Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1996-08-13 to 1996-09-24
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1996
Report date:
1996

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1,3,5-tris[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]-1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)-trione
EC Number:
247-465-8
EC Name:
1,3,5-tris[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]-1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)-trione
Cas Number:
26115-70-8
Molecular formula:
C21H45N3O12Si3
IUPAC Name:
tris[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]-1,3,5-triazinane-2,4,6-trione

Method

Species / strainopen allclose all
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Species / strain / cell type:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Aroclor induced rat liver S9
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Pre-test: 6.7, 10, 33, 67, 100, 333, 667, 1000, 3333, 5000, with and without metabolic activation
Experiment 1: 100, 333, 1000, 3333, 5000, with and without metabolic activation
Experiment 2: 33, 100, 333, 1000, 5000, with and without metabolic activation
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO

- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Sponsor indicated that the test article is stable in DMSO
Controlsopen allclose all
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: 2-aminoanthracene
Remarks:
All salmonella strains (with activation)
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
2-nitrofluorene
Remarks:
TA 98 (without activation)
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
sodium azide
Remarks:
TA 100, TA 1535 (without activation)
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
Remarks:
TA 1537 (without activation)
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
methylmethanesulfonate
Remarks:
WP2 uvrA (without activation)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar ; preincubation


DURATION
- Preincubation period: 60 minutes

- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 - 72 hours

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 plates for each test concentration

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Background lawn assessment, revertant colony counts
Evaluation criteria:
For a test substance to be considered positive, it must cause at least a doubling in the mean revertants per plate of at least one tester strain with a minimum of two increasing concentrations of test article.

A result is positive if the number of revertants is significantly increased compared with the solvent control to at least 2-fold of the solvent control for TA 98, TA 100 and WP2 uvrA and 3-fold of the solvent control for TA 1535 and TA 1537.

Cytotoxicity is defined as a reduction in the number of colonies by >50% compared with the solvent control and/or at least a moderate reduction in
the background lawn (background code 3,4 or 5).


Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
3333 - 5000 µg/plate
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:

TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS

- Precipitation: Interfering precipitate noted at 5000 µg/plate in TA 98 and TA 1535 (+/-MA), TA 1537 (-MA) and WP2 uvrA (-MA) 1000 - 5000 (+MA)

COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: Results were within range of historical control data


Remarks on result:
other: No mutagenic potential

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 2: Dose range-finding study Number of revertants per plate (2 plates per strain)

TA 100

WP2 uvrA

Concentration (µg/Plate)

Plate 1

+ MA

Plate 2

- MA

Cytotoxic (Yes/No)

Plate 1

+ MA

Plate 2

- MA

Cytotoxic (Yes/No)

0

133

98

No

16

23

No

6.7

128

110

No

13

8

No

10

123

95

No

28

17

No

33

134

98

No

13

9

No

67

150

84

No

19

19

No

100

147

111

No

17

15

No

333

146

107

No

11

20

No

667

134

104

No

22

26

No

1000

148

123

No

32

16

No

3333

146

116

No

15

18

No

5000

168

113

No

24

16

No

*solvent control with DMSO

Table 3: Experiment 1 Mutagenicity Assay Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)

 

TA98

TA100

TA1535

Conc.
(
µg/plate)

MA

+

MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

MA

+

MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

MA

+

MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

0*

16

27

No

134

161

No

11

12

No

100

21

30

No

131

156

No

11

11

No

333

11

24

No

134

163

No

10

14

No

1000

20

24

No

129

164

No

12

13

No

3333

20

32

No

141

167

No

9

11

No

5000

15

28

No

126

172

No

10

15

No

Positive control

367

873

No

720

1035

No

637

129

No

*solvent control with DMSO

Table 3: Experiment 1 Mutagenicity Assay Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)

 

TA1537

WP2uvrA

Conc.
(
µg/plate)

MA

+

 MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

MA

+

 MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

0*

5

12

No

17

19

No

100

4

8

No

14

18

No

333

6

8

No

17

13

No

1000

4

9

No

10

16

No

3333

6

8

Yes

16

15

No

5000

6

6

Yes

17

14

No

Positive control

1070

119

No

292

108

No

*solvent control with DMSO

Table 4: Experiment 2 Mutagenicity Assay Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)

 

TA98

TA100

TA1535

Conc.
(
µg/plate)

MA

+

MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

MA

+

MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

MA

+

MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

0*

26

44

No

106

129

No

10

12

No

33

26

39

No

121

131

No

11

11

No

100

24

46

No

136

153

No

9

16

No

333

26

35

No

117

142

No

11

14

No

1000

25

39

No

119

166

No

11

11

No

5000

19

38

No

138

167

No

11

10

No

Positive control

292

901

No

534

945

No

446

106

No

*solvent control with DMSO

Table 4: Experiment 2 Mutagenicity Assay Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)

 

TA1537

WP2 uvrA

Conc.
(
µg/plate)

MA

+

MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

MA

+

MA

Cytotoxic
(yes/no)

0*

6

5

No

21

14

No

33

5

6

No

16

14

No

100

5

7

No

21

15

No

333

4

6

No

18

15

No

1000

5

9

No

19

18

No

5000

3

7

Yes

22

15

No

Positive control

598

97

No

430

118

No

*solvent control with DMSO

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Under test conditions, no mutagenic effect was observed for the test substance tested up to cytotoxic concentration in any of the test strains in two independent experiments without and with metabolic activation. The test substance is non-mutagenic in test strains used.