Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Acute Toxicity: inhalation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: inhalation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 23 March to 25 June 2015
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- GLP study conducted in compliance with OECD Guideline No. 403 without any deviation.
- Justification for type of information:
- Information as to the availability of the in vivo study is provided in 'attached justification'.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 015
- Report date:
- 2015
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 403 (Acute Inhalation Toxicity)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.2 (Acute Toxicity (Inhalation))
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- UK GLP Compliance Programme (inspected on 12-14 March 2014 / signed on 12 May 2014)
- Test type:
- traditional method
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- (+)-(2Z)-4,8-DIMETHYL-2,7-NONADIEN-4-OL
- Molecular formula:
- C11H120
- IUPAC Name:
- (+)-(2Z)-4,8-DIMETHYL-2,7-NONADIEN-4-OL
- Reference substance name:
- (-)-(2Z)-4,8-DIMETHYL-2,7-NONADIEN-4-OL
- Molecular formula:
- C11H20O
- IUPAC Name:
- (-)-(2Z)-4,8-DIMETHYL-2,7-NONADIEN-4-OL
- Test material form:
- liquid
- Details on test material:
- - Physical state: Colorless liquid
- Storage condition of test material: Stored at 2-8 °C temperature and protected by Nitrogen.
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Purity test date: 02 September 2014
- Storage condition of test material: Stored cold under nitrogen at approximately 4°C, in the dark
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Remarks:
- RccHan™ : WIST
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd, Oxon, UK.
- Females nulliparous and non-pregnant: Yes
- Age at study initiation: Approximately 8-12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 200-350 g
- Housing: Animals were housed in groups of up to five by sex in solid-floor polypropylene cages with stainless steel lids, furnished with softwood flakes.
- Diet: Food (Harlan 2014C Rodent Diet, Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd, Oxon, UK), ad libitum
- Water: Mains drinking water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 19-25 °C
- Humidity: 30-70 %
- Air changes: 15 per hour
- Photoperiod: 12 h dark / 12 h light
N-LIFE DATES: 23 March to 25 June 2015
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- inhalation: aerosol
- Type of inhalation exposure:
- nose only
- Vehicle:
- air
- Mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD):
- >= 3.26 - <= 3.43 µm
- Geometric standard deviation (GSD):
- >= 2.06 - <= 2.26
- Remark on MMAD/GSD:
- Mean Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter (MMAD) = 3.29, 3.26 and 3.43 μm at mean achieved concentrations of 5.05, 3.25 and 4.62 mg/L, respectively
Geometric Standard Deviation (GSD) = 2.18, 2.06 and 2.26 at mean achieved concentrations of 5.05, 3.25 and 4.62 mg/L, respectively - Details on inhalation exposure:
- GENERATION OF TEST ATMOSPHERE / CHAMBER DESCRIPTION
- Exposure apparatus: Test item was aerosolized using a glass concentric jet nebulizer (Radleys, Saffron Walden, Essex, UK) located at the top of the exposure chamber.
- Exposure chamber volume: Cylindrical exposure chamber had a volume of approximately 30 L (dimensions: 28 cm diameter x 50 cm high).
- One day prior to the day of exposure each rat was acclimatized (for approximately 2 h) to a tapered polycarbonate restraining tube.
- Method of holding animals in test chamber: During the exposure period, each rat was individually held in a tapered, polycarbonate restraining tube fitted onto a single tier of the exposure chamber and sealed by means of a rubber ‘O’ ring. Only the nose of each animal was exposed to the test atmosphere.
- Source and rate of air: Chamber flow rate was maintained at 60 L/min providing 120 air changes per hour.
- Method of particle size determination: The particle size of the generated atmosphere inside the exposure chamber was determined three times during the exposure period using a Marple Personal Cascade Impactor (Westech IS Ltd, Beds., UK).
- Treatment of exhaust air: The extract from the exposure chamber passed through a ‘scrubber’ trap and was connected with a high efficiency filter to a metered exhaust system.
- Temperature and humidity in air chamber: Temperature and relative humidity inside the exposure chamber were measured by an electronic thermometer/humidity meter (Hanna Instruments Ltd, Beds.
, UK) located in a vacant port in the animals’ breathing zone of the chamber and recorded every thirty minutes throughout the four-hour exposure period. Temperature and humidity in air chamber were 19-20 °C and 26-41%, respectively.
- Exposure chamber oxygen concentration: Oxygen levels within the exposure chamber were measured by an electronic oxygen analyzer (Servomex (UK) Ltd, Crowborough, East Sussex) located in a port in the animals breathing zone during the four-hour exposure period. The test atmosphere was generated to contain at least 19% oxygen.
- Exposure Chamber Atmosphere Concentration: Prior to the start of the study, the non-volatile component of the test item was determined by adding a small, known amount of test item to glass fiber filters and recording their weights. The filters were then dried in a desiccator between 18 and 20 °C for approximately 24 hours and then weighed again. The difference in the two weights was taken as the volatile content of the test item and the non-volatile component was calculated as a percentage. The non-volatile component of the batch used during the study was found to be approximately 8.62 % (n=2). Due to the very low levels of non-volatiles contained within this test item it was considered appropriate to use chemical analysis in order to determine test atmosphere concentrations for all exposure groups.
The test atmosphere was sampled nine times during each exposure period. The sampling procedure involved 2 to 3 liters of test atmosphere (dependent on concentration) being drawn through a glass impinger or a series of two glass impingers (dependent on concentration) containing Methanol (each made up to 80 mL). The samples were then submitted for chemical analysis.
The nominal chamber concentrations were calculated by dividing the mass of test item used by the total volume of air passed through the chamber during each exposure.
The nominal concentrations were 434 %, 366 % and 372 % of the actual mean achieved atmosphere concentration for Groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively and show that keeping the aerosol airborne was relatively straightforward for all dose groups.
- Pretreatment: Prior to the start of the study, test item atmospheres were generated within the exposure chamber. During this characterization period test item input rates were varied to achieve the required atmospheric conditions.
- Following an appropriate equilibration period three groups, each of five or ten rats (five males and/or five females), were subjected to a single exposure to the test item for a period of four hours. Based on the expected toxicity of the test item, a target concentration of 5.0 mg/L was used for the first exposure. Further concentrations were selected after consideration of the results of the previous exposure.
TEST ATMOSPHERE
- Brief description of analytical method used: The actual concentration of the test item was measured off-line by high performance gas chromatography (GC).
- Samples taken from breathing zone: Yes
- Particle size distribution: See table 7.2.2/2
- MMAD (Mass median aerodynamic diameter) / GSD (Geometric st. dev.): Mean Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter (MMAD) = 3.29, 3.26 and 3.43 μm at mean achieved concentrations of 5.05, 3.25 and 4.62 mg/L, respectively; Geometric Standard Deviation (GSD) = 2.18, 2.06 and 2.26 at mean achieved concentrations of 5.05, 3.25 and 4.62 mg/L, respectively. - Analytical verification of test atmosphere concentrations:
- yes
- Duration of exposure:
- 4 h
- Concentrations:
- Nominal concentration: 21.9, 11.9 and 17.2 mg/L
Mean achieved atmosphere concentration: 5.05, 3.25 and 4.62 mg/L - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations: All animals were observed for clinical signs at hourly intervals during exposure, immediately on removal from the restraining tubes at the end of exposure, one hour after termination of exposure and subsequently once daily for up to fourteen days. Any deaths or evidence of overt toxicity were recorded at each observation.
- Frequency of weighing: Individual body weights were recorded on arrival, prior to treatment on the day of exposure and on Days 1, 3, 7 and 14 or at death.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: Yes, at the end of the 14 day observation period all animals were killed by intravenous overdose of sodium pentobarbitone. All animals, including those that died or were humanely killed during the study were subjected to a full external and internal examination, and any macroscopic abnormalities were recorded. The respiratory tract was subjected to a detailed macroscopic examination for signs of irritancy or local toxicity. - Statistics:
- Using the mortality data obtained, an estimate of the acute inhalation median lethal concentration (LC50) was calculated using validated data analysis software (R Environment, (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.)). This software utilized Log-Normal (Probit) regression models in order to calculate the LC50 values. LC50 values and 95% confidence limits were calculated for males and females separately.
Results and discussion
- Preliminary study:
- Not applicable
Effect levelsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect level:
- 5.23 mg/L air (analytical)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- 95% CL:
- >= 4.45 - <= 6.01
- Exp. duration:
- 4 h
- Key result
- Sex:
- female
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect level:
- 4.84 mg/L air (analytical)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- 95% CL:
- >= 4.29 - <= 5.38
- Exp. duration:
- 4 h
- Key result
- Sex:
- male
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect level:
- 5.18 mg/L air (analytical)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- 95% CL:
- >= 3.98 - <= 6.38
- Exp. duration:
- 4 h
- Mortality:
- At 5.05 mg/L, 1/5 male and 3/5 females died
At 3.25 mg/L, 0/5 female died (males not exposed)
At 4.62 mg/L, 2/5 females died (males not exposed) - Clinical signs:
- other: Common abnormalities noted during the study included decreased respiratory rate, increased respiratory rate, hunched posture, pilo-erection, and wet fur. There were frequent instances of labored respiration, occasional instances of noisy respiration, atax
- Body weight:
- Group 1 – All surviving animals exhibited body weight losses on Day 1 post-exposure. Body weight gains were then noted in all surviving animals during the remainder of the recovery period.
Group 2 – All animals exhibited body weight losses on the first day post-exposure. With the exception of one animal, which showed no body weight gain during the final week of the recovery period, body weight gains were noted in all animals during the remainder of the recovery period.
Group 3 – All surviving animals exhibited body weight losses on Day 1 post-exposure and from Days 1 to 3 post-exposure. Body weight gains were then noted in all animals during the remainder of the recovery period. - Gross pathology:
- With the exception of one male animal from Group 1 which exhibited dark patches on the lungs, no macroscopic abnormalities were detected at necropsy amongst animals that survived until the end of the recovery periods.
The following macroscopic abnormalities were detected at necropsy amongst animals that were humanely killed or were found dead during the course of the study: Lungs – dark patches; Small intestine – contained dark substance.
Due to the observations noted during the study and at necropsy it is considered that deaths noted during the study may have been mainly attributable to systemic toxicity. - Other findings:
- None
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 7.2.2/1: Exposure Chamber Concentration
The actual concentration of the test item was measured off-line by high performance gas chromatography (GC). The test atmospheres were sampled after theoretical chamber equilibration and then at approximately half-hourly intervals during each exposure period.
The concentration of the test item was shown to be stable and the mean values obtained were:
Group Number
|
Mean Achieved (mg/L)
|
Standard Deviation
|
Nominal (mg/L)
|
1 |
5.05 |
0.12 |
21.9 |
2 |
3.25 |
0.23 |
11.9 |
3 |
4.62 |
0.08 |
17.2 |
The chamber flow rate was maintained at 60 L/min providing 120 air changes per hour.
The theoretical chamber equilibration time (T99) was 3 minutes (Silver, 1946).
Table 7.2.2/2: Particle Size Distribution
Group Number
|
Mean Achieved Atmosphere Concentration (mg/L) |
Mean Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter (μm) |
Inhalable Fraction (% <4 μm) |
Geometric Standard Deviation |
1 |
5.05 |
3.29 |
60.0 |
2.18 |
2 |
3.25 |
3.26 |
61.2 |
2.06 |
3 |
4.62 |
3.43 |
57.6 |
2.26 |
Table 7.2.2/3: Mortality Data
Group Number
|
Mean Achieved Atmosphere Concentration (mg/L) |
Deaths
|
||
Male
|
Female |
Total |
||
1 |
5.05 |
1/5 |
3/5 |
4/10 |
2 |
3.25 |
NOT EXPOSED |
0/5 |
0/5 |
3 |
4.62 |
NOT EXPOSED |
2/5 |
2/5 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 4 based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- The inhalation LC50 and 95% confidence limits of test item were calculated to be
All animals: 5.23 (4.45 – 6.01) mg/L; Males only: 5.18 (3.98 – 6.38) mg/L; Females only: 4.84 (4.29 – 5.38) mg/L
Under the test conditions, the test item is classified as Category 4 according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 (CLP) and to GHS. - Executive summary:
In an acute inhalation toxicity study performed according to OECD Guideline 403 and in compliance with GLP, three groups of five or ten RccHan™ : WIST strain rats (five males and/or five females) were exposed to an aerosol atmosphere of the test item for 4 hours.
Nominal concentration: 21.9, 11.9 and 17.2 mg/L (corresponding to mean achieved atmosphere concentrations: 5.05, 3.25 and 4.62 mg/L, respectively)
Animals were observed for mortality, clinical signs and body weight for 14 days and at the end of the study the animals were sacrificed for macroscopic examination.
At 5.05 mg/L, 1/5 male and 3/5 females died;
At 3.25 mg/L, 0/5 female died (males not exposed);
At 4.62 mg/L, 2/5 females died (males not exposed).
Common abnormalities noted during the study included decreased respiratory rate, increased respiratory rate, hunched posture, pilo-erection, and wet fur. There were frequent instances of labored respiration, occasional instances of noisy respiration, ataxia, coma and red/brown staining around the eyes and snout and isolated occurrences of exophthalmos, dehydration, pallor of the extremities, lethargy, ptosis and prostration. Surviving Group 1 animals appeared normal on Day 7 post-exposure. All Group 2 animals recovered to appear normal on Day 3 post-exposure and surviving animals from Group 3 recovered to appear normal on Day 6 post-exposure.
Group 1 (5.05 mg/L) – All surviving animals exhibited body weight losses on Day 1 post-exposure. Body weight gains were then noted in all surviving animals during the remainder of the recovery period.
Group 2 (3.25 mg/L) – All animals exhibited body weight losses on the first day post-exposure. With the exception of one animal, which showed no body weight gain during the final week of the recovery period, body weight gains were noted in all animals during the remainder of the recovery period.
Group 3 (4.62 mg/L) – All surviving animals exhibited body weight losses on Day 1 post-exposure and from Days 1 to 3 post-exposure. Body weight gains were then noted in all animals during the remainder of the recovery period.
With the exception of one male animal from Group 1 which exhibited dark patches on the lungs, no macroscopic abnormalities were detected at necropsy amongst animals that survived until the end of the recovery periods. The following macroscopic abnormalities were detected at necropsy amongst animals that were humanely killed or were found dead during the course of the study: Lungs – dark patches; Small intestine – contained dark substance.
Due to the observations noted during the study and at necropsy it is considered that deaths noted during the study may have been mainly attributable to systemic toxicity.
The inhalation LC50 and 95% confidence limits of test item were calculated to be
All animals: 5.23 (4.45 – 6.01) mg/L; Males only: 5.18 (3.98 – 6.38) mg/L; Females only: 4.84 (4.29 – 5.38) mg/L
Under the test conditions, the test item is classified as Category 4 according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 (CLP) and to GHS.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
