and methods incl tables"
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Landesamt für Umwelt Rheinland-Pfalz, Mainz, Germany
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- activated sludge, domestic, non-adapted
- Details on inoculum:
- - Source of inoculum/activated sludge: Sludge was taken from the activation basin of the ESN (Stadtentsorgung Neustadt) sewage treatment plant, Im Altenschemel, NW-Lachen-Speyerdorf. Date of collection: 14. Nov. 2017, batch no: 20171114
- Preparation of inoculum for exposure: The sludge was filtrated through a clean cotton cloth, then washed with medium 2x, and resuspended in test medium. It was then aerated until use in the test.
- Preparations: The inoculum was taken from its source, washed, aerated and the dry matter was determined
- Concentration of sludge: Determination of dry matter gave 4760 mg suspended solids/L.
- Initial cell/biomass concentration: 24.9 mg/L (Inoculum concentration) - Duration of test (contact time):
- 28 d
- Initial conc.:
- 40 mg/L
- Based on:
- other: organic carbon of test item
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- DOC removal
- Details on study design:
- TEST CONDITIONS
- Composition of medium: medium was used which is recommended in the guideline
- Test temperature: 19.7 – 21.3 °C
- pH: 7.4
- pH adjusted: no
- Aeration of dilution water: yes
- Suspended solids concentration: 4760 mg suspended solids/L
- Continuous darkness: yes
TEST SYSTEM
- Culturing apparatus: 500 mL-ERLENMEYER-flasks were used as test vessels, all glassware was cleaned with the laboratory cleaning agent and then rinsed with tap water (3x), diluted HCL (1x), tap water (3x) and diluted water (3x).
- Number of culture flasks/concentration: Control (2), Positive control (2), Test item (2), Abiotic control (1), Adsorption control (1), Toxicity control (1),
- Measuring equipment: DOC was determined as difference between TC (total carbon) and IC (inorganic carbon) using the carbon analyser TOC multi N/C 2100S, Analytik Jena. Each filtrated sample was measured in duplicate or triplicate, respectively (depending on the variation between the
measured values). The carbon analyser was calibrated with freshly prepared reference solutions (C8H5KO4 for TC, Na2CO3 and NaHCO3 for IC) once per month.
SAMPLING
- Sampling frequency: after 3 hours and on days 2, 7, 10, 14, 17, 22 and 28
- Sampling method: From each replicate, 8 samples were taken in order to determine the DOC. The sample volume was 2 mL. The samples were filtrated (0.45 μm Nylon filters).
CONTROL AND BLANK SYSTEM
- Inoculum blank: 2
- Abiotic sterile control: 1
- Adsorption control: 1
- Toxicity control: 1
- Positive control: 1
- Reference substance:
- aniline
- Remarks:
- Phenylamine, C6H5NH2, CAS-No. 62-53-3
- Parameter:
- % degradation (DOC removal)
- Value:
- 96.7
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- For further details please refer to “Any other information on results incl. tables”.
- Interpretation of results:
- readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- The pass level was reached at day 14 with 88.4 %. Therefore, test item Reaction mass of potassium sodium phosphotartrate and potassium sodium tartrate and potassium sodium orthophosphate (aqueous solution) is readily biodegradable following OECD 301A and EU C.4-A respectively.
Reference
Results for the Test item
- The pass level was reached at day 14 with 88.4 %
- The degree of biodegradation reached 97 % after 28 days.
- The test item can be considered as „readily biodegradable"
Table 1: DOC Values in mg/L
Day |
Control 1 |
Control 2 |
Positive Control 1 |
Positive Control 2 |
Test 1 |
Test 2 |
Abiotic Control |
Adsorption Control |
Toxicity Control |
0.125 |
1.72 |
1.10 |
41.74 |
43.78 |
40.80 |
40.19 |
39.36 |
39.78 |
79.58 |
2 |
1.23 |
1.37 |
41.40 |
41.87 |
23.44 |
24.84 |
41.13 |
40.43 |
65.18 |
7 |
0.71 |
0.65 |
1.51 |
1.69 |
17.08 |
17.20 |
41.75 |
41.19 |
16.86 |
10 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.89 |
1.02 |
14.78 |
13.90 |
42.72 |
44.43 |
9.37 |
14 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.63 |
0.60 |
1.80 |
7.21 |
41.17 |
42.40 |
5.69 |
17 |
0.05 |
0.00 |
0.21 |
0.54 |
1.38 |
2.10 |
41.01 |
44.02 |
1.98 |
22 |
0.16 |
0.00 |
0.19 |
0.28 |
0.82 |
1.15 |
42.90 |
44.03 |
1.16 |
28 |
0.00 |
0.05 |
0.60 |
0.56 |
1.34 |
1.29 |
45.14 |
46.87 |
1.39 |
Table 2: Degradation values in %
Day |
Positive Control 1 |
Positive Control 2 |
Positive Control Mean |
Test 1 |
Test 2 |
Test Mean |
Abiotic Control |
Adsorption Control |
Toxicity Control |
2 |
0.6 |
4.2 |
2.4 |
43.8 |
39.3 |
41.6 |
-4.5 |
-2.0 |
18.3 |
7 |
97.9 |
97.6 |
97.8 |
58.4 |
57.4 |
57.9 |
-6.1 |
-5.6 |
79.3 |
10 |
97.8 |
97.6 |
97.7 |
62.5 |
64.2 |
63.4 |
-8.5 |
-15.8 |
88.0 |
14 |
98.4 |
98.6 |
98.5 |
95.4 |
81.4 |
88.4 |
-4.6 |
-10.5 |
92.7 |
17 |
99.5 |
98.8 |
99.2 |
96.6 |
94.6 |
95.6 |
-4.2 |
-14.7 |
97.5 |
22 |
99.7 |
99.5 |
99.6 |
98.1 |
97.2 |
97.7 |
-9.0 |
-14.5 |
98.6 |
28 |
98.6 |
98.7 |
98.7 |
96.7 |
96.7 |
96.7 |
-14.7 |
-22.1 |
98.3 |
Table 3: Validity criteria for OECD 301.
Criterion from the guideline |
Outcome |
Validity criterion fulfilled |
Difference of extremes of replicate values of the removal of the test chemical at the plateau, at the end of the test or at the end of the 10-d window, as appropriate, is less than 20%. |
0% |
Yes |
Percentage degradation of the reference compound reached the pass level by day 14 (≥ 60%). |
pass level of 70 % on day 5 |
Yes |
The toxicity control should degrade to at least 35% (based on DOC) or at least 25% (based on ThOD or ThCO2) within 14 d. |
93 % |
Yes |
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Biodegradation in water:
- readily biodegradable
- Type of water:
- freshwater
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.