Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 254-399-3 | CAS number: 39282-36-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 9th April to 24th May 2007
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 007
- Report date:
- 2007
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline available
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Principle of test: To determine by repetitive epidermal contact the potential of the test substance to induce primary or cumulative irritation and/or allergic contact sensitisation.
- Short description of test conditions: The upper back between the scapulae served as the treatment area. Approximately 0.2g of the substance was applied to the 1"x1" absorbent pad portion of a clear adhesive dressing. This was then applied to the appropriate treatment site to form a semi-occlusive patch. There were essentially two phases to the test, these were induction phase and challenge phase. The induction phase involved the initial application of the substance followed by the induction phase where a challenge patch was applied 2 weeks after the initial induction patch. The patch was then removed and the site scored at 24 and 72 hours post-application.
- Parameters analysed / observed: Erythma was scored numerically and if present any additional dermal sequalae was indicated. - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of study:
- patch test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- The HRIPT study presented is considered to be an adequate study to investigate the sensitisation potential of the substance and therefore a LLNA was not warranted.
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Undecanolactone
- EC Number:
- 254-399-3
- EC Name:
- Undecanolactone
- Cas Number:
- 39282-36-5
- Molecular formula:
- C11H20O2
- IUPAC Name:
- (5E,13E)-icosa-5,13-dienoic acid; 6-tetradecyloxan-2-one
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- other: Human
- Strain:
- other:
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- Male and female human subjects aged between 18 to 79 years. A total of 103 subjects completed the study.
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Induction
- Route:
- epicutaneous, semiocclusive
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Concentration / amount:
- 0.2g
- Day(s)/duration:
- Patches applied 3 times per week for a total of 9 applications
- Adequacy of induction:
- not specified
Challenge
- No.:
- #1
- Route:
- epicutaneous, semiocclusive
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Concentration / amount:
- 0.2g
- Day(s)/duration:
- Patch applied 2 weeks after the final induction patch
- Adequacy of challenge:
- not specified
- Positive control substance(s):
- no
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- Not applicable.
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 0.2g
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 103
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 72
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 0.2g
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 103
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The substance did not indicate a potential for dermal irritation or allergic contact sensitisation in a HPRIT.
- Executive summary:
In a HRIPT test the substance did not indicate a potential for dermal irritation or allergic contact sensitisation under the test conditions employed.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
