Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vitro
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 442D (In Vitro Skin Sensitisation: ARE-Nrf2 Luciferase Test Method)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
activation of keratinocytes
Specific details on test material used for the study:
6.1 Test Item
Designation in Test Facility: 17092503G
Date of Receipt: 25. Sep. 2017
Condition at Receipt: Room temperature, in proper conditions
6.1.1 Specification
The following information concerning identity and composition of the test item was provid-ed by the sponsor.
Name gamma-Dodecalactone
Batch no. 050170905
Appearance clear, colorless liquid
Composition gamma-Dodecalactone
Purity 99.02%
Homogeneity homogeneous
Expiry date 18. Sep. 2018
Storage Room Temperature: (20 ± 5°C)
The following information was provided by the sponsor as well:
CAS No. 2305-05-7
EINECS-No. 218-971-6
Molecular formula C12H22O2
Molecular weight 198.3 g/mol
Vapour pressure unknown
Stability H2O: unknown; EtOH: unknown; acetone: unknown; CH3CN: unknown; DMSO: unknown
Solubility H2O: unknown; EtOH: 0.1 - 1 g/L; acetone: unknown; CH3CN: unknown; DMSO: unknown
Production date 19. Sep. 2017
6.1.2 Storage
The test item was stored in the test facility at room temperature (20 ± 5°C).
6.1.3 Preparation
The solubility of the test item was determined in a non-GLP pre-test in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and medium (DMEM). The test item forms a suspension in DMEM but is soluble in DMSO at the required concentration (200 mM). Therefore, DMSO was used as solvent.
Since the final concentration of the solvent during treatment is limited to 1 %, a stock solution containing 200 mM (CRFT) and 250 mM (experiment I and II) test item in DMSO was prepared. In experiment I and II this stock solution was first 1:10 diluted. Subsequent dilution to 1% finally yielded a maximum concentration of 2000 µM in the pre-test and 250 µM in the experiments.
For that, the stock solution was first used to prepare a geometric series of solutions (CRFT: factor 2; main experiments: factor 1.2) on a master plate. Afterwards all concentrations were further diluted (1:25) in medium no. 3 on a dilution plate. Another 1:4 dilution was achieved by adding 50 µL of each concentration of the dilution plate to the corresponding wells of the test plate containing the cells as well as 150 µL medium no. 3. In the end, the total dilution factor was 1:100. The stock solution as well as the dilutions were freshly pre-pared on the day of treatment.
Details on the study design:
6.3 Test System
6.3.1 Reasons for the Choice of the LuSens Cell Line
The LuSens cell line was specially designed for this test system by the BASF SE (Lud-wigshafen, Germany). It employs the use of a reporter gene for luciferase placed under the control of the antioxidant response element (ARE) and hence monitors Nrf-2 transcription factor activity. For designing this cell line, a human keratinocyte cell line (provided by RWTH, Aachen, Germany) was transfected with the pGL4.20 [luc2/Puro] vector (Promega, Germany) carrying the regulatory antioxidant response element (ARE) upstream of the luciferase gene (Luc2, Promega, Germany) at the Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology of the RWTH, Aachen (laboratory of PD Dr. Wruck).
6.3.2 Cell Cultures
For mycoplasma contamination screened stocks of LuSens cells are stored in liquid nitro-gen in the cell bank of LAUS GmbH to allow a continuous stock of cells, which guarantees similar parameters of the experiment and reproducible characteristics of the cells.
For the Cytotoxicity Range Finder Assay cells of passage 14 were used. For both main experiments cells of passage 6 were used. After thawing the cells were cultivated in DMEM (9 % FCS) in cell culture flasks at 37 ± 1 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5.0 ± 0.5 % CO2.
Positive control results:
Criteria
The average induction for the positive control should be ≥ 2.5 fold and it should have a relative viability of at least 70 %.

Found in experiment I
Positive control Fold induction: 7.7
Relative viability: 90.3 %

Found in experiment II
Positive control Fold induction: 6.0
Relative viability: 89.4 %
Key result
Run / experiment:
other:
Parameter:
other: Fold induction
Remarks:
Fold induction = [(Lsample - Lblank) / (Lsolvent - Lblank)]
Value:
1.5
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation
Interpretation of results:
Category 1 (skin sensitising) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
In conclusion, it can be stated that under the experimental conditions of this study, the test item, gamma-Dodecalactone, was positive in the LuSens assay and is therefore considered to have the potential to activate the Nrf2 transcription factor (sensitizing potential).
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in chemico
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 442C (In Chemico Skin Sensitisation: Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (DPRA))
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
other: direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA test)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
6.1 Test Item
Designation in Test Facility: 17092503G
Date of Receipt: 25. Sep. 2017
Condition at Receipt: Room temperature, in proper conditions
6.1.1 Specification
The following information concerning identity and composition of the test item was provid-ed by the sponsor.
Name gamma-Dodecalactone
Batch no. 050170905
Appearance clear, colorless liquid
Composition gamma-Dodecalactone
CAS No. 2305-05-7
EINECS-No. 218-971-6
Molecular formula C12H22O2
Molecular weight 198.3 g/mol
Purity 99.02 %
Homogeneity homogeneous
Vapour pressure unknown
Stability H2O: unknown; EtOH: unknown; acetone: unknown; CH3CN: unknown; DMSO: unknown
Solubility H2O: unknown; EtOH: 0.1 - 1 g/L; acetone: unknown; CH3CN: unknown; DMSO: unknown
Production date 19. Sep. 2017
Expiry date 18. Sep. 2018
Storage Room Temperature (20 ± 5°C)
6.1.2 Storage
The test item was stored in a closed vessel at room temperature (20 ± 5 °C).
Details on the study design:
Peptides with ≥ 95 % purity, synthesized by Genecust, Dudelange, Luxemburg, were used.
6.3.1 Cys-Peptide (Cysteine)
Sequence: Ac-RFAACAA-COOH (MW = 750.9 g/mol)
Batch no.:P170415-2-LR569638
Purity: 98.10 %
6.3.2 Lys-Peptide (Lysine)
Sequence: Ac-RFAAKAA-COOH (MW = 775.9 g/mol)
Batch no.: P170415-2-LR569640
Purity: 98.85 %
Positive control results:
a)The mean peptide depletion and standard deviation of the three replicates of the positive control cinnamaldehyde were in the acceptable range of 60.8 – 100.0 % and ≤ 14.9 %, respectively, for the Cys-peptide.
b)The mean peptide depletion and standard deviation of the three replicates of the positive control 2,3-Butanedione were in the acceptable range of 10.0 – 45.0 % and ≤ 11.6 %, respectively, for the Lys-peptide.
Key result
Run / experiment:
other:
Parameter:
other: Mean peptide depletion [%]
Value:
1.03
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The mean peptide depletion in the Lys-peptide and Cys-peptide assay was 1.03 %, there-fore the test item was classified with:
DPRA Prediction: Negative
Reactivity class: Minimal
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification