Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
1976
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with national standard methods with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
purity of test substance; acclimation period, details on test animals and housing/feeding conditions not reported; eyes were washed

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1976

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
purity of test substance; acclimation period, details on test animals and housing/feeding conditions not reported; eyes were washed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Not applicable
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
pre-GLP

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2,4,6-trinitrobenzene-1,3,5-triamine
EC Number:
221-297-5
EC Name:
2,4,6-trinitrobenzene-1,3,5-triamine
Cas Number:
3058-38-6
Molecular formula:
C6H6N6O6
IUPAC Name:
trinitrobenzene-1,3,5-triamine
Test material form:
not specified
Details on test material:
- Name of test material as cited in the report: TATB ; 1,3,5-triamino-2,4,6-trinitrobenzene
- Lot/batch No.of test material: B-318

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: untreated right eye served as control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 g
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Test substance was washed from the eye of six rabbits (30 seconds after instillation in three rabbits; 5 minutes after instillation in another three rabbits); and no washing was done in three rabbits.
Observation period (in vivo):
1, 4, 24, 48, 72, 96 hours and 7 days after instillation of test substance
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
9 animals
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): Test substance was washed from the eye of six rabbits (30 seconds after instillation in three rabbits; 5 minutes after instillation in another three rabbits); and no washing was done in three rabbits.

SCORING SYSTEM: Draize method

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Remarks on result:
other: See "Any other information on results incl. tables"
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Remarks on result:
not determinable
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Remarks on result:
not determinable
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Remarks on result:
not determinable
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Remarks on result:
not determinable
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Irritation was observed in conjunctival and iris tissues only. All three rabbits in the no-wash and 5 minute wash groups showed circumcorneal injection around the iris at the 1-hour reading. This condition persisted for 3 days in the no-wash group. Occasional circumcorneal injection responses were noted in individual rabbits at all treatment levels, but all effects involving the iris had disappeared by day 4 after treatment.
Conjunctival responses were observed at all treatment levels and generally involved mild redness, chemosis, and discharge. The treated eye of all rabbits in the 30-second wash group had returned to normal within 24 hours, whereas the treated eye of rabbits in the 5-minute wash group did not completely clear until day 4, and the no-wash group was not judged normal in response until day 7. Overall, the degree of eye irritation caused by test substance was mild but transitory.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 7.3.2/1: Summary of eye irritation responses in rabbits treated with test substance (three rabbits per wash condition)

 

Tissues graded*

Average Irritancy Score

Hours

Days

1

4

1

2

3

4

7

30 Seconds washing

Cornea

0

0

0

0

0

 

 

Iris

0

1.7

0

0

0

 

 

Conjunctivae

5.3

4.0

0

0

0

 

 

5 minutes washing

Cornea

0

0

0

0

0

 

 

Iris

5.0

0

0

1.7

0

 

 

Conjunctivae

1.7

2.7

2.0

2.0

0.7

0

 

No wash

Cornea

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Iris

5.0

1.7

1.7

1.7

1.7

0

0

Conjunctivae

4.0

2.7

1.3

0.7

0.7

0.7

0

 

*Maximum corneal response: 80; Maximum iris response: 10; Maximum conjunctivae response: 20

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Under the test conditions, the test substance was mild but transitory irritant to the eyes of rabbits.
Executive summary:

In an eye irritation study, 0.1 g of test substance was instilled into the left eye of 9 New Zealand White rabbits while the right eye remained untreated and served as control. Test substance was washed from the eye of six rabbits (30 seconds after instillation in three rabbits; 5 minutes after instillation in another three rabbits); and no washing was done in three rabbits. Animals were observed at 1, 4, 24, 48, 72, 96 h and 7 days after instillation of test substance.

Irritation was observed in conjunctival and iris tissues only. All three rabbits in the no-wash and 5 minute wash groups showed circumcorneal injection around the iris at the 1-hour reading. This condition persisted for 3 days in the no-wash group. Occasional circumcorneal injection responses were noted in individual rabbits at all treatment levels, but all effects involving the iris had disappeared by day 4 after treatment. Conjunctival responses were observed at all treatment levels and generally involved mild redness, chemosis, and discharge. The treated eye of all rabbits in the 30-second wash group had returned to normal within 24 hours, whereas the treated eye of rabbits in the 5-minute wash group did not completely clear until day 4, and the no-wash group was not judged normal in response until day 7. Overall, the degree of eye irritation caused by test substance was mild but transitory.

Under the test conditions, the test substance was mild but transitory irritant to the eyes of rabbits.