Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
Adsorption / desorption
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- adsorption / desorption, other
- Remarks:
- adsorption
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Remarks:
- The substance is not fully compliant with the applicability domain of the model. However, this calculation is used in a weight of evidence approach, in accordance to the REACh Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex XI General rules for adaptation of the standard testing regime set out in Annexes VII to X, 1.2. It is adequately documented and justified: the prediction is evaluated on the basis of the model performance on similar substances. For more details see section `overall remarks, attachments´.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version: EPI Suite v4.11
- Model(s) used: KOCWIN v2.00, MCI based method
Full reference and details of the used formulas can be found in:
Meylan, W., P.H. Howard and R.S. Boethling, "Molecular Topology/Fragment Contribution Method for Predicting Soil Sorption Coefficients", Environ. Sci. Technol. 26: 1560-7 (1992)
- Model description: see field 'Justification for non-standard information', 'Attached justification' and 'any other information on Material and methods'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justific ation for type of information', 'Attached justification' and/or 'overall remarks' - GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- other: calculation
- Media:
- soil
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- The modeling was performed on monoesters with laurate substitution in the 2,4'; 2,6; 2,6'; 4,4'; 4,6'; and 6,6' positions.
SMILES
2,4': O1C(CO)C(O)C(O)C(OC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCC)C1OC2(CO)C(O)C(OC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCC)C(CO)O2
2,6': O1C(CO)C(O)C(O)C(OC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCC)C1OC2(CO)C(O)C(O)C(COC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCC)O2
2,6: O1C(COC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCC)C(O)C(O)C(OC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCC)C1OC2(CO)C(O)C(O)C(CO)O2
4,4': O1C(CO)C(OC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCC)C(O)C(O)C1OC2(CO)C(O)C(OC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCC)C(CO)O2
4,6': O1C(CO)C(OC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCC)C(O)C(O)C1OC2(CO)C(O)C(O)C(COC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCC)O2
6,6': O1C(COC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCC)C(O)C(O)C(O)C1OC2(CO)C(O)C(O)C(COC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCC)O2 - Details on test conditions:
- BASIS FOR CALCULATION OF Koc:
- Estimation software: EPI Suite™ v 4.11, KOCWIN v2.00, MCI based method - Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- >= 113 500 - <= 124 400 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- Type:
- log Koc
- Value:
- >= 5.055 - <= 5.095 dimensionless
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- Endpoint:
- adsorption / desorption, other
- Remarks:
- adsorption
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Remarks:
- The substance is not fully compliant with the applicability domain of the model. However, this calculation is used in a weight of evidence approach, in accordance to the REACh Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex XI General rules for adaptation of the standard testing regime set out in Annexes VII to X, 1.2. It is adequately documented and justified: the prediction is evaluated on the basis of the model performance on similar substances. For more details see section `overall remarks, attachments´.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version: EPI Suite v4.11
- Model(s) used: KOCWIN v2.00, MCI based method
Full reference and details of the used formulas can be found in:
Meylan, W., P.H. Howard and R.S. Boethling, "Molecular Topology/Fragment Contribution Method for Predicting Soil Sorption Coefficients", Environ. Sci. Technol. 26: 1560-7 (1992)
- Model description: see field 'Justification for non-standard information', 'Attached justification' and 'any other information on Material and methods'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justific ation for type of information', 'Attached justification' and/or 'overall remarks' - GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- other: calculation
- Media:
- soil
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- The modeling was performed on monoesters with laurate substitution in the 1', 2, 3, 3', 4, 6, and 6' positions.
SMILES:
1 Position: O1C(CO)C(O)C(O)C(O)C1OC2(COC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCC)C(O)C(O)C(CO)O2
2 Position: O1C(CO)C(O)C(O)C(OC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCC)C1OC2(CO)C(O)C(O)C(CO)O2
3 Position: O1C(CO)C(O)C(OC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCC)C(O)C1OC2(CO)C(O)C(O)C(CO)O2
3' Position: O1C(CO)C(O)C(O)C(O)C1OC2(CO)C(OC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCC)C(O)C(CO)O2
4 Position: O1C(CO)C(OC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCC)C(O)C(O)C1OC2(CO)C(O)C(O)C(CO)O2
6' Position: O1C(CO)C(O)C(O)C(O)C1OC2(CO)C(O)C(O)C(COC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCC)O2
6 Position: O1C(COC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCC)C(O)C(O)C(O)C1OC2(CO)C(O)C(O)C(CO)O2 - Details on test conditions:
- BASIS FOR CALCULATION OF Koc:
- Estimation software: EPI Suite™ v 4.11, KOCWIN v2.00, MCI based method - Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- >= 1 045 - <= 1 093 L/kg
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- Type:
- log Koc
- Value:
- >= 3.019 - <= 3.039 dimensionless
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
Referenceopen allclose all
| Laurate Position | Koc | Log Koc |
| 2,4' | 124400 | 5.0948 |
| 2,6' | 118800 | 5.0749 |
| 2,6 | 118800 | 5.0749 |
| 4,4' | 124400 | 5.0948 |
| 4,6' | 118800 | 5.0749 |
| 6,6' | 113500 | 5.0551 |
| Position of Laurate Substitution | Koc | Log Koc |
| 1' | 1045 | 3.0190 |
| 2 | 1093 | 3.0388 |
| 3 | 1093 | 3.0388 |
| 3' | 1093 | 3.0388 |
| 4 | 1093 | 3.0388 |
| 6' | 1045 | 3.0190 |
| 6 | 1045 | 3.0190 |
Description of key information
log Koc: 3.0190 - 3.0388 (mono-ester), 5.0551 -5.0948 (di-ester)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
No experimental studies investigating the adsorption/desorption potential of the substance are available. Therefore, the log Koc values were calculated using KOCWIN v2.00 based on the Molecular Connectivity Index (MCI). The models have no universally accepted definition of the model domain, but since the substance is outside the log Kow and/or molecular weight and/or structural domain range of the training set of the MCI the results should be taken with caution. The definite values may not be fully reliable, but indicate a moderate to high adsorption potential, which is also to be expected based on the high log Kow (> 2.5). Estimations based on the MCI method resulted in log Koc values of 3.0190 -5.0948 based on the variance of esterification (mono- and di- esters). In conclusion, the model indicates a moderate high potential for adsorption and thus low mobility in soil with slow to negligible migration to groundwater.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
